Emission tax and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a Cournot–Bertrand comparison

Xu, Lili and Chen, Yuyan and Lee, Sang-Ho (2021): Emission tax and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a Cournot–Bertrand comparison.

Abstract

This study considers strategic relations between emission tax and environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) in a Cournot–Bertrand comparison, and analyzes two different timings of the games between a tax-then-ECSR (T game) and an ECSR-then-tax (E game). We show that the T game always yields higher emission tax than the E game irrespective of competition modes, but lower ECSR under Cournot while higher ECSR when the marginal damage is high under Bertrand. Additionally, compared with Bertrand, Cournot yields lower (higher) ECSR in the T (E) game, but lower emission tax in the E game while higher emission tax when the product substitutability is low in the T game. We finally show that firms always prefer Cournot competition with the commitment of E game irrespective of the product substitutability and marginal damage.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Emission tax; environmental corporate social responsibility; Cournot–Bertrand comparison; tax-then-ECSR; ECSR-then-tax
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M14 - Corporate Culture ; Diversity ; Social Responsibility

References

Bénabou, R., and J. Tirole. 2010. Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility. Economica 77: 1-19.

Buccella, D., L. Fanti, and L. Gori. 2021. To Abate, or Not to Abate? A Strategic Approach on Green Production in Cournot and Bertrand Duopolies. Energy Economics 96: 105164.

Crifo, P., and V. D. Forget. 2015. The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Firm-Level Perspective Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 29(1): 112-130.

Dixit, A. K. 1979. A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers. Bell Journal of Economics. 10(1): 20-32.

Fukuda, K., and Y. Ouchida. 2020. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the Environment: Does CSR Increase Emissions? Energy Economics 92: 104933.

García, A., M. Leal, and S. Lee. 2018. Time-Inconsistent Environmental Policies with a Consumer-Friendly Firm: Tradable Permits Versus Emission Tax. International Review of Economics & Finance 58: 523-537.

Ghosh, A., and M. Mitra. 2010. Comparing Bertrand and Cournot in Mixed Markets. Economics Letters 109(2): 72-74. Haraguchi, J., and T. Matsumura. 2014. Price Versus Quantity in a Mixed Duopoly with Foreign Penetration. Research in Economics 68(4): 338-353.

Haraguchi, J., and T. Matsumura. 2015. Cournot-Bertrand Comparison in a Mixed Oligopoly. Journal of Economics 117(2): 117-136.

Hirose, K., S. Lee, and T. Matsumura. 2017. Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility: A Note on the First-mover Advantage Under Price Competition. Economics Bulletin, 37(1): 214-221.

Hirose, K., S. Lee, and T. Matsumura. 2020. Noncooperative and Cooperative Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 176(3): 549-571.

Khojastehpour, M., and R. Johns. 2014. The Effect of Environmental CSR Issues on Corporate/Brand Reputation and Corporate Profitability. European Business Review 26(4): 330-339.

Kim, J., and S. Lee. 1995. An Optimal Regulation in an Intertemporal Oligopoly Market: The Generalized Incremental Surplus Subsidy (GISS) Scheme. Information Economics and Policy 7(3): 225-249.

Kitzmueller, M., and J. Shimshack. 2012. Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature 50(1): 51-84.

KPMG, 2017. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. URL. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf.

Leal, M., A. García, and S. Lee. 2018. The Timing of Environmental Tax Policy with a Consumer-Friendly Firm. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 59(1): 25-43.

Lee, S. 1999. Optimal Taxation for Polluting Oligopolists with Endogenous Market Structure. Journal of Regulatory Economics 15(3): 293-308

Lee, S., and C. Park. 2019. Eco-firms and the Sequential Adoption of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility in the Managerial Delegation. Journal of Theoretical Economics. 19(1): 20170043.

Lee, S., T. Matsumura, and S. Sato. 2018. An Analysis of Entry-Then-Privatization Model: Welfare and Policy Implications. Journal of Economics 123(1): 71-88.

Lian, X., Q. Gong, and L. F. S. Wang. 2018. Consumer Awareness and Ex-Ante Versus Ex-Post Environmental Policies Revisited. International Review of Economics & Finance 55: 68-77.

Matsumura, T., and Ogawa, A. 2012. Price Versus Quantity in a Mixed Duopoly. Economics Letters 116(2): 174-177.

Nakamura, Y. 2015. Price Versus Quantity in a Mixed Duopoly: The Case of Relative Profit Maximization. Economic Modelling 44: 37-43.

Ohori, S. 2006. Optimal Environmental Tax and Level of Privatization in an International Duopoly. Journal of Regulatory Economics 29(2): 225-233.

Pal, R., and Saha, B. 2014. Mixed Duopoly and Environment. Journal of Public Economic Theory 16(1): 96-118.

Pal, R., and Saha, B. 2015. Pollution Tax, Partial Privatization and Environment. Resource and Energy Economics. 40: 19-35.

Poyago-Theotoky, J., and K. Teerasuwannajak. 2002. The Timing of Environmental Policy: A Note on the Role of Product Differentiation. Journal of Regulatory Economics 21(3): 305-316.

Schreck, P. 2011. Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 103: 167-188.

Scrimitore, M. 2014. Profitability Under Commitment in Cournot and Bertrand Mixed Markets. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 170(4): 684-703.

Shaffer, S. 1995. Optimal Linear Taxation of Polluting Oligopolists. Journal of Regulatory Economics 7: 85-100.

Singh, N., and Vives, X. 1984. Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly. Rand Journal of Economics 15(4): 546-554.

Sprinkle, G. B., and L. A. Maines. 2010. The Benefits and Costs of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Horizons 53(5): 445-453.

Wang, C. 2021. Monopoly with Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation, and Environmental R&D: Implications for Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 287: 125433.

Xu, L., and S. Lee. 2018. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Taxation with Endogenous Entry. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 59(2): 61-82.

Xu, L., S. Cho, and S. Lee. 2016. Emission Tax and Optimal Privatization in Cournot-Bertrand Comparison. Economic Modelling 55: 73-82.

Xu, L., S. Lee, and T. Matsumura. 2017. Ex-Ante Versus Ex-Post Privatization Policies with Foreign Penetration in Free-Entry Mixed Markets. International Review of Economics & Finance 50: 1-7.