Government R&D Subsidies and International Competitiveness of Labor-managed Firms

Ho, Jerry and Hoang, Vincent and Wilson, Clevo (2020): Government R&D Subsidies and International Competitiveness of Labor-managed Firms. Published in: Heliyon , Vol. 7, No. 2 (18 January 2021): pp. 1-8.

Abstract

The literature postulates that government subsidization of strategic R&D activities of profit maximising firms (PMFs) increases their shares in international markets. Will this also hold for labor-managed firms (LMFs) which are owned by employees and aim to maximize the profit per labor? This paper provides a theoretical model that examines how such governmental interventions can help LMFs in their home countries to compete better with PMFs in international markets. Our model shows that in most, but not all cases, investing more in R&D activities benefits LMFs by increasing their shares in international markets and decreasing the market share of their competitors. The optimal government R&D subsidy or tax for LMFs depends on the R&D elasticity of LMFs as well as how their competitors react to R&D investment. In contrast, the optimal government R&D subsidy for PMFs depends solely on the slope of the R&D reaction curve of PMFs competitors. Our results present useful policy implications for those governments that seek ways to support LMFs - or more broadly cooperatives - to attain more sustained growth given their advantages over PMFs in the context of sustainable development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: duopoly; cooperatives; labor-managed firms; profit-maximizing firm; R&D subsidy
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade

References

Ball, J., Reicher, D., Sun, X., Pollock, C., 2017. The new solar system: China’s evolving solar industry and its implications for competitive solar power in the United States and the world. Stanford Univ., CA (United States)

Bloom, N., Jones, C.I., Van Reenen, J., Webb, M., 2020. Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? American Economic Review 110, 1104-44

Boeing, P., Hünermund, P., 2020. A global decline in research productivity? Evidence from China and Germany. Economics Letters, 109646

Brander, J.A., Spencer, B.J., 1983. Strategic Commitment with R&D: The Symmetric Case. The Bell Journal of Economics 14, 225-235

Chen, H.H., Lee, A.H.I., Chen, J., 2016. The relationship between innovation and performance in special nonprofit firms: Social and cooperative agrifood firms. Journal of Management & Organization 23, 587-602

Dixit, A., 1980. The Role of Investment in Entry-Deterrence. The Economic Journal 90, 95-106 EURICSE, COOP, 2020. Word Cooperative Monitor Exploring the Cooperative Economy Report 2019. Monitor Coop

Gang, C., 2015. China's Solar PV manufacturing and subsidies from the perspective of state capitalism. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 33, 90-106

Gecchelin, T., Webb, J., 2019. Modular dynamic ride-sharing transport systems, Economic Analysis and Policy, 61,111-117.

Groot, L., van Der Linde, D., 2017. The Labor-Managed Firm: Permanent or Start-Up Subsidies? Journal of Economic Issues 51, 1074-1093

Lambertini, L., Rossini, G., 1998. Capital Commitment and Cournot Competition with Labour managed and Profit-maximising Firms. Australian Economic Papers 37, 14-21

Luo, J., 2013. Absorptive capacity and R&D strategy in mixed duopoly with labor-managed and profit maximizing firms. Economic Modelling 31, 433-439

Mai, C.-C., Hwang, H., 1989. Export subsidies and oligopolistic rivalry between labor-managed and capitalist economies. Journal of Comparative Economics 13, 473-480

Mikami, K., 2018. Are cooperative firms a less competitive form of business? Production efficiency and financial viability of cooperative firms with tradable membership shares. Economic Systems 42, 487-502

Monteiro, N.P., Stewart, G., 2015. Scale, Scope and Survival: A Comparison of Cooperative and Capitalist Modes of Production. Review of Industrial Organization 47, 91-118