Pernia, Ernesto and Kakwani, Nanak (2000): What is Pro-poor Growth? Published in: Asian Development Review , Vol. 18, No. 3 (2000): pp. 1-16.
Preview |
PDF
What is Pro-poor Growth.pdf Download (76kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper attempts to explain the concept of pro-poor growth, and argues that it represents a major departure from the “trickle-down” phenomenon. It proposes a new indicator—the pro-poor growth index—that measures the degree to which growth can be considered to be pro-poor. The new indicator is used to analyze the nature of economic growth in three countries, namely, Lao PDR, Thailand and Korea.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | What is Pro-poor Growth? |
English Title: | What is Pro-poor Growth? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Pro-poor Growth Economic Growth Poverty Reduction Equity and Efficiency Trade-off Lao DPR Thailand Korea |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty |
Item ID: | 104987 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Ernesto Pernia |
Date Deposited: | 15 Jan 2021 01:26 |
Last Modified: | 15 Jan 2021 01:26 |
References: | ARTICLE Kakwani, N., & Pernia, E. M. (2000), What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review, 18(3), 1-16. REFERENCES ADB (1999). Fighting poverty in Asia and the Pacific: The poverty reduction strategy, Manila: Asian Development Bank. Bhagwati, J.N. (1988). Poverty and public policy. World Development, 16(5), 539-654. Chenery, H.B. et al. (1974). Redistribution with growth: Policies to improve income distribution in developing countries in the context of economic growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1992). Growth and redistribution component of changes in poverty measures: A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s. Journal of Development Economics, 38, 275-295. Dollar, D., & A. Kraay (2000). Growth is good for the poor, Washington, DC: World Bank. Institute of Development Studies (1999). Development Research Insights, Sussex: University of Sussex, UK. Kakwani, N. (1993). Performance in living standards: An international comparison. Journal of Development Economics,41(2), 307-36. Kakwani, N. (1999). Poverty and inequality during the economic crisis in Thailand. Indicators of Well-being and Policy Analysis, 3(1). Kakwani, N. (2000). On measuring growth and inequality components of poverty with application to Thailand. Journal of Quantitative Economics (forthcoming). Kakwani, N., & Krongkaew, M. (2000). Analysing poverty in Thailand. Journal of Asia Pacific Economy, 5(1,2), 141-60. McCulloch, N., & Baulch, B. (1999). Assessing the poverty bias of economic growth: Methodology and an application to Andhra Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. Institute of Development Studies Working Paper, Sussex: University of Sussex, UK (draft). Pernia, E. M., & Quibria, M.G. (1999). Poverty in developing countries, in Mills, E. S., & Cheshire, P.C. (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier and North Holland, pp. 1865-1934. Sen, A. (1987). The Standard of Living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. World Bank (1990). World Development Report 1990, New York: Oxford University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/104987 |