Workplace Choice, Commuting Costs, and Wage Taxation in Urban and Adjacent Rural Regions

Batabyal, Amitrajeet and Nijkamp, Peter (2019): Workplace Choice, Commuting Costs, and Wage Taxation in Urban and Adjacent Rural Regions.

Abstract

We analyze the impact of wage taxation on the workplace choices of and the commuting costs borne by individuals in an aggregate economy consisting of an urban and an adjacent rural region. This economy is inhabited by a continuum of individuals who are uniformly distributed with a total mass of one. These individuals choose whether to work in the urban or in the rural region. The wage is higher (lower) in the urban (rural) region. Our analysis leads to three findings. First, assuming that individuals work in the region in which their after-tax wage net of commuting costs is the highest, we compute the equilibrium number of workers in each region. Second, supposing that the rural region’s median voter works in the urban region, we determine the Nash equilibrium in taxes and ask whether either of the two regions ought to tax or to subsidize the wage. Finally, assuming that the rural region’s median voter works in the rural region, we solve for the Nash equilibrium in taxes and show that optimality calls for the urban and the rural governments to subsidize the two wages.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Commuting Cost, Rural Region, Urban Region, Wage Taxation, Workplace Choice
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R49 - Other

References

Alberto, A.F., and Glaeser, E.L. 1995. Trade and circuses: Explaining urban giants, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 195-227.

Almeida, R., Orr, L., and Robalino, D. 2014. Wage subsidies in developing countries as a tool to build human capital: Design and implementation issues, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 3, 1-24.

Basile, R., and Lim, J. 2017. Nonlinearities in international migration behavior: Evidence from the United States, International Regional Science Review, 40, 563-589.

Batabyal, A.A. 2018. A note on local public good induced spillovers between a leading and a lagging region, Regional Science Inquiry, 10, 11-16.

Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2015. Knowledge goods, ordinary goods, and the effects of trade between leading and lagging regions, Research Policy, 44, 1537-1542.

Batabyal, A.A., and Nijkamp, P. 2014a. Some properties of the technology gap between leading and lagging regions, Theoretical Economics Letters, 4, 1-6.

Batabyal, A.A., and Nijkamp, P. 2014b. Technology, learning, and long run economic growth in leading and lagging regions, Economic and Political Weekly, 49, 92-96.

Bayoh, I., Irwin, E.G., and Haab, T. 2006. Determinants of residential location choice: How important are local public goods in attracting homeowners to central city locations? Journal of Regional Science, 46, 97-120.

Bettencourt, L.M.A. 2013. The origins of scaling in cities, Science, 340, 1438-1441.

Beeson, P., Shore-Sheppard, L., and Watson, T. 2010. Local fiscal policies and urban wage structures, Public Finance Review, 38, 540-584.

Bosworth, G., and Venhorst, V. 2018. Economic linkages between urban and rural regions---what’s in it for the rural? Regional Studies, 52, 1075-1085.

Bucci, G.A. 1993. Explaining urban-rural income and wage differentials: A study using aggregate data for India, Journal of Applied Economics, 25, 1167-1174.

Cass, O. 2018. The Once and Future Worker. Encounter Books, New York, NY.

Dixit, A.K. 1970. Growth patterns in a dual economy, Oxford Economic Papers, 22, 229-234.

Ferreira, J., Ramos, P., Cruz, L., and Barata, E. 2018. The opportunity costs of commuting: The value of a commuting satellite account framework with an example from Lisbon metropolitan area, Economic Systems Research, 30, 105-119.

Gramlich, E., and Rubinfield, D. 1982. Microestimates of public spending demand and test of the Tiebout and median voter hypotheses, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 536-560.

Hall, S.A., Kaufman, J.S., and Ricketts, T.C. 2006. Defining urban and rural areas in U.S. epidemiological studies, Journal of Urban Health, 83, 162-175.

Hindriks, J., and Myles, G.D. 2013. Intermediate Public Economics, 2nd edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Jordan, M.M., Chapman, D., and Wrobel, S.L. 2014. Rich districts, poor districts: The property tax equity impact of Arkansas school finance equalization, Public Finance and Management, 14, 399-415.

Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., and Stough, R. Eds. 2015. The Rise of the City. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

Korzhenevych, A., and Jain, M. 2018. Area- and gender-based commuting differentials in India’s largest urban-rural region, Transportation Research Part D, 63, 733-746.

Leung, C., Sarpca, S., and Yilmaz, K. 2012. Public housing units vs. housing vouchers: Accessibility, local public goods, and welfare, Journal of Housing Economics, 21, 310-321.

Lewis, W.A. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22, 139-191.

Matha, T., and Wintr, L. 2009. Commuting flows across bordering regions: A note, Applied Economics Letters, 16, 735-738.

Sen, A.K. 1966. Peasants and dualism with or without surplus labor, Journal of Political Economy, 74, 425-450.

Sharma, A., and Chandrasekhar, S. 2014. Growth of the urban shadow, spatial distribution of economic activities, and commuting by workers in rural and urban India, World Development, 61, 154-166.

Yamamoto, D. 2008. Scales of regional income disparities in the USA, 1955-2003, Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 79-103.