Production and Scale Efficiency of South African Water Utilities: The Case of Water Boards

Ngobeni, Victor and Breitenbach, Marthinus C (2021): Production and Scale Efficiency of South African Water Utilities: The Case of Water Boards.

Abstract

South Africa is a water scarce country with deteriorating water resources. Faced with tight fiscal and water resource constraints, water utilities would have to adopt technically efficient water management technologies to meet developmental socio-economic objectives of universal coverage, aligned to the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6). It is important to measure the technical efficiency of utilities as accurately as possible in order to inform policy. We do this by using a non-parametric method known as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to determine, measure, analyse and benchmark the technical efficiency of all water boards in South Africa. Our contribution to the literature is twofold: This is the first paper to model technical efficiency of water boards as utility suppliers and guardians of water services in South Africa, and second, we address the over- and under estimation issues of technical efficiency measurement in the water sector. We do this by modelling one of the most pronounced negative externalities from water provision (water losses) as an undesirable output using the approach developed by You & Yan (2011). We find on average, technical efficiency of water boards is 49 per cent, with only three of the nine water boards technically efficient. Six of the smaller water boards showed high levels of inefficiency. Six water boards operate at increasing returns to scale (IRS) and two are scale efficient. Only Rand and Sedibeng water boards exhibited decreasing returns to scale (DRS). Therefore, redirecting potential efficiency savings to optimal uses could result in technical and scale efficiency for the sector. Scale efficiency results seems to support larger regional water boards as small to medium-sized water boards are scale inefficient with low technical efficiency. The ratio model with undesirable output outperforms previous methods to deal with undesirable (bad) outputs, which either provide an over- or underestimation of technical efficiency.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Water Boards, Water Losses, Data Envelopment Analysis, Volumes, Tariffs, Expenditure, Technical Efficiency.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity

References

Ali, A. Bashir, M. Munib, M. Saqib, S. and Sami, A. 2018. Assessing the Efficiency of Water and Sanitation Agencies of Punjab, Pakistan: A Benchmarking Approach. Journal of Managerial Sciences, XI (3), pp.245-254.

Alsharif, K. Feroz, E.H. Klemer, A. and Raab, R. 2008. Governance of Water Supply Systems in the Palestinian Territories: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to the Management of Water Resources. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(1), pp.80-94.

Amatola Water. 2019. Integrated Annual Report. 2018/19. Amatola Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 https://www.amatolawater.co.za/files/documents/000/000/032/1579774887_lXyLS_Amatola-Water-AR--2018-19--29.pdf

Aristovnik, A. 2012. The Impact of ICT on Educational Performance and its Efficiency in Selected EU and OECD Countries: A Non-Parametric Analysis.

Avkiran, N.K. 2001. Investigating Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Australian Universities through Data Envelopment Analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), pp.57-80.

Beck, T. Rodina, L. Luker, E. and Harris, L. 2016. Institutional and Policy Mapping of the Water Sector in South Africa. Accessed, 01 January 2020 https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/facultyresearchandpublications/52383/items/1.0366056

Bloem Water. 2019. Annual Report. 2018/19. Bloem Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 https://www.bloemwater.co.za/assets/annual-report-2018-2019-bloem-water.pdf

Breitenbach, M.C. Ngobeni, V. and Aye, G.C. 2020. Global Healthcare Resource Efficiency in the Management of COVID-19 Death and Infection Prevalence Rates. MPRA Working Paper. No. 104814. Accessed, 02 January 2020 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/104814/1/MPRA_paper_104814.pdf

Brettenny, W. and Sharp, G. 2016. Efficiency Evaluation of Urban and Rural Municipal Water Service Authorities in South Africa: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Water SA, 42(1), pp.11-19.

Coelli, T.J. Rao, D.S.P. O’Donnell, C.J. and Battese, G.E. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.

Cooper, W.W., Seiford. L.M. and Tone, K. 2007. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Springer, New York, USA.

Department of Water and Sanitation. 2019. National Water and Sanitation Master Plan. Department of Water and Sanitation. Accessed, 07 June 2020 https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201911/national-water-and-sanitation-master-plandf.pdf

Department of Water and Sanitation. 2018. 2017/18 Annual Report. Department of Water and Sanitation. Accessed, 06 June 2020 https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201810/water-and-sanitation-annual-report.pdf

Dollery, B. and Van der Westhuizen, G. 2009. Efficiency Measurement of Basic Service Delivery at South African District and Local municipalities. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 5(2), p.13.

Dyckhoff, H. and Allen, K. 2001. Measuring Ecological Efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operations Research. 132: 312-325.

Färe R. Grosskopf, S. Lovell, C.A.K. and Pasurka, C. 1989. Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach. Review of Economic Statististics. 71: 90–98. Gannon, B. 2005. Testing for Variation in Technical Efficiency of Hospitals in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, Vol. 36 (3), pp. 273-294.

Gavurova, B. Kocisova, K. Belas, L. and Krajcik, V. 2017. Relative Efficiency of Government Expenditure on Secondary Education. Journal of International Studies 10(2), pp. 329-343.

Golany, B. and Roll, Y. 1989. An Application Procedure for DEA. Omega 17: 237–250.

Guder, J. Kittlau, B. Moll, R. Walter, M. and Zschille, M. 2010. The Performance of German Water Utilities: A First Non-Parametric Analysis. DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research) and Dresden University of Technology Efficiency Analysis Working Papers. Accessed, 07 June 2020 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f7b6/93ea02ed22d2b6ddcf8605fc4ba645d7d027.pdf

Gupta, S., Kumar, S. and Sarangi, G.K. 2012. Measuring the Performance of Water Service Providers in Urban India: Implications for Managing Water Utilities. Water Policy, 14(3), pp.391-408.

Hua, Z. and Bian, Y. 2007. DEA with Undesirable Factors. In: Zhu, J. and Cook, W.D. (eds). Modelling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer Science: Boston, MA, pp 103–121.

Kulshrestha, M. and Vishwakarma, A. 2013. Efficiency Evaluation of Urban Water Supply Services in an Indian State. Water Policy, 15(1), pp.134-152.

Lannier, A.L. and Porcher, S. 2014. Efficiency in the Public and Private French Water Utilities: Prospects for Benchmarking. Applied Economics, 46(5), pp.556-572.

Lauro, A., Dos Santos Figueiredo, O.H. and Wanke, P.F. 2016. Efficiency of Municipal Schools in Rio sde Janeiro: Evidence from Two-Stage DEA. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 17(3), p.147.

Lepelle Northern Water. 2015. Annual Report. 2014/15. Lepelle Northern Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 https://nationalgovernment.co.za/entity_annual/670/2015-lepelle-northern-water-annual-report.pdf

Lombardi, G.V. Stefani, G. Paci, A. Becagli, C. Miliacca, M. Gastaldi, M. Giannetti, B.F. and Almeida, C.M.V.B. 2019. The Sustainability of the Italian Water Sector: An Empirical Analysis by DEA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, pp.1035-1043.

Lu, W.M. and Lo, S.F. 2007a. A Benchmark-Learning Roadmap for Regional Sustainable Development in China. Journal of the Operations Research Society. 58:841–849.

Lu, W.M. and Lo, S.F. 2007b. A Closer Look at the Economic Environmental Disparities for Regional Development in China. European Journal of Operations Research. 183: 882–894.

Magalies Water. 2019. Annual Report. 2018/19. Magalies Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 http://www.magalieswater.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Magalies-Annual-Report-Financial-Year-FY-2018-2019.pdf

Mahabir, J. 2014. Quantifying Inefficient Expenditure in Local Government: A Free Disposable Hull Analysis of a Sample of South African Municipalities. South African Journal of Economics, 82(4), pp.493-517.

Marques, R.C., Berg, S. and Yane, S. 2014. Nonparametric Benchmarking of Japanese Water Utilities: Institutional and Environmental Factors Affecting Efficiency. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(5), pp.562-571.

Martić, M. Novaković, M. and Baggia, A. 2009. Data Envelopment Analysis-Basic Models and their Utilization. Organizacija, 42(2), pp.37-43.

Masindi, V. and Duncker, L.C. 2016. State of Water and Sanitation in South Africa. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Accessed, 07 June 2020 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vhahangwele_Masindi3/publication/311451788_State_of_Water_and_Sanitation_in_South_Africa/links/5846deb508ae61f75ddfdca3/State-of-Water-and-Sanitation-in-South-Africa.pdf

McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. and Van Fleet, D. D. 2005. Scholarly Journals as Producers of Knowledge: Theory and Empirical Evidence Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Organisational Research Methods, 8(2), pp.185-201.

Mhlathuze Water. 2019. Annual Report. 2018/19. Mhlathuze Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 https://www.mhlathuze.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Mhlathuze-Water-AR2019-Ebook.pdf

Monkam, N.F. 2014. Local Municipality Productive Efficiency and its Determinants in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 31(2), pp.275-298.

Murwirapachena, G. Mahabir, J. Mulwa, R. and Dikgang J. 2019. Efficiency in South African Water Utilities: A Comparison of Estimates from DEA, SFA and StoNED. Accessed, 07 June 2020 http://www.academia.edu/download/59324507/working_paper_78020190520-23982-1t5h0qv.pdf

Nakashima, K. Nose, T. and Kuriyama, S. 2006. A New Approach to Environmental-Performance Evaluation. International Journal of Productivity Research. 44:4137–4143.

National Treasury.2020a. Aggregated Municipal 2021 MTREF information. National Treasury. Accessed, 03 January 2021 http://mfma.treasury.gov.za/Media_Releases/mbi/2020/Documents/02.%20Aggregated%20municipal%202020%20MTREF%20-%2024%20Nov%202020.pdf

National Treasury.2020b. 2020 Estimates of National Expenditure. National Treasury. Accessed, 07 June 2020 http://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2020/enebooklets/Vote%2041%20Water%20and%20Sanitation.pdf

National Treasury. 2019. 2019 Estimates of National Expenditure. National Treasury. Accessed, 07 June 2020 http://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2019/enebooklets/Vote%2036%20Water%20and%20Sanitation.pdf

National Treasury. 2018. 2018 Estimates of National Expenditure. National Treasury. Accessed, 07 June 2020 http://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2018/booklets.aspx

Ngobeni and Breitenbach. 2020. Technical Efficiency of Water Boards in South Africa: A Costing and Pricing Benchmarking Exercise. Ngobeni and Breitenbach. MPRA Working Paper No.101501. Accessed, 01 January 2020 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/101501/1/MPRA_paper_101501.pdf

Overberg Water. 2019. Annual Report. 2018/19. Overberg Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 https://www.overbergwater.co.za/documents/owb_Overberg%20Water%20Annual%20Report%202018-19.pdf

Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Sáez-Fernández, F.J. and González-Gómez, F. 2007. Does Service Quality Matter in Measuring Performance of Water Utilities? Accessed, 18 June 2020 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.690.2281&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Ramírez Hassan A. 2008. Consequences of Omitting Relevant Inputs on the Quality of the Data Envelopment Analysis Under Different Input Correlation Structures. Accessed, 31 January 2019. https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10784/556/2008-1%20Andres%20Ramirez%20Hassan.pdf?sequence=1

Rand Water. 2019. 2019 Integrated Annual Report. Rand Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 https://www.randwater.co.za/Annual%20Reports/Annual%20Reports/2018-2019%20Annual%20Report%20Final/10374%20RANDWATER%20AR%20FINAL%20Electronic%202019.pdf

Sedibeng Water. 2019. Annual Report. 2018/19. Sedibeng Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 http://new.sedibengwater.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Final-Draft-SW-Annual-Report-2018-2019.pdf

Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J. 2002. Modelling undesirable factors inefficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operations Research. 142: 16–20.

Singh, M. Mittal, A.K. and Upadhyay, V. 2014. Efficient Water Utilities: Use of Performance Indicator System and Data Envelopment Analysis. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 14(5), pp.787-794.

Statistics South Africa. 2020. Financial census of municipalities for the year ended 30 June 2019. Statistics South Africa. Accessed, 02 January 2020 http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P9114/P91142019.pdf

Statistics South Africa. 2016. Community Survey 2016 Statistical Release. Statistics South Africa. Accessed, 20 July 2016. http://cs2016.statssa.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/NT-30-06-2016-RELEASE-for-CS-2016-_Statistical-releas_1-July-2016.pdf

Taylor, B. and Harris, G. 2004. Relative Efficiency among South African Universities: A Data Envelopment Analysis. Higher Education, 47(1), pp.73-89.

Umgeni Water. 2019. Annual Report. 2018/19. Umgeni Water. Accessed, 18 June 2020 https://www.umgeni.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/UW-AR-2018-2019_rev-13-compressed.pdf

United Nations. 2018. Sustainable Development Goal 6 Synthesis Report on Water and Sanitation. United Nations. Accessed, 03 January 2020 https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/docs/publications%2FSDG6_SR2018.pdf

Wang, E.C. and Alvi, E. 2011. Relative Efficiency of Government Spending and its Determinants: Evidence from East Asian Countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 1(1), pp.3-28.

Water Research Commission. 2012. The State of Non-Revenue Water in South Africa. Water Research Commission. Accessed, 03 January 2020 http://www.wrc.org.za/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/TT%20522-12.pdf

Yang, C. Hsiao, C. and Yu, M. 2008. Technical Efficiency and Impact of Environmental Regulations in Farrow-to-Finish Swine Production in Taiwan. Agricultural Economics. 39: 51–61.

Yawe, B.L. 2014. Technical efficiency and Productivity of Primary Schools in Uganda. Accessed, 31 January 2019. https://www.africaportal.org/documents/17554/RP277.pdf

You, S., and Yan, H. 2011. A New Approach in Modelling Undesirable Output in DEA model. Journal of the Operational Research Society. (62). pp. 2146-2156.

Yuan, Y. and Shan, M. 2016. The Educational Efficiency Evaluation Framework: By Using DEA Model and CA Method. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 6(12), p. 923.

Zhou, P. Ang, B.W. and Poh, K.L. 2007. A Mathematical Programming Approach to Constructing Composite Indicators. Ecology Economics 62: 291–297.