Guilt and Antisocial Conformism: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh

Shoji, Masahiro (2020): Guilt and Antisocial Conformism: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh.

Abstract

This study conducted a lab-in-the-field experiment in rural Bangladesh to disentangle motives for conformity in antisocial behavior. In a take-away game, the previous participants’ choice is revealed before a decision is made. Conformism is measured by the correlation between the information and own choice. This design allows conformism via learning about social norms, changing social preference, and changing the belief about the opponent’s expected amount of take-away. To disentangle the effect of belief, the participants in the treatment group are also informed about the opponent’s expected amount to be taken away. The results show conformism only in the control group, suggesting the channel through the belief. These results are consistent with the broken windows theory and also support the relevance of belief-dependent social preference in decision making.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Conformism; guilt aversion; belief-dependent preference; antisocial behavior; broken windows theory
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

References

Andreoni, J., Bernheim, D.B., 2009. Social image and the 50-50 norm: a theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77, 1607–1636.

Barmettler, F., Fehr, E., Zehnder, C., 2012. Big experimenter is watching you! Anonymity and prosocial behavior in the laboratory. Games and Economic Behavior 75, 17–34.

Battigalli, P., Charness, G., Dufwenberg, M., 2013. Deception: the role of guilt. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 93, 227–232.

Bayer, P., Hjalmarsson, R., Pozen, D, 2009. Building criminal capital behind bars: peer effects in juvenile corrections. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124, 105–147.

Beck, A., Kerschbamer, R., Qiu, J., Sutter, M., 2013. Shaping beliefs in experimental markets for expert services: guilt aversion and the impact of promises and money-burning options. Game and Economic Behavior 81(1), 145–164.

Bellemare, C., Sebald, A., Strobel, M., 2011. Measuring the willingness to pay to avoid guilt: estimation using equilibrium and stated belief models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 26(3), 437–453.

Blanco, M., Engelmann, D., Koch, A., Normann, H. 2010. Belief elicitation in experiments: is there a hedging problem? Experimental Economics 13, 412-438.

Brandts, J., Charness, G., 2011. The strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons. Experimental Economics 14, 375–398.

Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., & Miller, D. L. (2008). Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), 414-427.

Carpenter, J.P. (2004). When in Rome: Conformity and the provision of public goods. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(4), 395–408.

Charness, G., Dufwenberg, M., 2006. Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74, 1579–1601.

Chen, Y., Harper, F. M., Konstan, J., & Li, S. X. (2010). Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on movielens. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1358-98.

Dahl, G., DellaVigna, S., 2009. Does movie violence increase violent crime. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124, 677–734.

Dufwenberg, M., Gächter, S., Hennig–Schmidt, H., 2011. The framing of games and the psychology of play. Games and Economic Behavior 73, 459–478.

Eichenberger, R., Oberholzer–Gee, F., 1998. Rational moralists: the role of fairness in democratic economic politics. Public Choice 94, 191–210.

Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Mollerstrom, J., Munkhammar, S., 2012. Social framing effects: preferences or beliefs? Games and Economic Behavior 76, 117–130.

Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Tjøtta, S., Torsvik, G., 2010. Testing guilt aversion. Games and Economic Behavior 68, 95–107.

Falk, A., Fischbacher, U., 2002. “Crime” in the lab-detecting social interaction. European Economic Review 46, 859–869.

Fatas, E., Heap, S. P. H., & Arjona, D. R. (2018). Preference conformism: An experiment. European Economic Review, 105, 71-82.

Fehr, E., Hoff, K., 2011. Introduction: tastes, castes and culture: the influence of society on preferences. Economic Journal 121, F396–F412.

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., 2010. Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 100, 541–556.

Funk, P., 2005. Governmental action, social norms and criminal behaviour. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 161, 522–535.

Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D., & Sefton, M. (2013). PEER EFFECTS IN PRO‐SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: SOCIAL NORMS OR SOCIAL PREFERENCES?. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 548-573.

Gächter, S., Renner, E. 2010. The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics 13, 364–377.

Gaviria, A., & Raphael, S. (2001). School-based peer effects and juvenile behavior. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 257-268.

Glaeser, E.L., Sacerdote, B., Scheinkman, J.A., 1996. Crime and social interactions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 507–548.

Greene, W. H. (2018). Econometric Analysis. Pearson Education.

Hauge, K. E. (2016). Generosity and guilt: The role of beliefs and moral standards of others. Journal of Economic Psychology 54, 35–43.

Khalmetski, K. (2016). Testing guilt aversion with an exogenous shift in beliefs. Games and Economic Behavior 97, 110–119.

Khalmetski, K., Ockenfels, A., & Werner, P. (2015). Surprising gifts: Theory and laboratory evidence. Journal of Economic Theory 159, 163–208.

Kawagoe, T., & Narita, Y. (2014). Guilt aversion revisited: An experimental test of a new model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 102, 1-9.

Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., Steg, L., 2008. The spreading of disorder. Science 322, 1681–1685.

Kelling, G.L., Wilson, J.Q., 1982. Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly.

Kremer, M., & Levy, D. (2008). Peer effects and alcohol use among college students. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 189-189.

López-Pérez, R. (2008). Aversion to norm-breaking: A model. Games and Economic Behavior, 64(1), 237-267.

Ludwig, J., Kling, J.R., 2007. Is crime contagious? Journal of Law and Economics 50, 491–518.

Ludwig, J., Duncan, G., Hirschfield, P., 2001. Urban poverty and juvenile crime: evidence from a randomised housing-mobility experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 655–679.

Lundborg, P. (2006). Having the wrong friends? Peer effects in adolescent substance use. Journal of health economics, 25(2), 214-233.

Manski, C.F., 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies 60, 531–542.

Manski, C.F., 2000. Economic analysis of social interactions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, 115–136.

Murphy, K.M., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1993. Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? American Economic Review 83, 409–414.

Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., 2008. The strength of weak ties in crime. European Economic Review 52, 209–236.

Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., 2012. Juvenile delinquency and conformism. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation 28, 1–31.

Rasmusen, E., 1996. Stigma and self-fulfilling expectations of criminality. Journal of Law and Economics 39, 519–543.

Reyniers, D., & Bhalla, R. (2013). Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1), 7-15.

Sah, R.K., 1991. Social osmosis and patterns of crime. Journal of Political Economy 99, 1272–1295.

Sasaki, S. (2019). Majority size and conformity behavior in charitable giving: Field evidence from a donation-based crowdfunding platform in Japan. Journal of Economic Psychology, 70, 36-51.

Schildberg–Hörisch, H., Strassmair, C., 2010. An experimental test of the deterrence hypothesis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation 26, 1–13.

Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2009). A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. The economic journal, 119(540), 1422-1439.

Shoji, M. (2018). Incentive for risk sharing and trust formation: experimental and survey evidence from Bangladesh. Oxford Economic Papers, 70(4), 1062-1083.

Shoji, M. (2020). Guilt and Prosocial Behavior: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence from Bangladesh, Economic Development and Cultural Change, forthcoming.

Sliwka, D., 2007. Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. The American Economic Review 97, 999–1012.

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1231.

Vanberg, C, 2008. Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76, 1467–1480.

Wilson, J.Q., Kelling, G.L., 2003. Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. In: McLaughlin, E., Muncie, J., Hughes, G. (Eds.). Criminological Perspectives: Essential Readings, Trowbridge, Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.

Zafar, B., 2011. An experimental investigation of why individuals conform. European Economic Review 55, 774–798.

Zenou, Y., 2003. The spacial aspects of crime. Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 459–467.