Hasan, Zubair (2020): Islamic economics: morality, rationality, and research. Published in: KAUJ: Islamic Economics , Vol. 34, No. 2 (1 July 2021): pp. 3-13.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_108326.pdf Download (633kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The lead paper of Asad Zaman (2021) – Islamic alternatives to the secular morality embedded in modern economics– under review, is lucid and well documented; it speaks of his scholarship. The author talks of secular moral values ingrained in secular economics. Among them, the learned author focuses on ‘pleasure and profit’ as the goals of modern economics and scarcity buried in its foundations. He regards these two as definitional for secular rationality leading to positivism and what it implies. Since this view, in his opinion, is devoid of human traits like compassion, equity, and altruism, he proposes an Islamic alternative as a replacement. While some observations of the author in this regard are well-meaning and well taken, we shall evaluate the author’s critique of mainstream positions to see if they need rejection or reform for compatibility with Islamic norms. We shall argue that reform is a better alternative than refusal.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Islamic economics: morality, rationality, and research |
English Title: | Islamic economics: morality, rationality, and research |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Morality, Rational behavior, Positivism, Islamic norms, Research issues. |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology |
Item ID: | 108326 |
Depositing User: | Zubair Hasan |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2021 07:48 |
Last Modified: | 18 Jun 2021 07:48 |
References: | Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics: Or how economists explain (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Browne, K.E., & Milgram, B.L. (Eds.). (2009). Economics and morality: Anthropological approaches. AltaMira Press . Choudhury, M.A. (2009), Islamic critique and alternative to financial engineering issues”, J.KAU: Islamic Econ., Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 205-244. Grudniewicz, A (2019): Predatory journals: no definition, no defense – Nature, https://www.nature.com › comment › article Hasan, Z. (1998).Islamization of knowledge in economics: Issues and agenda. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management,6(2), 1-40. https://bit.ly/3psM0A5 ----------- (2015): Risk-sharing versus risk-transfer in Islamic finance: An evaluation. Working paper, MPRA Islahi, A.A. (2010). Four generations of Islamic economists. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 23(1),65-170. Jeddah Kizilkaya, N. (Ed.). (2020). Methodology of Islamic economics: Problems and solutions. Routledge. Mirakhor, A et al (2012): Risk Sharing in Finance: The Islamic Finance Alternative, Wiley Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics: An introductory volume (8th ed.). MacMillan and Co. Neurath, O., Carnap, R., & Hahn, H. (1973). ssenschaftlicheweltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis [The scientific conception of the world: The Vienna Circle]. In: M. Neurath& R.S. Cohen (Eds.), Empiricism and Sociology (pp. 298-318). Springer. https://doi.org/fcfr6d (Original work published 1929) Robbins, L. (1932).An essay on the nature and significance of economic science.Macmillan. Smith, A.(1776).An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell. Zaman, A. (2020): The methodology of third generation economics, in Necmittin, K. Editor, Methodology of Islamic economics, problems and solutions, Routledge, New York -------------- (2021). Islamic alternatives to the secular morality embedded in modern economics. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 34(2),pp. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/108326 |