An exploration of the factors affecting the diffusion of Advanced Costing techniques: a comparative analysis of two surveys (1996-2005)

Cinquini, Lino and Collini, Paolo and Marelli, Alessandro and Tenucci, Andrea (2008): An exploration of the factors affecting the diffusion of Advanced Costing techniques: a comparative analysis of two surveys (1996-2005).

Abstract

The issue of cost calculation has been largely debated in the last years under the pressure of the perceived lost of relevance of the so called "traditional cost accounting approaches". The enthusiasm for new management accounting techniques has often driven most of attention towards technical or theoretical aspects of the proposed new cost models. In particular, Activity-Based Costing (ABC) implementation literature pinpoints a large number of studies that have looked at technical and organizational/behavioral factors that influence effective implementation. Recently a great attention has been paid by researchers on the contingent factors affecting the adoption of advanced management accounting techniques and the influence of the variables that drive towards higher levels of cost system sophistication. The need is felt for insightful studies regarding processes and contingent variables working through time in relation with these changes. Improved analysis can be obtained by undertaking replication studies based on larger number of responses and/or across geographic and cultural borders. Whitin the boundaries of a contingent framework analysis, this paper has provided additional insights into areas relating to factors influencing the level of sophistication of product cost systems in Italy. The paper presents the comparison of two survey results carried on in a ten years distance on the same sample of Italian largest companies. These two long-distance surveys provide the opportunity to assess the changes occurred in the companies that in 1996 declared the adoption of (or the interest in adopting) ABC and Target costing (Cinquini et al., 1999).Moreover, the time elapsed could allow the perception about adopters’ behavior, along different stages of the diffusion process of advanced costing techniques. The research findings pinpoint that only “importance of cost information” and “cost structure”, among the contextual variables considered in the more recent survey responses, are positive and significant in relation with increasing in implementation of advanced costing techniques. This outcome could open to further studies to assess whether or not adopters are moving from a “fad and fashion” behavior of the early stages, to a more rational approach in which the matching between management needs and tools potentiality is maximized.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Management accounting innovations, Activity-Based Costing, Target costing, Product costing design, Cost system sophistication, Contingent factors
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration

References

Abdel-Kader, M., Luther, R. (2008). The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A UK-based empirical analysis. The British Accounting Review, 40, 2-27.

Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16 (3), 586-612.

Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21, 254-285.

Al-Omiri, M., Drury, C. (2007). A survey of factors influencing the choice of product costing systems in UK organizations. Management Accounting Research, 18 (4), 399-424.

Anderson, S.H., Hesford, J.W., Young, S.M. (2002). Factors influencing the performance of activity based costing teams: a field study of ABC model development time in the automobile industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 195–211.

Askarany, D. (2005). Diffusion of innovations in organizations. In M. Khosrow-Pour, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology. New York: IDEA Group Publishing.

Askarany, D., Smith, M., Yazdifar, H. (2007). Attributes of innovation and the implementation of managerial tools: an activity-based management technique. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 1 (1), 98-114.

Atkinson, A.A., Banker, R.D., Kaplan, R.S., Young, S.M. (2001). Management Accounting. 3rd ed., New York: Prentice Hall.

Baird, K.M., Harrison, G.L., Reeve, R.C. (2004). Adoption of activity management practices: a note on the extent of adoption and the influence of organizational and cultural factors. Management Accounting Research, 15 (4), 383-399.

Bjørnenak, T. (1997). Diffusion and accounting: the case of ABC in Norway. Management Accounting Research, 8 (1), 3-17.

Brierley, J.A., Cowton, C.J., Drury, C. (2001). Research into product costing practice: a European perspective. European Accounting Review, 10 (2), 215 - 256.

Bromwich, M., Bhimani, A. (1994). Management Accounting: Pathways to progress. London: CIMA publishing.

Cagwin, D., Bouwman, M.J. (2002). The association between activity-based costing and impovement in financial performance. Management Accounting Research, 13 (1), 1-39.

Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chenhall, R.H., Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a system approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23 (3), 243-264.

Chenhall, R.H. (2003). Management Control System design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 123-168.

Cinquini, L., Collini, P., Marelli, A., Quagli, A., Silvi, R. (1999). A survey on cost accounting practices in Italian large and medium size manufacturing firms. 22th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association. May 5-7, Bordeaux.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cooper, R. (1988a). The rise of Activity-Based Costing - Part One: What is an Activity-Based Cost System? Journal of Cost Management, Summer, 45-54.

Cooper, R. (1988b). The rise of Activity-Based Costing - Part Two: When do I need an Activity-Based Cost System? Journal of Cost Management, Fall, 41-48.

Cooper, R. (1989). The rise of Activity-Based Costing - Part Three: How many cost drivers do you need and how do you select them? Journal of Cost Management, Winter, 34-45.

Cyert, R.M., March, J.G. (1992). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. 2nd ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Drazin, R., Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (4), 514-539.

Drury, C., Tayles, M. (1994). Product costing in UK manufacturing organizations. European Accounting Review, 3 (3), 443 - 470.

Drury, C., Tayles, M. (2005). Explicating the design of overhead absorption procedures in UK organizations. The British Accounting Review, 37(1), 47-84.

Estrin, T.L., Kantor, J., Albers, D. (1994). Is ABC Suitable for Your Company? Management Accounting, April, 40 - 45.

Gerdin, J., Greve, J. (2004). Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research—a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3-4), 303-326.

Gerdin, J., Greve, J. (2007). The appropriateness of statistical methods for testing contingency hypotheses in 17 management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.07.003.

Gosselin, M. (1997). The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22 (2), 105-122.

Hoque, Z. (2000). Just-in-time production, automation, cost allocation practices and importance of cost information: an empirical investigation in new zealand-based manufacturing organizations. The British Accounting Review, 32 (2), 133-159.

Ifinedo, P., Nahar, N. (2006). Do top- and mid-level managers view Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems success measures differently? International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 3 (6), 618 - 635.

Innes, J., Mitchell, F. (1995). A survey of activity-based costing in the U.K.'s largest companies. Management Accounting Research, 6 (2), 137-153.

Innes, J., Mitchell, F., Sinclair, D. (2000). Activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results. Management Accounting Research, 11 (3), 349-362.

Johnson, H.T., Kaplan, R.S. (1987). Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Johnson, H.T. (1992). Relevance Regained: From Top-down control to Bottom-up empowerment. New York: The Free Press.

Jones, T.C., Dugdale, D. (2001). The concept of an accounting regime. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12 (1), 35-63.

Kaplan, R.S. (1988). One Cost System Isn't Enough. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 61-66.

Kaplan, R.S., Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & Effect. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Kennedy, T., Affleck-Graves, J. (2001). The Impact of Activity-Based Costing on Firm Performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13 (1), 19-45.

Luft, J., Shields, M.D. (2003). Mapping management accounting: Graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 169-249.

Lukka, K., Granlund, M. (1996). Cost accounting in Finland: current practice and trends of development. European Accounting Review, 5 (1), 1 - 28.

Malmi, T. (1999). Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22 (8), 649-672.

Miller, J., Vollman, T. (1985). The Hidden Factory. Harvard Business Review, 63 (5), 142-150.

Nanni, A.J., Dixon, J.R., Vollman, T.E. (1992). Integrated Performance Measurement: Management Accounting to support the new manufacturing realities. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 4 (Fall), 1-19.

Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.

Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.

Shank, J.K., Govindarajan, V. (1988). The Perils of Cost Allocation Based on Production Volumes. Accounting Horizons, 58-62.

Teece, D.J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource costs of transferring technological know-how. Economic Journal, 31, 242-261.