Estimating Legislative Effectiveness in Nigeria

Ekor, Maxwell and Katz, Menachem and Iweala, Ola (2014): Estimating Legislative Effectiveness in Nigeria. Published in: Developing Country Studies , Vol. Vol. 4, No. No. 3 (2014): pp. 69-77.

Abstract

The study estimates the effectiveness of legislators in Nigeria using the Legislative Effectiveness Score (LES) approach proposed by Volden and Wiseman. The study deviates from the often controversial issue of astronomical remuneration of the legislators’- to assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the individual legislators. The findings show that on average, legislators with experience sponsored approximately 2.58 bills per head in the reviewed period, while those without legislative experience sponsored approximately 2.32 bills per head. This supports the views in the literature that longer serving members of the legislature tend to be more effective. Also, the LES ranking showed that out of the top 10 senators, eight were of the ruling Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) while two were of the now defunct All Nigeria’s Peoples Party. This also supports the unanimous findings in the literature that members of the dominant party tend to be more successful than members of the minority or opposition parties. With respect to individual senators effectiveness, Senator Victor Ndoma Egba, with legislative experience, and of the ruling PDP, was the most effective senator in the period reviewed.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Legislature, Legislative Effectiveness, Bill, Score
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H59 - Other; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H61 - Budget ; Budget Systems

References

Adler, E., Feeley, T., & Wilkerson, J. (2003), ‘Bill Sponsorship Activity and Success in Congress: Why we should Change How We Study Legislative Effectiveness’, Presented at the annual meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association.

Adler, E., Berry, M., Cherie, M., & Wilkerson, J. (2005), ‘The Politics of Legislative Specialization: Issues and Considerations in Measurement, 96TH-105TH Congresses’, Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

Adler, E., & Wilkerson, J. (2005), ‘The Scope and Urgency of Legislation: Reconsidering Bill Success in the House of Representatives’, Prepared for delivery at the 2005 annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, September 1-4, Washington D.C.

Anderson, W., Box-Steffensmeier, J., & Chapman, V. (2003), ‘The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(3): 357-86.

Cox, G., & McCubbins M. (1993), Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gast, J. (2006), ‘Informational Theory and Chamber Dominance of Congressional Power’, http://largo.crushhumanity.org/doc/informationtheory.pdf. Cited April 10th 2012

Hall, R. (1987), ‘Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision-Making’, American Political Science Review 81(1): 105-128.

Hall, R. (1992), ‘Measuring Legislative Influence’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(2): 205-231 Hall, R. (1996), Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hamm, K., Harmel, R., & Robert T. (1983), ‘Ethnic and Partisan Minorities in Two Southern State Legislatures’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 177-189

Helliwel, J. F. (1992), ‘Empirical Linkages between Democracy and Growth’, NBER Working Paper Series 4066

Krutz, G. (2005), ‘Issues and Institutions: Winnowing in the U.S. Congress’, American Journal of Political Science 49: 313-26.

Matthews, D. (1959), ‘The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness’, American Political Science Review. 53:1064-89.

Nigerian National Assembly Statistical Information, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2008

Nigerian National Assembly Statistical Information, Vol. 3, 2009

Prince, W., & Overby, L. (2005), ‘Legislative Organization Theory and Committee Preference Outliers in State Senates’, State Politics and Policy Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.68-87

Rodriguez, D. & Weingast, B. (2006), ‘The Positive Political Theory of Legislative History: New Perspectives on the 1964 Civil Rights Act and its Interpretation’, http://igs.berkeley.edu/programs/seminars/ppt/papers/drodriguez.pdf. Cited April 5th 2012

Roll, R. & Talbott, J. (2003), ‘Political Freedom, Economic Liberty and Prosperity’, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.1-21

Volden, C. & Wiseman, A. (2008), ‘Measuring Legislative Effectiveness in Congress’ http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/programs/beyond/workshops/pol_econ_papers/fall08-wiseman.pdf.Cited 3rd April, 2012

Wawro, G. (2000), Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Wilson, R. & Young, C. (1997), ‘Co-sponsorship in the US Congress’, Legislative Studies Quarterly

Zwingina, J. (2006), ‘The Role of the Legislature in Democratic Governance: The Nigerian Experience’ Nigerian Journal of Legislative Affairs, Vol. 1 No. 001, pp 285-301