Asproudis, Elias and Filippiadis, Eleftherios and Tian, Mo (2021): Climate solidarity, green trade unions and timing of technological choice.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106329.pdf Download (677kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We consider a Cournot duopoly consisting of two geographically separated firms, each associated with a local environmental-friendly trade union that exhibits climate solidarity. In the basic model, firms choose abatement technologies prior to bargaining over wages and employment with the unions. We show that the trade unions would lower the wage with the degree of reciprocal solidarity, providing additional incentives for firms to adopt greener technology and hence improving the social welfare. In the alternative model where trade unions decide the wages prior to the firms’ abatement and employment decisions, the firms always choose the dirtiest available technology while output will increase with the degree of solidarity. These results suggest that establishing the social norm and practice of reciprocal solidarity across trade unions in appropriate manner will help the internalisation of global environmental issues, which could mitigate the global regulation difficulties that require strong cross-border coordination among governments.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Climate solidarity, green trade unions and timing of technological choice |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | green trade unions, reciprocity, climate solidarity, emissions, environmental technology |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics |
Item ID: | 106329 |
Depositing User: | Dr Elias Asproudis |
Date Deposited: | 01 Mar 2021 10:02 |
Last Modified: | 01 Mar 2021 10:02 |
References: | Asproudis, E. and Gil-Molto, M. (2015). Green trade unions: Structure, wages and environmental technology. Environmental and Resource Economics, 60, 165-189. Booth, A. L. (1995). The economics of the trade union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Bonanno, A. and Blome, B. (2001). The environmental movement and labor in global capitalism: Lessons from the case of the Headwaters Forest. Agriculture and Human Values, 18, 365-381. Brecher, J. (2018). Climate solidarity: Workers versus warming. New Labor Forum, 27, 96-104. Chao H-P. and Wilson, R. (1993). Option value of emission allowances. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 5, 233-249. Dewey, S. (1998). Working for the environment: Organized labor and the origins of environmentalism in the United States: 1948-1970. Environmental History, 1, 45-63. Dowrick, S. and Spencer, B. J. (1994). Union attitudes to labor-saving innovation: When are unions luddites? Journal of Labor Economics, 12, 316-344. Driffill, J. and van der Ploeg, F., (1993). Monopoly unions and the liberalisation of international trade. Economic Journal, 103, 379-385. Dufour Poirier, M. and Hennebert, M-A. (2015). The transnationalization of trade union action within multinational companies. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 36, 73-98. Espinosa, M. C. and Rhee, C. (1989). Efficient wage bargaining as a repeated game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 565-588. Felli, R. (2014). An alternative socio-ecological strategy? International trade unions’ engagement with climate change. Review of International Political Economy, 21, 372-398. Fougner, T. and Kurtoğlu, A. (2011). Transnational labour solidarity and social movement unionism: insights from and beyond a women workers’ strike in Turkey. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49, 353-375. Gajewska, K. (2009). Transnational labour solidarity: Mechanisms of commitment to cooperation within the European trade union movement. London: Routledge. Gordon, R. (1998). Shell No! OCAW and the labor-environmental alliance. Environmental History, 3, 460-488. Gordon, M. and Turner, L. (Eds.). (2000). Transnational cooperation among labor unions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University/ILR Press. Greer, I. and Hauptmeier, M. (2008). Political entrepreneurs and co-managers: Labour transnationalism at four multinational auto companies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46, 76-97. Greer, I. and Hauptmeier, M. (2012). Identity work: Sustaining transnational worker cooperation at GM Europe. Industrial Relations, 51, 275-297. Hampton, P. (2015). Workers and trade unions for climate solidarity: Tackling climate change in a neoliberal world. Routledge, London. Lopez, M. C. and Naylor, R. A. (2004). The Cournot–Bertrand profit differential: a reversal result in a differentiated duopoly with wage bargaining. European Economic Review, 48, 681-696. Mayer, B. (2009). Cross-movement coalition formation: Bridging the labor-environment Divide. Sociological Inquiry, 79, 219-239. Mukherjee, A. (2008). Unionized labour market and strategic production decision of a multinational. Economic Journal, 118, 1621-1639. Nickell, S. and Andrews, M. (1983). Unions real wages and employment in Britain 1951-1979. Oxford Economic Papers, 35, 183-206. Obach, B. K (1999). The Wisconsin labor-environmental network. Organization & Environment, 12, 45-74. Obach, B. K (2002) Labor-environment relations: An analysis of the relations between labor unionists and environmentalists. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 82-100. Obach, B. K. (2004). Labor and the environmental movement: the quest for common ground. MIT Press, Cambridge. Oswald, A. J. (1982). The microeconomic theory of the trade union. Economic Journal, 92, 576-595. Petrakis, E., and Vlassis, M. (2004). Endogenous wage-bargaining institutions in oligopolistic industries. Economic Theory, 24, 55-73. Puller, S. (2006). The strategic use of innovation to influence regulatory standards. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52, 690-706. Silverman, V. (2004). Sustainable alliances: The origins of international labor environmentalism. International Labor and Working-Class History, 66, 118–135. Silverman, V. (2006). Green unions in a grey world: Labor environmentalism and international institutions. Organization & Environment, 19, 191-213. Snell, D., and Fairbrother, P. (2010). Unions as Environmental Actors. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16, 411-424. Stevis, D. and Felli, R. (2015). Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15, 29-43. Tauman, Y. and Weiss, Y. (1987). Labor unions and the adoption of new technology. Journal of Labor Economics, 5, 477-501. Truax, H. (1992). Workers and environmental protection. Environmental Action, 24, 11-13. Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. (1988). Bargaining structures and delay in innovations. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 90, 475-491. Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. (1989). Labor markets and innovations. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 3, 403-423. Ulph, A. and D. Ulph (1994). Labor markets and innovation: Ex post bargaining. European Economic Review, 38, 195-210. Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. (1998). Labour markets, bargaining, and innovation. European Economic Review, 42, 931-939. Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. (2001). Strategic innovation with complete and incomplete labour market contracts. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103, 265-282. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106329 |