Haraguchi, Junichi and Matsumura, Toshihiro (2020): Common Ownership among Private Firms and Privatization Policies.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_102152.pdf Download (98kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between the optimal privatization policy and the degree of common ownership among private firms by formulating a mixed oligopoly model in which one public firm competes against private firms under common ownership. We find that depending on the private firms' cost structure, one of the following three patterns emerges: (a) the optimal degree of privatization is increasing in the degree of common ownership, (b) the optimal degree of privatization is decreasing in the degree of common ownership, (c) an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between the two. If the marginal cost of private firms is constant, then (b) always emerges, regardless of whether the marginal cost of the public firm is increasing or constant. However, if the marginal cost of private firms is increasing, then all three patterns can emerge. Our results suggest that the property of the optimal privatization policy depends crucially on the cost structure of private firms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Common Ownership among Private Firms and Privatization Policies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | overlapping ownership, optimal degree of privatization, mixed oligopolies, relative profit maximization, payoff interdependence |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises |
Item ID: | 102152 |
Depositing User: | Junichi Haraguchi |
Date Deposited: | 31 Jul 2020 08:46 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jul 2020 08:46 |
References: | Anderson, J., Lee, Y., Murrell, P. (2000). Competition and privatization amidst weak institutions: evidence from Mongolia. Economic Inquiry, 38(4), 527-549. Azar, J., Schmalz, M. C., Tecu, I. (2018). Anti-competitive effects of common ownership. Journal of Finance 73(4), 1513--1565. Backus, M., Conlon, C., Sinkinson, M. (2019). Common ownership in America: 1980--2017. NBER Working Paper No.25454 Barcena-Ruiz, J. C., Garzon, M. B.(2005a). Economic integration and privatization under diseconomies of scale. European Journal of Political Economy 21(1), 247--267. Barcena-Ruiz, J. C., Garzon, M. B.(2005b). International trade and strategic privatization. Review of Development Economics 9(4), 502--513. Corneo, G., Jeanne, O. (1994). Oligopole mixte dans un marche commun. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 33, 73--90. De Fraja, G., Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers 41(2), 302--311. Elhauge, E. (2016). Horizontal shareholding. Harvard Law Review 109, 1267--1317. Fjell, K., Pal, D. (1996). A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Canadian Journal of Economics 29(3), 737--743. Fridman, A (2018). Partial privatization in an exhaustible resource industry. Journal of Economics 124(2), 159--173. Futagami, K., Matsumura, T., Takao. K. (2019) Mixed duopoly: Differential game approach. Journal of Public Economic Theory 21(4):771--793. Gupta, N. (2005). Partial privatization and firm performance. Journal of Finance, 60(2), 987--1015 Haraguchi, J., Matsumura, T. (2020a). Lack of commitment to future privatization policies may lead to worst welfare outcome. Economic Modelling 88, 181--187. Haraguchi, J., Matsumura, T. (2020b). Implicit protectionism via state enterprises and technology transfer from foreign enterprises. Review of International Economics, 28(3), 723--743. Haraguchi, J., Matsumura, T. (2020c). Asymmetry among private firms and optimal privatization policy. Bulletin of Economic Research, 72(3), 213--224. Haraguchi, J., Matsumura, T. (2020d). Endogenous public and private leadership with diverging social and private marginal costs. Forthcoming in Manchester School. Heywood, J. S. and Ye, G. (2009). Mixed oligopoly, sequential entry, and spatial price discrimination. Economic Inquiry 47(3), 589--597. Huang, C. H., Yang, C. H. (2016) Ownership, trade, and productivity in Vietnam's manufacturing firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 23(3), 356--371. Huang, Z., Li, L., Ma G., Xu, L, C. (2017) Hayek, local in-formation, and commanding heights: Decentralizing state-owned enterprises in China. American Economic Review 107(8), 2455--2478. Kawasaki, A., Okawa, T., Okamura, M. (2020). Endogenous timing game in a mixed duopoly with partial foreign ownership and asymmetric increasing marginal costs. Forthcoming in Australian Economic Papers. Kim, S.-L., Lee, S.-H., Matsumura, T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 128(1), 67--89. Kowalski, P., Buge, M., Sztajerowska, M., Egeland, M. (2013). State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications. OECD Trade Policy Papers. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. Journal of Finance 57(1), 265--301. Lahiri, S., Ono, Y. (1988). Helping minor firms reduces welfare. Economic Journal 98, 1199--1202. Lee S. H., Matsumura, T., Sato, S. (2018) An analysis of entry-then-privatization model: welfare and policy implications. Journal of Economics 123(1):71--88. Lin, M. H., Matsumura, T. (2012) Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy. Journal of Economics 107(1), 71--80. Liu, L., Wang, H. X, Zeng, C. (2020) Endogenous horizontal product differentiation in a mixed duopoly. Review of Industrial Organization 56(3), 435--462. Lopez, A. L., Vives, X. (2019) Overlapping ownership, R\&D spillovers, and antitrust policy. Journal of Political Economy 127(5), 2394--2437. Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics 70(3), 473--483. Matsumura, T., Kanda, O. (2005). Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. Journal of Economics 84(1), 27--48. Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N. (2004). Endogenous cost differentials between public and private enterprises: a mixed duopoly approach. Economica 71:671--688. Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N. (2012). Competitiveness and stability of collusive behavior. Bulletin of Economic Research 64(s1), s22--s31. Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N., Cato, S. (2013). Competitiveness and R\&D competition revisited. Economic Modelling 31(1), 541--547. Matsumura, T., Okamura, M. (2015). Competition and privatization policies revisited: The payoff interdependence approach. Journal of Economics 116(2), 137--150. Matsumura, T., Shimizu, D. (2010). Privatization waves. Manchester School 78(6), 609--625. Megginson, W., Netter, J. M. (2001). From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature 39(2):321--389. Mujumdar, S., Pal, D. (1998). Effects of indirect taxation in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters 58(2), 199--204. Ogura, Y. (2018). The objective function of government-controlled banks in a financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance 89, 78--93. Pal, D. (1998). Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters 61(2), 181--185. Pal, D., White, M. D. (1998). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Economic Journal 65(2), 264--281. Sato, S., Matsumura, T.(2019a) Dynamic privatization policy. Manchester School 87(1), 37--59. Sato, S., Matsumura, T. (2019b). Shadow cost of public funds and privatization policies. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 50, 101026. Sato, S., Matsumura, T. (2019c). Free entry under common ownership. MPRA Paper No. 97525. Schmalz, M. C. (2018). Common-ownership concentration and corporate conduct. Annual Review of Financial Economics 10, 413--448. Seim, K., Waldfogel, J. (2013). Public monopoly and economic efficiency: Evidence from the Pennsylvania liquor control board's entry decisions. American Economic Review 103(2), 831--862. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/102152 |