Preference for Sex of Children Among Women in Nepal

Sapkota, Jeet Bahadur and Paudel, Damaru Ballabha and Neupane, Pramila and Thapa, Rajesh Bahadur (2018): Preference for Sex of Children Among Women in Nepal. Published in: Global Social Welfare , Vol. 6, (2019): pp. 69-78.

Abstract

The preference for a son at birth is one of the key issues of demographic studies conducted in less developed countries; however, there is a rare exploration of child’s sex preference among women in Nepal. This paper estimates the likelihood of a preference for son or daughter using the 2011 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) data, which contains a nationally representative sample of Nepalese women. A multinomial logistic regression analysis shows that son and daughter preferences widely vary across ethnicities, educational and economic status, and geographical region. Regarding ethnic origin, women from the Janajati (the largest ethnic minority group that consists of many sub-ethnic groups) prefer daughter more than the top two caste groups, the Brahman and Chhetri, whereas the Madhesi, Muslim, and other ethnic minority women prefer son more than the top two caste groups. Similarly, less educated, poorer, and rural women prefer son more than more educated, richer, urban women in general. Women who desire more of either sex end up with more children in their household.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: child’s sex preference; caste/ethnicity; demographic and health survey; multinomial logistic model; gender and demographic studies
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J18 - Public Policy

References

Arnold, F. (1992). Sex preference and its demographic and health implications. International Family Planning Perspectives, 18(3), 93–101. Arnold, F.; Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies, 52(3), 301-315. Arora, S., & Sanditov, B. (2015). Cultures of caste and rural development in the social network of a South Indian Village. Sage Open, 5(3), 2158244015598813. Banerjee, P. R. (2014). Dowry in 21st-century India: the sociocultural face of exploitation. Trauma Violence Abuse 15, 34–40 Bardhan, P. (1982). Little girls and death in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 17(36), 1448–1450. Bennett, L. (2008). Policy reform and culture change: Contesting gender, caste, and ethnic exclusion in Nepal. In Dani, A. A., & de Haan, A. (Eds.). Inclusive states: Social policy and structural inequalities. Washington DC: World Bank Publications. Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., Bradley, R. H., Deater-Deckard, K., & Lansford, J. E. (2016). Gender in Low and Middle Income Countries: Introduction. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 81(1), 7-23. Brunson, J. (2010). Son Preference in the Context of Fertility Decline: Limits to New Constructions of Gender and Kinship in Nepal. Studies in Family Planning, 41(2), 89-98. Center for Research on Environment Health and Population Activities [CREHPA]. (2007). Sex selection: Pervasiveness and preparedness in Nepal. UNFPA. Available: http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/nepal.pdf . Accessed January 29, 2017. Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) (2012). National Population and housing Census Report 2012. Kathmandu: CBS. Cleland, J.; Verall, J. & Vaessen, M. (1983). Preferences for the Sex of Children and Their Influence on Reproductive Behavior. In World Fertility Survey Comparative Studies, Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute, No. 27. Coale, A. J., & Banister, J. (1994). Five decades of missing females in China. Demography, 31(3), 459–479. Dahl, G. B., & Moretti, E. (2008). The demand for sons. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(4), 1085-1120. Das Gupta, M., & Bhat, P. N. M. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies, 51(3), 307–315. Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153-187. Frost, M. D., Puri, M., & Hinde, P. R. A. (2013). Falling sex ratios and emerging evidence of sex-selective abortion in Nepal: evidence from nationally representative survey data. BMJ open, 3(5), e002612. Golley, J., & Tyers, R. (2014). Gender ‘Rebalancing’in China. Asian Population Studies, 10(2), 125-143. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012). Son preference, sex selection, and kinship in Vietnam. Population and Development Review, 38(1), 31-54. ——. (2010). Longer-term disruptions to demographic structures in China and India resulting from skewed sex ratios at birth. Asian Population Studies, 6(1), 3-24. ——. (2009). “The sex ratio transition in Asia.” Population and Development Review 35(3): 519–549. Hesketh, T., Lu, L., & Xing, Z. W. (2011). The consequences of son preference and sex-selective abortion in China and other Asian countries. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 183(12), 1374-1377. Jejeebhoy, S.J.; Acharya, R.; Basu, S.; Francis Zavier, A.J.; Ubaidur Rob; Noorunnabi Talukder, M.; Hossain, M.I.; Forhana Rahman Noor; Sathar, Z.A.; Rashida, G.; Hussain, S.; Hassan, A.; Puri, M. (2015). Gender-biased sex selection and unbalanced sex ratios at birth in South Asia: Case studies of the situation and promising approaches to restore balance. New Delhi: Population Council. Kevane, M. & Levine, D. (2001). “The Changing Status of Daughters in Indonesia,” Working Paper No. 74, Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California, Berkeley. Koolwal, G. B. (2007). Son preference and child labor in Nepal: The household impact of sending girls to work. World Development, 35(5), 881-903. Leone, T., Matthews, Z., & Zuanna, G. D. (2003). Impact and determinants of sex preference in Nepal. International family planning perspectives, 29(2), 69-75. Matejka, F., & McKay, A. (2014). Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. The American Economic Review, 105(1), 272-298. Ministry of Health and Population (2012). Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health and Population, New ERA, and ICF International, Calverton, Maryland. Mutharayappa, R., Choe, M. K., Arnold, F., & Roy, T. K. (1997). Son preference and its effect on fertility in India. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports, Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences, No. 3. National Planning Commission (NPC) of Nepal & United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), (2014). Nepal Human Development Report 2014: Beyond Geography, Unlocking Human Potential. Pulchowk: UNDP Nepal. Niroula, G. (2015). An Evaluation of Nepal's Demographic Transition (Change in Birth Rates and Death Rates) with Reference to the Frank W. Notestein's Demographic Transition Theory. Notestein's Demographic Transition Theory (January 22). Okwechime, I. O., & Roberson, S. (2015). Prevalence and Predictors of Pre-Diabetes and Diabetes among Adults 18 Years or Older in Florida: A Multinomial Logistic Modeling Approach. PloS one, 10(12), e0145781. Pande, R. P., & Astone, N. M. (2007). Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(1), 1-29. Paudel, D. B. (2011). Impact of Social Networks on Labor Migration Decision in Nepal. Journal of Rural Economics special issue 2011, 305-351. Pradhan, A., Aryal, R. H., Regmi, G., Ban, B., & Govindasamy, P. (1997). Demographic and Health Surveys: Nepal Country Report. Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International. Puri, M. & Tamang, A. (2015). Assessment of intervention on sex-selection in Nepal: Literature review. Kathmandu, Nepal: Center for Research on Environment Health and Population Activities (CREHPA). Rutstein, S. (1999). “Wealth versus expenditure: Comparison between the DHS wealth index and household expenditures in four departments of Guatemala”. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro. Sen, A. (1989). “Women’s survival as a development problem,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 43(2): 14–29. ——. (1990). “More than 100 million women are missing,” New York Review of Books 37(20). Available at: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1990/12/20/more-than-100-million-women-are-missing/ (accessed in 9 December 2016). Shakya, K., & Gubhaju, B. (2016). Factors Contributing to Fertility Decline in Nepal. Journal of Population and Social Studies, 24(1), 13-29. World Bank. (2016). World Development Indicators (WDI) online database. Available at: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators# (accessed in 3 July 2016). Zhou, C., Wang, X. L., Zhou, X. D., & Hesketh, T. (2012). Son preference and sex-selective abortion in China: informing policy options. International journal of public health, 57(3), 459-465.