European Countries on a green path. Connections between environmental quality, renewable energy and economic growth

Abbruzzese, Matteo and Infante, Davide and Smirnova, Janna (2020): European Countries on a green path. Connections between environmental quality, renewable energy and economic growth.

Abstract

The paper investigates the environment-energy-growth relationship by exploring a panel data on 30 European economies for the period 1995-2015. We start by exploring traditional relation between environmental pollution expressed in green houses gases emissions as a whole (Kyoto Basket) as well as their three main components, carbon dioxide (CO2), dioxide of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), and per capita income extending the model by considering the role of renewable energy sources (RES). Our results, based on both fixed effects and instrumental variable methodology, demonstrate that traditional U-shape environment-growth relationship that holds for European countries is strongly influenced by the presence of RES through the shift of the turning point to higher per capita income levels. Moreover, the estimates show that with the increase of per capita consumption based on RES, environmental pollution tends to decrease in different measures, in according to the specific pollutant. As argued in the economic literature, the increase in consumption from renewable sources may generate a substitution effect, which mostly influences nuclear energy rather than fossil fuels, leading to increasing the income level of the turning point. Our results show that this increase could be due to the endogenous nature of income and to omitted variables distortion, thus revealing the true turning point. This would suggest that the process of energy transition, through the diffusion of low-emission energy sources, should accelerate to produce significant impact on pollution reduction.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental Kuznets Curve; economic growth; Kyoto basket; energy renewable sources; European Countries
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Adewuyi A. O., Awodumi O. A. (2017). Renewable and non-renewable energy-growth-emission linkages: Review of emerging trends with policy implications. Renewable and Sustainable energy Reviews, 69, 275–291. Alvarado R., Ponce P., Criollo A., Cordova K., Khan M. K. (2018). Environmental degradation and real per capita output: New evidence at the global level grouping countries by income levels. Journal of Clean Production, 189, 13-20. Alvarez-Herranz A., Balsalobre-Lorente D. (2015). Energy Regulation in the EKC model with a Dampening effect,” Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2(3), 4-10. Alvarez-Herranz A., Balsalobre-Lorente D., Shahbaz M., Cantos J. M. (2017). Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy policy, Vol. 105, 386-397. Atici C. (2009) “Carbon emissions in Central and Eastern Europe: environmental Kuznets curve and implication for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 17(3), 155-160. Balsalobre-Lorente D., Álvarez-Herranz A. (2016). Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(16), 16478–16494. Balsalobre-Lorente D., Alvarez-Herranz A. (2017). An approach to the effect of Energy Innovation on Environmental Kuznets Curve: An introduction to Inflection Point. Bulletin of Energy Economics, 4(3), 225-233. Basmann R. L. (1960). On finite sample distributions on generalized classical linear identifiability test statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association. (55), 650–659. Baum C. F. (2006), An introduction to modern econometrics using stata, Stata Press, Texas. Bilgili F., Kocak E., Bulut U. (2016). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838-845. Boluk G., Mert M. (2014). Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries. Energy, 74(1), 439-446. Borghesi S. (1999). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: a Survey of the Literature. FEEM Working Paper N. 85. Castiglione C., Infante D., Smirnova J. (2012). Rule of law and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence for carbon emissions. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 4(3), 254-269. Dogan E., Seker F. (2016). Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 94, 429-439. Dogan E., Seker F. (2016). The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1074-1085. Dutt K. (2009). Governance, institutions and the environment-income relationship: a cross-country study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(4), 705-723. European Commission (2007), European Energy Strategy 2020, Brussels. European Environment Agency (EEA), (2016), Manual for the EEA greenhouse gas data viewer, 1-11. European Environment Agency (EEA), (2016), Manual for the EEA greenhouse gas data viewer, 1-11. European Environment Agency (EEA), (2016), Air pollutant emission inventory guidebook, 1-28. Eurostat, (2017a), Climate change – driving forces, 1-30. Eurostat, (2017b), Energy production and imports, 1-11. Eurostat, (2017c), National accounts and GDP, 1-23. Eurostat, (2017d), Renewable energy statistics, 1-10. Eurostat, (2018a), Air pollution statistics- emission inventories, 1-30. Eurostat, (2018b), Greenhouse gas emission statistics- emission inventories, 1-6. Farhani S., Shahbaz M. (2014). What role of renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption and output is needed to initially mitigate CO2 emissions in MENA region?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 40, 80–90. Hoechle D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence», Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312. Hossain M. S. (2011). Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991-6999. Kasman A., Duman Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Economic Modeling, 44, 97-103. Lin, C.-Y. C., Liscow, Z. D. (2013). Endogeneity in the Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Instrumental Variables Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2), 268-274. Liobikiene G., Butkus M. (2017). Environmental Kuznets Curve of greenhouse gas emissions including technological progress and substitution effects. Energy, 135, 237-248. Lopez-Menendez A. J., Perez R., Moreno B. (2014). Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 368-373. Mandal S. K., Chakravarty D. (2018). Role of Energy in estimating turning point of Environmental Kuznets Curve: an econometric analysis of the existing studies. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 19, (2), 387-401. Ozokcu S., Ozdemir O. (2017). Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 639-647. Panayotou T. (1993). Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of The Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. WP, World Development Programmed Research: Technology and Employment Programmed, 1-45. Pesaran M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. University of Cambridge, 1-41. Santana de Souza E., Freire F. D. S., Pires J. (2018). Determinants of CO2 emissions in the MERCOSURE: the role of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy. Environment Science and Pollution Research, 25(21), 20769-20781. Sargan, J. D. (1958). The Estimation of Economic Relationships using Instrumental Variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393-415. Shafiei S., Salim R. A. (2014). Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Energy Policy, 66, 547-556. Sulaiman J., Azman A., Saboori B. (2013). The potential of renewable Energy: using the environmental Kuznets curve model. American Journal of Environment Science, 9(2), 103-112. Thombs R. P. (2017). The paradoxical relationship between renewable energy and economic growth: a cross-national panel study, 1990-2013. Journal of World-Systems Research, 23(2), 540-564. Van Ierland E. C. (1993), Macroeconomic analysis of environmental policy, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam. York R., McGee J. A. (2017). Does Renewable Energy Development Decouple Economic Growth from CO2 Emissions?. Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1-6. Zhang C., Zhao W. (2014). Panel estimation for income inequality and CO2 emissions: A regional analysis in China. Applied Energy, 136, 382-392. Zoundi Z. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1067-1075.