Taking risks by flying paper airplanes

Alfonso-Costillo, Antonio (2021): Taking risks by flying paper airplanes.

Abstract

We report the results of an outdoor activity conducted in game theory courses where students were invited to throw airplanes in order to win a prize. They flew self-made paper airplanes to earn points in three trials. The main purpose of these outdoor classroom experiments was to incentive students to learn by experiencing concepts of uncertainty in the gain domain (risk aversion). After throwing the airplanes, the students thought about decisions under uncertainty. Specifically, we provide a theoretical model to explain the subjects’ decisions, optimal behavior, and deviations from that behavior. Overall, our activity creates a setting to foster students’ interest in the study of decision making under uncertainty.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Classroom experiments, flipped classroom, expected utility theory, risk taking
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C99 - Other

References

Amador-Hidalgo, L., Brañas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., García-Muñoz, T., and Hernández-Román, A. 2021. Cognitive abilities and risk-taking: Errors, not preferences. European Economic Review 134: 103694. Brañas-Garza, P., Estepa Mohedano, L., Jorrat, D., Orozco, V., and Rascon-Ramirez, E. 2020. To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and field. Munich Repository: 103088. Bénabou, R., and Tirole, J. 2006. Incentives and prosocial behavior. The American Economic Review 96 (5): 1652-1678. Campbell-Meiklejohn, D., Simonsen, A., Scheel-Krüger, J., Wohlert, V., Gjerløff, T., Frith, C. D., Rogers, R. D., Roepstroff, A., and Møller, A. 2012. In for a penny, in for a pound: methylphenidate reduces the inhibitory effect of high stakes on persistent risky choice. Journal of Neuroscience 32 (38): 13032-13038. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., and Imas, A. 2013. Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 87: 43-51. Cox, J. C., Sadiraj, V., and Schmidt, U. 2015. Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk. Experimental Economics 18 (2): 215-250. Crosetto, P., and Filippin, A. 2013. The “bomb” risk elicitation task. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 47 (1): 31-65. Davis, J. 2019. Teaching strategies for the college classroom. London: Routledge. Delavande, A., Giné, X., and McKenzie, D. 2011. Measuring subjective expectations in developing countries: A critical review and new evidence. Journal of Development Economics 94 (2): 151-163. Eckel, C., Grossman, P. J., and Milano, A. 2007. Is more information always better? An experimental study of charitable giving and Hurricane Katrina. Southern Economic Journal 74 (2): 388-411. Ewing, B. T., Kruse, J. B., and Thompson, M. A. 2010. Measuring the regional economic response to Hurricane Katrina. CESifo Forum 11 (2): 80-85. Filippin, A., and Crosetto, P. 2016. A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Management Science 62 (11): 3138-3160. Frey, R., Richter, D., Schupp, J., Hertwig, R., and Mata, R. 2021. Identifying robust correlates of risk preference: A systematic approach using specification curve analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 120 (2): 538. Heimer, R., Iliewa, Z., Imas, A., and Weber, M. 2021. Dynamic inconsistency in risky choice: Evidence from the lab and field. SSRN: 3600583. Holt, C. A., and Laury, S. K. 2002. Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644-1655. Johnson, P., and Staveley-O’Carroll, J. 2020. An exchange rate risk experiment with multiple currencies. The Journal of Economic Education 51 (1): 19-30. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. 1979. On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition 7 (4): 409-411. Korneychuk, B., and Bylieva, D. 2018. The use of business games in Russian higher education: Prerequisites and obstacles. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS 51: 13-22. Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., and Brown, R. A. 2002. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8 (2): 75-84. Mkondiwa, M. 2020. Games of strategy in culture and economics research. Journal of Economic Methodology 27 (2): 146-163. Ng, C. F. 2019. A video game to supplement a hybrid principles of microeconomics course. The Journal of Economic Education 50 (1): 44-56. Pedroni, A., Frey, R., Bruhin, A., Dutilh, G., Hertwig, R., and Rieskamp, J. 2017. The risk elicitation puzzle. Nature Human Behaviour 1 (11): 803-809. Schechter, L. 2007. Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration exercise. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35 (1): 67-76. Servátka, M., and Theocharides, G.2011). Understanding Credit Risk: A Classroom Experiment. Journal of Economic Education 42 (1): 79-86. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., and Palmer, E. 2020. The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review 30: 100314. Wozny, N., Balser, C., and Ives, D. 2018. Evaluating the flipped classroom: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Economic Education 49 (2): 115-129.