Paccagnini, Alessia (2021): Teaching Quantitative Courses Online: An International Survey.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_108330.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
COVID-19 crisis is changing our lifestyle and also how to teach at any educational level. Online delivery has become predominant. Educators have started to use new tools and methods to engage students who had to change their learning approach. An international survey with responses from 151 university teachers, primarily based in Europe, North America, and South America, teaching quantitative courses in degrees in Economics and related fields documents how the teaching strategies have been modified due to this pandemic event. As the main findings, online teaching has the advantage to give more flexibility and new educational tools. The disadvantages include the perception that teachers and students are increasing their workload and reducing their interactions. The main takeaway is how new technological tools and the flexibility of online teaching will have an important impact on future courses and module design.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Teaching Quantitative Courses Online: An International Survey |
English Title: | Teaching Quantitative Courses Online: An International Survey |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Quantitative Courses, Online Teaching, Survey, and COVID-19 |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General |
Item ID: | 108330 |
Depositing User: | Dr Alessia Paccagnini |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2021 07:51 |
Last Modified: | 18 Jun 2021 07:51 |
References: | Allen, Mike, Edward Mabry, Michelle Mattrey, John Bourhis, Scott Titsworth, and Nancy Burrell (2004) ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis.’ Journal of Communication 54(3), 402–420. Anstine, Jeff, and Mark Skidmore (2005) ‘A small sample study of traditional and online courses with sample selection adjustment.’ The Journal of Economic Education 36(2), 107–127. Baker, Anne (2003) ‘Faculty development for teaching online: educational and technological issues.’ The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 34, 273–278. Black, Genie (2002) ‘A comparison of traditional, online, and hybrid methods of course delivery.’ Journal of Business Administration Online 1, 1–9. Bok, Derek (2004) ‘Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education.’ Princeton University Press. Bowman, J.P. (2003) ‘It’s not easy being green: Evaluating student performance in online business communication courses.’ Business Communication Quarterly 66 (1), 73–78. Britain, Sandy, and Oleg Liber (2004) ‘A framework for pedagogical evaluation of virtual learning environments.’ ffhal-00696234f. Brooks, J. Michael (1997) ‘Beyond teaching and learning paradigms: Trekking into the virtual university.’ Teaching Sociology 25(1), 1–14. Bryant, Jill, and Alisa J. Bates (2015) ‘Creating a constructivist online instructional environment.’ TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 59(4), 17–22. Calafiore, Pablo, and Damian S. Damianov (2011) ‘The effect of time spent online on stu- dent achievement in online economics and finance courses.’ The Journal of Economic Education 42(3), 209–223. Clark-Ib´an˜ez, Marisol, and Linda Scott (2008) ‘Learning to teach online.’ Teaching Sociology 36(1), 34–41. Clark, Ruth C., and Richard E. Mayer (2016) ‘e-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning.’ John Wiley & Sons. Coates, Dennis, Brad R. Humphreys, John Kane, and Michelle A. Vachris (2004) ‘“No significant distance” between face-to-face and online instruction: evidence from principles of economics.’ Economics of Education Review 23(5), 533–546. Cox, Betty, and Becky Cox (2008) ‘Developing interpersonal and group dynamics through asynchronous threaded discussions: The use of discussion board in collaborative learning.’ Education 128(4), 553–565. Dabbagh, Nada, and Brenda Bannan-Ritland (2005) ‘Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and applications.’ Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River. Driscoll, Adam, Karl Jicha, Tichavsky Lisa Hunt, Andrea N., and Gretchen Thompson (2012) ‘Can online courses deliver in-class results? a comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course.’ Teaching Sociology 40, 312–331. Farinella, Joseph (2007) ‘Professor and student performance in online versus traditional intro- ductory finance courses.’ JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE EDUCATION 6(1), 40–47. Gagne, Robert M., Walter W Wager, Katharine C. Golas, and Russell James D. Keller, John M. (2005) ‘Principles of instructional design.’ Performance Improvement 44, 44–46. Gallagher, Peggy A., and Katherine McCormick (1999) ‘Student satisfaction with two-way interactive distance learning for delivery of early childhood special education coursework.’ Journal of Special Education Technology 14, 32–47. Harmon, Oskar R., and James Lambrinos (2008) ‘Are online exams an invitation to cheat?’ The Journal of Economic Education 39(2), 116–125. Ilgaz, Hale, and Gu¨lgu¨n Afacan Adanir (2020) ‘Providing online exams for online learners: Does it really matter for them?’ Education and Information Technologies 25, 1255–1269. Jaffee, David (1997) ‘Asynchronous learning: Technology and pedagogical strategy in a distance learning course.’ Teaching Sociology 25(4), 262–277. Keengwe, Jared, and Terry T. Kidd (2010) ‘Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education.’ MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Lauzon, Allan C., and George A. B. Moore (1989) ‘Computer: A fourth generation distance education system: Integrating computer-assisted learning and computer conferencing.’ American Journal of Distance Education. Lee, Sang Joon, Sandhya Srinivasan, Trudian Trail, David Lewis, and Samantha Lopez (2011) ‘Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning.’ The Internet and Higher Education 14, 158–163. Logan, Elisabeth, Rebecca H. Augustyniak, and Alison Rees (2002) ‘Distance education as different education: A student-centered investigation of distance learning experience : Distance education.’ Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 43, 32–42. Marasi, Shelly, Brian Jones, and Janna M. Parker (2020) ‘Faculty satisfaction with online teaching: a comprehensive study with american faculty.’ Studies in Higher Education 0(0), 1–13. McFarland, Daniel, and Diane Hamilton (2005) ‘Factors affecting student performance and satisfaction: Online versus traditional course delivery.’ Journal of Computer Information Systems 46(2), 25–32. Naidu, Som (2021) ‘Building resilience in education systems post-covid-19.’ Distance Education 42(1), 1–4. Nipper, S. (1989) ‘Third generation distance learning and computer conferencing.’ in Mason, R. and Kaye, A. Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education Oxford: Pergamon. Parkhust, Rosamond, Barbara M. Moskal, Gary L. Downey, Juan Lucena, Thomas Bigley, and Sharon Elberb (2008) ‘Engineering cultures: Online versus in-class.’ MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 4, 438–445. Parsad, Basmat, Laurie Lewis, and Peter Tice (2008) ‘Distance education at degree-granting post- secondary institutions: 2006-2007.’ National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009044.pdf. Rivera-Mata, Juan (2020) ‘How to teach online? recommendations for the assessment of online exams with university students in the usa in times of pandemic.’ International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation 15, 188–202. Rovai, Alfred P., and Kirk T. Barnum (2003) ‘On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning.’ International Journal of E-Learning Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation `a distance 18, 57–73. Snart, Jason A. (2010) ‘Hybrid learning: The perils and promise of blending online and face- toface instruction in higher education: The perils and promise of blending online and face-to-face instruction in higher education.’ ABC-CLIO. Summers, Jessica J., Alexander Waigandt, and Tiffany A. Whittaker (2005) ‘A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class.’ Innovative Higher Education 29, 233–250. Sumner, Jennifer (2000) ‘Serving the system: A critical history of distance education.’ Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 15(3), 267–285. Sun, Anna, and Xiufang Chen (2016) ‘Online education and its effective practice: A research review.’ Journal of Information Technology Education. Tucker, Sheila (2001) ‘Distance education: Better, worse, or as good as traditional education.’ Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Urdan, Trace A., and Cornelia C. Weggen (2000) ‘Corporate elearning: Exploring a new frontier.’ http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/2c7d.content.pdf. World Health Organization, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (2020) ‘Who director- general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on covid-19 - 11 march 2020.’ https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening- remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020. Worley, Rebecca B., and Marilyn A. Dyrud (2003) ‘In this issue: grading and assessment of student writing.(focus on teaching).’ Business Communication Quarterly 66, 72–97. Yang, Linda (2021) ‘Online learning experiences of irish university students during the covid-19 pandemic.’ All Ireland Journal of Higher Education: COVID-19 Special Issue: Part 2 13, 1–22. York, Reginald O. (2008) ‘Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program.’ Journal of Social Work Education 44(2), 157–172. Yuan, J., and C. Kim (2014) ‘Guidelines for facilitating the development of learning communities in online courses.’ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 30(3), 220–232. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/108330 |