A new framework of analysis of Political Risk in OECD Countries

syed, irfan (2020): A new framework of analysis of Political Risk in OECD Countries.

Abstract

The motivation behind this paper is to present another model of investigation that – mulling over current ideas of political risk and present day speculations of globalization – incorporates in a thorough system the more conventional factors of political risk with another transnational variable.

Political Risk Analysis (PRA) is the expository control that attempts to make a sensible system of data on the risk profile for undertakings working and putting resources into far off nations. Political Risk Analysis, by its own one of a kind definition, centers around non – commercial risks, that is, risks emerging from the socio – political environment of a given Country.

The idea of political risk and the investigation methodology embraced and utilized in PRA are incredibly heterogeneous, fluctuating significantly one case at a time case. Anyway a typical example can be recognized. In pretty much every definition or operational idea of political risk, the spotlight depends as a rule on the interior measurement. The models created by both open and private offices and institutions tend in certainty to put together their models with respect to factors and markers inward to the nation object of the examination.

As we would like to think this methodology is restricted. In the present globalized and regularly evolving world, we feel that in any political risk examination model it is major to incorporate a transnational point of view. A transnational variable ought to likewise be made so as to supplement the national variable by weighting the impacts of the universal and worldwide measurement on nearby and national socio-political occasions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: political risk governance institutional quality risk country
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe; P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems

References

Al Khattab, A., Anchor, J., & Davies, E. (2007). Managerial perceptions of political risk in international projects. International Journal of Project Management, 25(7), 734-743.

Alesina, A., De Broeck, M., Prati, A., & Tabellini, G. (1992). Default risk on government debt in OECD countries. Economic policy, 7(15), 427-463.

Asteriou, D. (2016). Political instability and stock market returns: Evidence from OECD countries.

Baghdadli, I., Harborne, R., & Rajadel, T. M. (Eds.). (2008). Breaking the cycle: A strategy for conflict-sensitive rural growth in Burundi. The World Bank.

Busemeyer, M. R. (2012). Inequality and the political economy of education: An analysis of individual preferences in OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 219-240.

Butler, K. C., & Joaquin, D. C. (1998). A note on political risk and the required return on foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 599-607.

Elleuch, N., Zorgui, I. and Jaouadi, S. (2015), “Examination of the impact of political and country risk on foreign direct investment inflows in Tunisia”, European Academic Research, Vol 2, issue 11, pp: 14434 – 14445.

Erb, C. B., Harvey, C. R., & Viskanta, T. E. (1996). Political risk, economic risk, and financial risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 52(6), 29-46.

Gordon, K. (2008). Investment guarantees and political risk insurance: institutions, incentives and development. OECD Investment Policy Perspectives, 95-103.

Guner, S., & Coskun, E. (2012). Comparison of impacts of economic and social factors on countries' logistics performances: a study with 26 OECD countries. Research in Logistics & Production, 2, 330-343.

Hessami, Z. (2014). Political corruption, public procurement, and budget composition: Theory and evidence from OECD countries. European Journal of political economy, 34, 372-389.

Høj, J., Galasso, V., Nicoletti, G., & Dang, T. T. (2006). The political economy of structural reform: empirical evidence from OECD countries.

Ilmakunnas, P., & Kanniainen, V. (2001). Entrepreneurship, economic risks, and risk insurance in the welfare state: Results with OECD data 1978–93. German Economic Review, 2(3), 195-218.

Jaouadi, S., Arfaoui, L., & Ziedi, A. (2014). Political instability and growth: case of the developing countries. International Journal of Social Science Research, 2(1), 19-28.

Jensen, N. (2008). Political risk, democratic institutions, and foreign direct investment. The Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1040-1052.

Jensen, N. (2008). Political risk, democratic institutions, and foreign direct investment. The Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1040-1052.

Kaplan, E. A., & Akçoraoğlu, A. (2017). Political instability, corruption, and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Business and Economics Research Journal, 8(3), 363.

Khemiri, S., & Zorgui, I. (2015). Examination of the aspects of country risk : evidence from cointegration relationship. International Journal of Statistics and Economics, 16, 10-19.

Kobrin, S. J. (1979). Political risk: A review and reconsideration. Journal of international business studies, 10(1), 67-80.

Le, Q. V., & Zak, P. J. (2006). Political risk and capital flight. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(2), 308-329.

Piironen, O. (2014). (De) politicizing good governance: the World Bank Institute, the OECD and the politics of governance indicators. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 344-360.