Consumer acceptance and willingness-to-pay for insect-based foods: The role of proximity of insects in the food chain

Giotis, Thomas and Drichoutis, Andreas C. (2020): Consumer acceptance and willingness-to-pay for insect-based foods: The role of proximity of insects in the food chain.

Abstract

Over the last few years, the interest on alternative protein sources, such as edible insects, has been growing rapidly. However, Western consumers' acceptance of insects as a food source is very low, mainly due to unfamiliarity with insect-based food. We investigate consumers' attitude and behavior and estimate their willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for three products that vary on a between-subjects basis, the proximity of insects in the food chain. The data were collected through an online questionnaire of 451 consumers in Greece and WTP was elicited using the Contingent Valuation (CV) method. Our results show that the majority of Greek consumers are not willing to pay a premium for an insect-based energy bar and cookie; on the contrary, they would require a discount to acquire such products. On the other hand, consumer acceptance is higher for a gilt-head bream that is fed with insect-based feed. Consumers with positive WTP are on average willing to pay a premium of 15.8%, 17% and 31.8% for the energy bar, cookie and gilt-head bream, respectively, while consumers that are not WTP a premium would require discounts of 43.8%, 42.4% and 30.7%, respectively.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Consumer acceptance; willingness-to-pay; contingent valuation; cheap talk; insect-based products; insect-based feed
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing ; Cooperatives ; Agribusiness

References

Aadland, D. and A. J. Caplan (2003). Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling with Detection and Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (2), 492-502.

Alemu, M. H. and S. B. Olsen (2020). An analysis of the impacts of tasting experience and peer effects on consumers willingness to pay for novel foods. Agribusiness 36 (4), 653-674.

Barsics, F., R. Caparros Megido, Y. Brostaux, C. Barsics, C. Blecker, E. Haubruge, and F. Francis (2017). Could new information influence attitudes to foods supplemented with edible insects?. British Food Journal. 119 (9), 2027-2039.

Blumenschein, K., G. C. Blomquist, M. Johannesson, N. Horn, and P. Freeman (2007). Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: Evidence from a field experiment. The Economic Journal 118 (525), 114-137.

Brown, T. C., I. Ajzen, and D. Hrubes (2003). Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 (2), 353-361.

Brummett, R. G., J. Rodolfo M. Nayga, and X. Wu (2007). On the use of cheap talk in new product valuation. Economics Bulletin 2 (1), 1-9.

Bulte, E., S. Gerking, J. A. List, and A. de Zeeuw (2005). The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: Evidence from a field study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49 (2), 330-342.

Caparros Megido, R., C. Gierts, C. Blecker, Y. Brostaux, R. Haubruge, T. Alabi, and F. Francis (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in western countries. Food Quality and Preference 52, 237 - 243.

Caparros Megido, R., L. Sablon, M. Geuens, Y. Brostaux, T. Alabi, C. Blecker, D. Drugmand, R. Haubruge, and F. Francis (2014). Edible insects acceptance by belgian consumers: Promising attitude for entomophagy development. Journal of Sensory Studies 29 (1), 14-20.

Carson, R. T. (2012). Contingent valuation: A practical alternative when prices aren't available. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4), 27-42.

Carson, R. T. and W. M. Hanemann (2005). Chapter 17 contingent valuation. In K.-G. Mler and J. R. Vincent (Eds.), Valuing Environmental Changes, Volume 2 of Handbook of Environmental Economics, pp. 821 - 936. Elsevier.

Castro, M. and E. I. Chambers (2019). Willingness to eat an insect based product and impact on brand equity: A global perspective. Journal of Sensory Studies 34 (2), e12486.

Champ, P. A., R. Moore, and R. C. Bishop (2009). A comparison of approaches to mitigate hypothetical bias.

Cochran, W. G. and D. B. Rubin (1973). Controlling bias in observational studies: A review. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A 35 (4), 417-446.

Cummings, R. G., G. W. Harrison, and L. L. Osborne (1995). Can the bias of contingent valuation be reduced? Evidence from the laboratory. College of Business Administration, University of South Carolina, Economics Working Paper B-95-03 3.

Cummings, R. G. and L. O. Taylor (1999). Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. The American Economic Review 89 (3), 649-665.

Drichoutis, A. C., A. Vassilopoulos, J. L. Lusk, and J. R. M. Nayga (2017). Consumer preferences for fair labour certification. European Review of Agricultural Economics 44 (3), 455-474.

Dummett, M. and R. Farquharson (1961). Stability in voting. Econometrica 29 (1), 33-43.

Gahukar, R. (2011). Entomophagy and human food security. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 31 (3), 129144.

Gibbard, A. (1973). Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41 (4), 587-601.

Haab, T. C., M. G. Interis, D. R. Petrolia, and J. C. Whitehead (2013). From hopeless to curious? Thoughts on Hausman's "dubious to hopeless" critique of contingent valuation. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 35 (4), 593-612.

Halloran, A., C. Mnke-Svendsen, A. Van Huis, and P. Vantomme (2014). Insects in the human food chain: global status and opportunities. Food Chain 4, 103-118.

Hartmann, C. and M. Siegrist (2016). Becoming an insectivore: Results of an experiment. Food Quality and Preference 51, 118 - 122.

Henry, M., L. Gasco, G. Piccolo, and E. Fountoulaki (2015). Review on the use of insects in the diet of farmed fish: Past and future. Animal Feed Science and Technology 203, 1 - 22.

House, J. (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the netherlands: Academic and commercial implications. Appetite 107, 47 - 58.

Iaconisi, V., S. Marono, G. Parisi, L. Gasco, L. Genovese, G. Maricchiolo, F. Bovera, and G. Piccolo (2017). Dietary inclusion of tenebrio molitor larvae meal: Effects on growth performance and final quality treats of blackspot sea bream (pagellus bogaraveo). Aquaculture 476, 49 - 58.

Imathiu, S. (2020). Benefits and food safety concerns associated with consumption of edible insects. NFS Journal 18, 1 - 11.

Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin (2016). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences, An introduction. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Imbens, G. W. and J. M. Wooldridge (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47 (1), 5-86.

Johnston, R. J., K. J. Boyle, W. Adamowicz, J. Bennett, R. Brouwer, T. A. Cameron, W. M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, M. Ryan, R. Scarpa, R. Tourangeau, and C. A. Vossler (2017). Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2), 319-405.

Kling, C. L., D. J. Phaneuf, and J. Zhao (2012). From Exxon to BP: Has some number become better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4), 3-26.

Kornher, L., M. Schellhorn, and S. Vetter (2019). Disgusting or innovative-consumer willingness to pay for insect based burger patties in germany. Sustainability 11 (7).

Laureati, M., C. Proserpio, C. Jucker, and S. Savoldelli (2016). New sustainable protein sources: Consumers' willingness to adopt insects as feed and food. 28, 652-668.

Lensvelt, E. J. S. and L. P. A. Steenbekkers (2014). Exploring consumer acceptance of entomophagy: A survey and experiment in australia and the netherlands. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 53 (5), 543-561. PMID: 25105864.

List, J. A. (2001). Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards. American Economic Review 91 (5), 1498-1507.

Loomis, J., T. Brown, B. Lucero, and G. Peterson (1996). Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay. Land Economics, 450-461.

Lusk, J. L. (2003). Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (4), 840-856.

Melgar-Lalanne, G., A.-J. Hernndez-lvarez, and A. Salinas-Castro (2019). Edible insects processing: Traditional and innovative technologies. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 18 (4), 1166-1191.

Menozzi, D., G. Sogari, M. Veneziani, E. Simoni, and C. Mora (2017). Eating novel foods: An application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product. Food Quality and Preference 59, 27-34.

Morrison, M. and T. C. Brown (2009). Testing the effectiveness of certainty scales, cheap talk, and dissonance-minimization in reducing hypothetical bias in contingent valuation studies. Environmental and Resource Economics 44 (3), 307-326.

Murphy, J. J., T. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead (2005). Is cheap talk effective at eliminating hypothetical bias in a provision point mechanism? Environmental and Resource Economics 30 (3), 327-343.

Oonincx, D., S. Van Broekhoven, A. Van Huis, and J. Van Loon (2015). Feed conversion, survival and development, and composition of four insect species on diets composed of food by-products. PLoS ONE 10 (12).

Piccolo, G., V. Iaconisi, S. Marono, L. Gasco, R. Loponte, S. Nizza, F. Bovera, and G. Parisi (2017). Effect of tenebrio molitor larvae meal on growth performance, in vivo nutrients digestibility, somatic and marketable indexes of gilthead sea bream (sparus aurata). Animal Feed Science and Technology 226, 12 - 20.

Poe, G. L., J. E. Clark, D. Rondeau, and W. D. Schulze (2002). Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 23 (1), 105-131.

Ramos-Elorduy, J. (2009). Anthropo-entomophagy: Cultures, evolution and sustainability. Entomological Research 39 (5), 271-288.

RamosElorduy, J. (1997). Insects: A sustainable source of food? Ecology of Food and Nutrition 36 (2-4), 247-276.

Rozin, P. and A. Fallon (1980). The psychological categorization of foods and non-foods: A preliminary taxonomy of food rejections. Appetite 1 (3), 193 - 201.

Rozin, P. and A. E. Fallon (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological review 94 (1), 2341.

Rumpold, B. A. and O. K. Schluter (2013). Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 17, 1-11.

Satterthwaite, M. A. (1975). Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10 (2), 187-217.

Schouteten, J. J., H. De Steur, S. De Pelsmaeker, S. Lagast, J. G. Juvinal, I. De Bourdeaudhuij, W. Verbeke, and X. Gellynck (2016). Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions. Food Quality and Preference 52, 27 - 31.

Sogari, G., D. Menozzi, and C. Mora (2017). Exploring young foodies knowledge and attitude regarding entomophagy: A qualitative study in italy. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 7, 16 - 19.

Sogari, G., D. Menozzi, and C. Mora (2018). Sensory-liking expectations and perceptions of processed and unprocessed insect products. International Journal on Food System Dynamics 9 (4), 314-320.

Svensson, L.-G. and A. Reffgen (2014). The proof of the gibbardsatterthwaite theorem revisited. Journal of Mathematical Economics 55, 11 - 14.

Tan, H. S. G., E. van den Berg, and M. Stieger (2016). The influence of product preparation, familiarity and individual traits on the consumer acceptance of insects as food. Food Quality and Preference 52, 222 - 231.

Van Huis, A. (2013). Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology 58 (1), 563-583. PMID: 23020616.

Van Huis, A. (2016). Edible insects are the future? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 75 (3), 294305.

Van Huis, A., J. Van Itterbeeck, H. Klunder, E. Mertens, A. Halloran, G. Muir, and P. Vantomme (2013). Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. (171).

Van Thielen, L., S. Vermuyten, B. Storms, B. Rumpold, and L. Van Campenhout (2018). Consumer acceptance of foods containing edible insects in belgium two years after their introduction to the market. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 5, 1-10.

Verbeke, W. (2015). Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a western society. Food Quality and Preference 39, 147 - 155.

Vossler, C. A. and J. S. Holladay (2018). Alternative value elicitation formats in contingent valuation: Mechanism design and convergent validity. Journal of Public Economics 165, 133-145.

Wilkinson, K., B. Muhlhausler, C. Motley, A. Crump, H. Bray, and R. Ankeny (2018). Australian consumers awareness and acceptance of insects as food. Insects 9 (2).