Race to the podium: Separating and conjoining the car and driver in F1 racing

Rockerbie, Duane and Easton, Stephen (2021): Race to the podium: Separating and conjoining the car and driver in F1 racing.

Abstract

This paper provides a statistical estimate of the breakdown in race outcomes in Formula One races between the two most important inputs: driver skill and car technology. Financial data and racing results from the 2012-19 F1 seasons are used to estimate a combined driver and team censored regression model for each season. Treating each season uniquely allows for the exclusion of weather and track specific variables common to other statistical studies of F1 racing. Our use of financial data provides an answer to the economic question of how should F1 teams allocate their scarce financial resources. The so-called “80-20” rule distinguishing team effects and driver effects is found to be a very rough approximation to the output shares for teams and drivers. A strong complementarity exists between driver skill and car technology that distorts the rule. The return to driver salaries and team budgets are both positive in term of race outcomes, but at diminishing rates.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Formula one; salaries; budgets; finishes
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General

References

Barzel, Y. 1972. The rate of technical progress: The “Indianapolis 500”. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(1), 72-81.

Bell, A., Smith, J., Sabel, C. and K. Jones. 2016. Formula for success: Multilevel modelling of Formula One driver and constructor performance, 1950–2014. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 12(2), 99–112.

Boll, R. 2020. How to win in Formula One: Is it the driver or the car? The Correspondent. https://thecorrespondent.com/642/how-to-win-in-formula-one-is-it-the-driver-or-the-car/84931340736-b6c94330. Accessed on June 30, 2021.

Davidson, R. 2009. Reliable inference for the Gini index. Journal of Econometrics, 150, 30-40.

Eichenberger, R. and D. Stadelmann. 2009. Who is the best Formula One driver? An economic approach to evaluating talent. Economic Analysis and Policy, 30(3), 389-406.

Hill, R., Griffith, W. and G. Lim. 2017. Principles of econometrics, 5th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Judde, C., Booth, R. and R. Brooks. 2013. Second place is first of the losers: An analysis of competitive balance in Formula One. Journal of Sports Economics, 14(4), 411-439.

Lazear, E. and S. Rosen. 1981. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-864.

Mantel, S., Rosseger, G. and S. Mantel. 1995. Managing technology at the Indianapolis 500. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 48(1), 59-76.

Marino, A., Aversa, P., Mesquita, L. and J. Anand. 2015. Driving performance via exploration in changing environments: Evidence from Formula One racing. Organization Science, 26(4), 1079-1100.

Nalebuff, B. and J. Stiglitz. 1983. Prizes and incentives: An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 21-43.

Olkin, I. and J. Finn. 1995. Correlations redux. Psychology Bulletin, 118(1), 155-164.

Phillips, A. 2014. Uncovering Formula One driver performances from 1950 to 2013 by adjusting for team and competition effects. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 10(2), 261–278.