Revealed Deliberate Preference Changes

Boissonnet, Niels and Ghersengorin, Alexis and Gleyze, Simon (2020): Revealed Deliberate Preference Changes.

Abstract

We propose a model of chosen preferences together with conditions on choice data that falsify and identify our model. Preferences on alternatives are defined on attributes—e.g. candidates for a job may be experienced or inexperienced. Choice behavior is driven by a subset of attributes. Whenever an attribute becomes salient, the decision maker chooses to make it relevant or irrelevant for her future choices—e.g. employers may deliberately ignore race in the future to prevent discrimination. We identify when this decision is based on the maximization of a meta-preference, implying that preference changes are deliberate. This shows that theories of endogenous preferences, motivated reasoning, evolving attention, changing awareness, etc. can be empirically founded. Moreover, the model can rationalize heterogeneity in choice behavior even under the testable hypothesis that agents' preferences and meta-preferences are identical.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Revealed Preference Theory, Reason-Based Choice, Endogenous Preferences, Awareness, Inattention, Changing Tastes
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D80 - General

References

Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and Identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3):715–753.

Apesteguia, J. and Ballester, M. A. (2015). A Measure of Rationality and Welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 123(6):1278–1310.

Arneson, R. J. (1989). Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 56(1):77–93.

Becker, G. S. and Mulligan, C. B. (1997). The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3):729–758.

Bernheim, B. D., Braghieri, L., Martinez-Marquina, A., and Zuckerman, D. (2019). A Theory of Chosen Preferences. Working Paper.

Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A. (2009). Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice- Theoretic Foundations for BehavioralWelfare Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1):51–104.

Boissonnet, N. (2019). Rationalizing Preference Formation by Partial Deliberation. Working Paper.

Bouacida, E. (2019). Eliciting Choice Correspondences A General Method and an Experimental Implementation. Working Paper.

Chambers, C. P. and Hayashi, T. (2012). Choice and IndividualWelfare. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(5):1818–1849.

Cherepanov, V., Feddersen, T., and Sandroni, A. (2013). Rationalization. Theoretical Economics, 8(3):775–800.

Chetty, R., Looney, A., and Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence. American economic review, 99(4):1145–77.

De Clippel, G. and Eliaz, K. (2012). Reason-Based Choice: A Bargaining Rationale for the Attraction and Compromise Effects. Theoretical Economics, 7(1):125–162.

Dekel, E., Lipman, B. L., and Rustichini, A. (1998). Recent Developments in Modeling Unforeseen Contingencies. European Economic Review, 42(3-5):523– 542.

Dekel, E., Lipman, B. L., and Rustichini, A. (2009). Temptation-Driven Preferences. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(3):937–971.

Dietrich, F. (2018). Savage’s Theorem under Changing Awareness. Journal of Economic Theory, 176:1–54.

Dietrich, F. and List, C. (2013a). A Reason-Based Theory of Rational Choice. Nous, 47(1):104–134.

Dietrich, F. and List, C. (2013b). Where Do Preferences Come From? International Journal of Game Theory, 42(3):613–637.

Dietrich, F. and List, C. (2016). Reason-Based Choice and Context-Dependence: An Explanatory Framework. Economics & Philosophy, 32(2):175–229.

Dutta, P., Murgai, R., Ravallion, M., and van deWalle, D. (2014). Right toWork?: Assessing India’s Employment Guarantee Scheme in Bihar. The World Bank.

Exley, C. L. (2016). Excusing Selfishness in Charitable Giving: The Role of Risk. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(2):587–628.

Grune-Yanoff, T. and Hansson, S. (2009). Preference change: an introduction. In Till Grune-Yanoff and Sven Ove Hansson, editor, Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology, pages 1–26.

Gul, F. and Pesendorfer, W. (2001). Temptation and Self-Control. Econometrica, 69(6):1403–1435.

Gul, F. and Pesendorfer, W. (2005). The Revealed Preference Theory of Changing Tastes. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(2):429–448.

Kalai, G., Rubinstein, A., and Spiegler, R. (2002). Rationalizing Choice Functions by Multiple Rationales. Econometrica, 70(6):2481–2488.

Karni, E. and Vierø, M.-L. (2013). “Reverse Bayesianism”: A Choice-Based Theory of Growing Awareness. American Economic Review, 103(7):2790–2810.

Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2):132–157.

Manzini, P. and Mariotti, M. (2007). Sequentially Rationalizable Choice. American Economic Review, 97(5):1824–1839.

Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., and Ozbay, E. Y. (2012). Revealed Attention. American Economic Review, 102(5):2183–2205.

Nielsen, K. and Rehbeck, J. (2020). When Choices are Mistakes. Working Paper.

Nishimura, H. (2018). The Transitive Core: Inference ofWelfare from Nontransitive Preference Relations. Theoretical Economics, 13(2):579–606.

Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., and Riella, G. (2015). Revealed (P)reference Theory. American Economic Review, 105(1):299–321.

Palacios-Huerta, I. and Santos, T. J. (2004). A Theory of Markets, Institutions, and Endogenous Preferences. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3-4):601–627.

Peleg, B. and Yaari, M. E. (1973). On the Existence of a Consistent Course of Action when Tastes are Changing. The Review of Economic Studies, 40(3):391– 401.

Salant, Y. and Rubinstein, A. (2008). (A,f): Choice with Frames. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(4):1287–1296.

Sarver, T. (2008). Anticipating Regret: Why Fewer Options may be Better. Econometrica, 76(2):263–305.

Shafir, E., Simonson, I., and Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-Based Choice. Cognition, 49(1-2):11–36.

Simonson, I. (1989). Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2):158–174.

Strotz, R. H. (1955). Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(3):165–180.

Tversky, A. and Simonson, I. (1993). Context-Dependent Preferences. Management Science, 39(10):1179–1189. 42