Innovative activity and some features of taxation

Pushkareva, Lyudmila and Pushkarev, Mikhail (2020): Innovative activity and some features of taxation. Published in: E3S Web of Conferences No. 164 (5 May 2020): p. 10027.

Abstract

Innovation activity at an industrial enterprise is a set of conditions affecting the relationship of the interaction of the business structure with other business entities and the state. The environment of innovative activity at the enterprise is variable, heterogeneous, dependent on many positive or negative factors acting on it. The ratio of these factors makes the environment either favorable, i.e. conducive to the implementation of entrepreneurial innovative ideas or adverse (risky) for the normal development of innovation. In the coming years, the structure of sources of financing technological innovation in industry will not change significantly, therefore it is important to create such conditions for organizations so that they can finance innovation in the future. In this significant role belongs to taxes. There are a number of articles in the Tax Code, a slight change of which will create a more favorable climate for innovation. In some cases, it is important for a taxpayer to receive a deferral or installment plan for a tax payment. Investment tax credit also represents a deferred payment; it can be granted to organizations that perform R&D; either technical re-equipment of own production; or carry out innovative or innovative activities, including creating new or improving applied technologies, etc.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Innovative activity; taxation.
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

References

1. W. Strielkowski, E. Volkova, L. Pushkareva, D. Energies 12(7), 1392 (2019).

2. I. Skvortsova, Y. Nurulin, MATEC Web of Conferences 170, 01004 (2018).

3. L. Pushkareva, O. Galochkina, O. Bezgacheva, Current trends in the banking system of Russia (2018)

4. T. Gorokhova, L. Pushkareva, M. Sredin, M. Pushkarev. E3S Web of Conferences 135, 04069 (2019). DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/201913504069.

5. J. P. Walsh, H. Huang, Research Policy 43(2), 245-260 (2014)

6. A. Chunikhin, E. A. Kuzmin, L. V. Pushkareva, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 6(4), 1663–1679 (2019). DOI:10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(8)

7. Y. Chen, K. Ramamurthy, K. W. Wen, Journal of Management Information Systems 29(3), 157-188 (2012)

8. O. V. Voronkova, A. A. Kurochkina, I. P. Firova, T. V. Bikezina, Revista ESPACIOS 38(49), 29 (2017)

9. M. Orlova, A. Khafizova, Life Science Journal 11(11), 328-333 (2014).

10. V. Alpatov, MATEC Web of Conferences 86, 02020 (2016). DOI:10.1051/matecconf/20168602020

11. E. Cohen, EIB papers 11(1), 84-106 (2006) E3S Web of Conferences 164, 10027 (2020) TPACEE-2019 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /202016410027

12. P. M. Senge, G. Carstedt, P. L. Porter, MIT Sloan management review, 42(2), 24-38 (2001)

13. E. M. Kryukova, E. A. Vetrova, A. N. Maloletko, O. V. Kaurova, S. V. Dusenko, Asian Social Science 11(1), 258 (2015)

14. D. Gliaubicas, Economics and management 17(1), 22-29 (2012).

15. S. Y. Bodrunov, Journal of New Economy 20(1), 5-12 (2019).

16. Y. V. Morozyuk, A. V. Sharkova, I. A. Merkulina, O. N. Vasilyeva, Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism 8(3), 507-515 (2017)

17. H. Vasylevska, I. Novosad, A. Kovalenko, Contemporary Economy 9(4), 39-49 (2018).

18. O. Roy, Innovation and economic research 7(2), 7-17 (2019).

19. Y. B. Mindlin, S. V. Novikov, S. V. Kireev, A. A. Adamenko, O. V. Belitskaya, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6(8S), 251-256 (2016)