Aslan, Alper and Destek, Mehmet Akif and Okumus, İlyas (2017): Sectoral carbon emissions and economic growth in the US: Further evidence from rolling window estimation method. Published in: Journal of Cleaner Production , Vol. 200, (31 July 2018): pp. 402-411.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106961.pdf Download (288kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis (EKC) which argues that an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between economic growth and environmental degradation has been examined by numerous studies for different countries or country groups. However, the validity of the EKC hypothesis at the sectoral level is mostly ignored. In addition, most of these studies have modeled the nexus between per capita income and CO2 emissions based on the assumption of non-linearity. Unlike previous studies, the main purpose of this paper is to investigate the validity of EKC hypothesis for sub-elements of carbon dioxide emissions (i.e. total CO2 emission, commercial CO2 emission, electrical CO2 emission, industrial CO2 emission, residential CO2 emission and transportation CO2 emission) in the United States for the annual data of 1973-2015. In doing so, the rolling window estimation procedure is employed to observe the effect of per capita income on sectoral CO2 emission for each sub-sample period instead of the non-linear assumption. The results of the rolling window coefficients show that inverted U-shaped EKC hypothesis is valid for total CO2 emission, industrial CO2 emission, electrical CO2 emission and residential CO2 emission. However, the inverted U-shaped relationship between economic growth and CO2 emission is not supported for commercial and transport sector of the US.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Sectoral carbon emissions and economic growth in the US: Further evidence from rolling window estimation method |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Sectoral CO2 emission; economic growth; EKC hypothesis; rolling window estimation |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects |
Item ID: | 106961 |
Depositing User: | Mehmet Akif Destek |
Date Deposited: | 03 Apr 2021 07:43 |
Last Modified: | 03 Apr 2021 07:43 |
References: | Ahmad, N., Du, L., Lu, J., Wang, J., Li, H. Z., & Hashmi, M. Z. (2017). Modelling the CO 2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: Is there any environmental Kuznets curve? Energy, 123, 164-172. Ahmed, K., & Long, W. (2012). Environmental Kuznets curve and Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1, 4-13. Akbostancı, E., Türüt-Aşık, S., & Tunç, G. I. (2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve?. Energy Policy, 37(3), 861-867. Al-Mulali, U., & Ozturk, I. (2016). The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: The role of energy prices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1622-1631. Al-Mulali, U., Saboori, B., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy, 76, 123-131. Al-Mulali, U., Solarin, S. A., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Natural Hazards, 80(3), 1729-1747. Alper, A., & Onur, G. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for sub-elements of the carbon emissions in China. Natural Hazards, 82(2), 1327-1340. Andrews, D.W.K., (1993). Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61, 821–856. Andrews, D.W.K., Ploberger, W., (1994). Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62, 1383–1414 Apergis, N., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16-22. Arouri, M., Shahbaz, M., Onchang, R., Islam, F., & Teulon, F. (2014). Environmental Kuznets curve in Thailand: cointegration and causality analysis. J Energy Dev, 39, 149-170. Atasoy, B. S. (2017). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across the US: Evidence from panel mean group estimators. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 731-747. Balaguer, J., & Cantavella, M. (2016). Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for Spain by considering fuel oil prices (1874–2011). Ecological Indicators, 60, 853-859. Balcilar, M., Ozdemir, Z. A., Arslanturk, Y., (2010). Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1398-1410. Begum, R. A., Sohag, K., Abdullah, S. M. S., & Jaafar, M. (2015). CO 2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 594-601. Boluk, G., & Mert, M. (2015). The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587-595. Bowden, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Sectoral analysis of the causal relationship between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real output in the US. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 5(4), 400-408. Brajer, V., Mead, R. W., & Xiao, F. (2011). Searching for an Environmental Kuznets Curve in China's air pollution. China Economic Review, 22(3), 383-397. Chandran, V. G. R., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 445-453. Cho, C. H., Chu, Y. P., & Yang, H. Y. (2014). An environment Kuznets curve for GHG emissions: a panel cointegration analysis. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(2), 120-129. Chow, G. C., & Li, J. (2014). Environmental Kuznets curve: conclusive econometric evidence for CO2. Pacific Economic Review, 19(1), 1-7. Congregado, E., Feria-Gallardo, J., Golpe, A. A., & Iglesias, J. (2016). The environmental Kuznets curve and CO2 emissions in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(18), 18407-18420. Dogan, E., & Turkekul, B. (2016). CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2), 1203-1213. EIA (2016).U.S. Energy Information Administration database. EIA (2017). US. Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2017. Efron, B., (1979). Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7,1–26. Esteve, V., & Tamarit, C. (2012). Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment between CO 2 and income: the environmental Kuznets curve in Spain, 1857–2007. Energy Economics, 34(6), 2148-2156. Farhani, S., Chaibi, A., & Rault, C. (2014b). CO 2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Economic Modelling, 38, 426-434. Farhani, S., Mrizak, S., Chaibi, A., & Rault, C. (2014a). The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainability: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 71, 189-198. Fodha, M., & Zaghdoud, O. (2010). Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 38(2), 1150-1156. Fosten, J., Morley, B., & Taylor, T. (2012). Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from CO 2 and SO 2 emissions in the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 76, 25-33. Gozgor, G., & Can, M. (2016). Export product diversification and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(21), 21594-21603. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. Hacker, R.S., Hatemi-J, A., (2006). Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: theory and application. Applied Economics 38, 1489–1500. Hamit-Haggar, M. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Economics, 34(1), 358-364. Hansen, B.E., (1992). Tests for parameter instability in regressions with I(1) processes. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10, 321–336. Hao, Y., Liu, Y., Weng, J. H., & Gao, Y. (2016). Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve for coal consumption in China exist? New evidence from spatial econometric analysis. Energy, 114, 1214-1223. He, J., & Richard, P. (2010). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO 2 in Canada. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 1083-1093. IPCC (2014). Intergovernmental panel on climate change 2014 report. Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2010). Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO 2 in France: the role of nuclear energy. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4057-4063. Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO 2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167-5172. Javid, M., & Sharif, F. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 406-414. Jebli, M. B., & Youssef, S. B. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 173-185. Khan, S. A. R., Zaman, K., & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between energy-resource depletion, climate change, health resources and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from the panel of selected developed countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 468-477. Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., & Eng, Y. K. (2014). Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: Do foreign direct investment and trade matter?. Energy Policy, 68, 490-497. Li, T., Wang, Y., & Zhao, D. (2016). Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: New evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy, 91, 138-147. Muhammad, S., Lean, H. H., & Muhammad, S. S. (2011). Environmental Kuznets curve and the role of energy consumption in Pakistan. Nasir, M., & Rehman, F. U. (2011). Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1857-1864. Ozturk, I., & Al-Mulali, U. (2015). Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecological Indicators, 57, 324-330. Ozokcu, S., & Ozdemir, O. (2017). Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 639-647. Pablo-Romero, M. D. P., & Sánchez-Braza, A. (2017). Residential Energy Environmental Kuznets Curve in the EU-28. Energy. Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (No. 992927783402676). International Labour Organization. Pesaran, M. H., & Timmermann, A. (2005). Small sample properties of forecasts from autoregressive models under structural breaks. Journal of Econometrics, 129(1), 183-217. Rafindadi, A. A. (2016). Revisiting the concept of environmental Kuznets curve in period of energy disaster and deteriorating income: Empirical evidence from Japan. Energy Policy, 94, 274-284. Saboori, B., & Sulaiman, J. (2013). Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: Evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy, 60, 892-905. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J. B., & Mohd, S. (2012b). An empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in Indonesia: the role of energy consumption and foreign trade. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(2), 243. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2012a). Economic growth and CO 2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 51, 184-191. Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence (Vol. 904). World Bank Publications. Shahbaz, M., Dube, S., Ozturk, I., & Jalil, A. (2015). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Portugal. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(2). Shahbaz, M., Khraief, N., Uddin, G. S., & Ozturk, I. (2014a). Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 325-336. Shahbaz, M., Lean, H. H., & Shabbir, M. S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2947-2953. Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M., & Azim, P. (2013a). Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 165-173. Shahbaz, M., Ozturk, I., Afza, T., & Ali, A. (2013b). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 494-502. Shahbaz, M., Sbia, R., Hamdi, H., & Ozturk, I. (2014b). Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecological Indicators, 45, 622-631. Tiwari, A. K., Shahbaz, M., & Hye, Q. M. A. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 519-527. Wang, A., & Lin, B. (2017). Assessing CO2 emissions in China’s commercial sector: Determinants and reduction strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1542-1552. Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Lu, A., Li, L., He, Y., ToJo, J., & Zhu, X. (2017). A disaggregated analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for industrial CO 2 emissions in China. Applied Energy, 190, 172-180. Xu, B., & Lin, B. (2015). Factors affecting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China's transport sector: a dynamic nonparametric additive regression model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 311-322. Yavuz, N. Ç. (2014). CO2 emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for turkey: evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(3), 229-235. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106961 |