Spash, Clive L. (2008): Ecosystems Services Valuation. Published in: Environmental Values , Vol. 17, No. 2 (2008): pp. 259-284.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_101233.pdf Download (108kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Ecosystems are being characterised as goods and services to allow their valuation in monetary terms. This follows an orthodox economic approach to environmental values, but is also being undertaken by ecologists and conservation biologist. There appears a lack of clarity and debate as to the model of human behaviour, specific values and decision process being adopted. Arguments for ecosystems service valuation are critically appraised and the case for a model leading to value pluralism is presented. The outcome is to identify the need for value articulating processes which involve open deliberative judgment. In discussion of human motivations and judgement I make specific appeal to the works of philosopher Alan Holland.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Ecosystems Services Valuation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Ecosystems; Economic valuation; Environmental values; Biodiversity; Conservation; Deliberation; Value pluralism; Preferences; Cost-benefit analysis; Public policy; Ethics |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H40 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 101233 |
Depositing User: | Clive L. Spash |
Date Deposited: | 19 Jun 2020 02:56 |
Last Modified: | 19 Jun 2020 02:56 |
References: | Abt Associates Inc (2005) Introduction and summary of major issues. Benefit Transfer and Valuation Databases: Are We Heading in the Right Direction. 21-22 March, Washington DC.: 1:1-1:3. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E., Radner, R. and Schuman, H. (1993) Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Washington, Resources for the Future. 38. Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R.E., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J., Munro, K., Myers, N., Naeem, S., Paavola, J., Rayment, M., Rosendo, S., Roughgarden, J., Trumper, K. and Turner, R.K. (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297: 950-953. Barkmann, J., Glenk, K., Keil, A., Leemhuis, C., Dietrich, N., Gerold, G. and Marggraf, R. (2008) Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preferences. Ecological Economics 65(1): 48-62. Barry, J. (2006) Environment and Social Theory, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemioglu, E., Pearce, D.W., Sugden, R. and Swanson, J. (eds.). (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Batker, D., Barclay, E., Boumans, R., Hathaway, T., Burgess, E., Shaw, D. and Liu, S. (2005) Ecosystem Services Enhanced by Salmon Habitat Conservation in the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed. Tacoma, Asia Pacific Environmental Exchange. Brauman, K.A., Daily, G.C., Ka'eo Duarte, T. and Monney, H.A. (2007) The nature and value of ecosystems services: An overview highlighting hydrological services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 67-98. Brouwer, R. and Spanninks, F.A. (1999) The validity of environmental benefits transfer: Further empirical testing. Environmental and Resource Economics 14(1): 95-117. Butler, W.F. and Acott, T.G. (2007) An inquiry concerning the acceptance of intrinsic value theories of Nature. Environmental Values 16(2). Claro, E. (2007) Exchange relationships and the environment: The acceptability of compensation in the siting of wastes disposal facilities. Environmental Values 16(2). Costanza, R. (2006) Nature: ecosystems without commodifying them. Nature 443 (19 October): 749. Costanza, R., dArge, R., deGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., ONeill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. and van den Belt, M. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630): 253-260. Craig, P.P., Glasser, H. and Kempton, W. (1993) Ethics and values in environmental policy: The said and the UNCED. Environmental Values 2(2): 137-158. Frey, B.S. and Jegen, R. (2001) Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 15(5): 589-611. Getzner, M., Spash, C.L. and Stagl, S. (2005) Alternatives for Environmental Valuation. London: Routledge. Hanley, N.D. (1995) The Role of Environmental Valuation in Cost-Benefit Analysis. In Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives. K. G. Willis and J. T. Corkindale (eds.). Wallingford: CAB International: 39-55. Hanley, N.D., Mourato, S. and Wright, R.E. (2001) Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys 15(3): 435-462. Heal, G.M., Barbier, E.E., Boyle, K.J., Covich, A.P., Gloss, S.P., Hershner, C.H., Hoehn, J.P., Pringle, C.M., Polasky, S., Segerson, K. and Shrader-Frechette, K. (2005) Valuing Ecosystems Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. Washington DC.: National Research Council. Holland, A. (1994) One wants and one wants not to want. Environmental Values 3(1): 1-2. Holland, A. (1995) The assumptions of cost-benefit analysis: A philosopher's view. In Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives. K. G. Willis and J. T. Corkindale (eds.). Wallingford: CAB International: 21-38. Holland, A. (1997) The foundations of environmental decision-making. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 7(4): 483-496. Holland, A. (2002) Are Choices Tradeoffs? In Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices. D. W. Bromley and J. Paavola (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 17-34. Holland, A. and Roxbee-Cox, J. (1992) The valuing of environmental goods: A modest proposal. In Valuing the Environment. A. Coker and C. Richards (eds.). Belhaven Press: 12-24. Hunt, E.K. and d'Arge, R.C. (1973) On lemmings and other acquisitive animals: Propositions on consumption. Journal of Economic Issues 7: 337-353. Kallis, G., Videira, N., Antunes, P., Guimarães Pereira, Â., Spash, C.L., Coccossis, H., Corral Quintana, S., del Moral, L., Hatzilacou, D., Lobo, G., Mexa, A., Paneque, P., Pedregal, B. and Santos, R. (2006) Participatory methods for water resource planning. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy 24(2): 215-234. Kapp, K.W. (1950) The Social Costs of Private Enterprise. New York: Shocken. Maresová, J. and Frynta, D. (2008) Noah's Ark is full of common species attractive to humans: The case of boid snakes in zoos. Ecological Economics 64(3): 554-558. McCauley, D.J. (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443(7): 27-28. O'Neill, J. (2001) Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy (4): 483-500. Pearce, D., Markandya, A. and Barbier, E.B. (1989) Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan. Pigou, A.C. (1920) The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan. Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation. New York/Toronto: Rinehart and Company Inc. Rolston III, H. (1988) Environmental Ethics: Duties and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press. Samples, K.C., Dixon, J.A. and Gowen, M.M. (1986) Information disclosure and endangered species valuation. Land Economics 62(3): 306-312. Smith, A. (1759) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Spash, C.L. (1995) The International Regulation of Extinction - Swanson,Tim. Economic Journal 105(432): 1318-1321. Spash, C.L. (1997) Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 50(4): 403-416. Spash, C.L. (1998) Investigating individual motives for environmental action: Lexicographic preferences, beliefs and attitudes. In Ecological Sustainability and Integrity: Concepts and Approaches. J. Lemons, L. Westra and R. Goodland (eds.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 13: 46-62. Spash, C.L. (2000a) Ethical motives and charitable contributions in contingent valuation: Empirical evidence from social psychology and economics. Environmental Values 9(4): 453-479. Spash, C.L. (2000b) Multiple value expression in contingent valuation: Economics and ethics. Environmental Science and Technology 34(8): 1433-1438. Spash, C.L. (2002a) Greenhouse Economics: Value and Ethics. London: Routledge. Spash, C.L. (2002b) Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: Coral reef biodiversity. Journal of Economic Psychology 23(5): 665-687. Spash, C.L. (2006) Non-economic motivation for contingent values: Rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Economics 82(4): 602-622. Spash, C.L. (2007a) Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecological Economics 63(4): 690-699. Spash, C.L. (2007b) The economics of climate change impacts à la Stern: Novel and nuanced or rhetorically restricted? Ecological Economics 63(4): 706-713. Spash, C.L. (2007c) The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Environmental Values 16(4): 532-535. Spash, C.L. (2008a) Contingent valuation design and data treatment: If you can't shoot the messenger, change the message. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy 26(1): 34-53. Spash, C.L. (2008b) Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV) and evidence for a new theory of value. Land Economics forthcoming. Spash, C.L. and Hanley, N. (1995) Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. Ecological Economics 12(3): 191-208. Spash, C.L., Urama, K., Burton, R., Kenyon, W., Shannon, P. and Hill, G. (2008) Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics: forthcoming. Spash, C.L. and Vatn, A. (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60: 379-388. Vatn, A. (2005) Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/101233 |