Umaroh, Rodhiah and Pangaribowo, Evita Hanie (2019): The Analysis of Protein Consumption Pattern in Indonesia: A Case of Own-produced Commodities.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_109161.pdf Download (256kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Recently, the indicator of food security in Indonesia has improved, covering not only food availability but also food utilization. The household consumption pattern has shifted from carbohydrates to other nutrients including protein, though the change is relatively insignificant. One of the ways for the households to meet their needs for protein is by farming their protein sources. Households having own-produced food will prefer their food crops especially when the foodstuff price increases. This study aims to analyze the protein food consumption pattern from either plants or animals. It applies the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) to estimate households’ responses towards price and expenditure changes, especially for own-produced food commodities. The results reveal that when the price of animal-based protein increases, households will likely to consume cheaper protein from plants. The value of the own price elasticity is more inelastic in rural and poor households. This indicates that when there is price upsurge, those households tend to consume self-grown protein sources. It is also suggested that the small scale farming can act as a household strategy to improve their food security.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Analysis of Protein Consumption Pattern in Indonesia: A Case of Own-produced Commodities |
English Title: | The Analysis of Protein Consumption Pattern in Indonesia: A Case of Own-produced Commodities |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | protein, food consumption, QUAIDS, own-produced food |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy |
Item ID: | 109161 |
Depositing User: | Rodhiah Umaroh Umaroh |
Date Deposited: | 02 Nov 2021 02:36 |
Last Modified: | 02 Nov 2021 02:36 |
References: | 1. Le CQ. An Empirical Study of Food Demand in Vietnam. Asean Econ Bull [Internet]. 2008;25(3):AE25-3C. Available from: http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg/ISEAS/DoiBook.jsp?cSeriesCode=AE25/3&cArticleNo=c 2. BPS. Konsumsi Kalori dan Protein Penduduk Indonesia dan Provinsi. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik; 2017. 3. Singh PK, Young-soo S, Toole D, Minh LL. Regional report on nutrition security in asean [Internet]. Vol. 2. 2016. 155 p. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/eapro/12205_22043.html%0Awww.unicef.org/eapro%0Awww.asean.org 4. FAO. Country Fact Sheet on Food and Agriculture Policy Trends. 2017. 5. Fintel D Von, Pienaar L. Small-Scale Farming and Food Security: The Enabling Role of Cash Transfers in South Africa’s Former Homelands. 2016. 6. Sabo BB, Isah SD, Chamo AM, Rabiu MA. Role of Smallholder Farmers in Nigeria’s Food Security Role of Smallholder Farmers in Nigeria’s Food Security. J Agric Sci. 2018;7(1):1–5. 7. Ahmad N, Sheikh MR, Saeed K. Rural Urban Food Consumption Analysis in Pakistan : Expenditure Elasticities Approach. Pakistan J Commer Soc Sci. 2015;9(1):159–70. 8. Dev SM, Sharma AN. Food Security in India : Performance, Challenges and Policies. Oxfam India Work Pap Ser (OIWPS)- VII. 2010;(September):1–40. 9. Jin S. Determinants of fish consumption by household type in China Article information : Br Food J. 2015;117(4):1273–88. 10. Musa U. Analysis of Consumption Expenditure on Animal Protein by Households in Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Ahamdu Bello University; 2015. 11. Wahyuni D, Purnastuti L, Mustofa. Analisis Elastisitas Tiga Bahan Pangan Sumber Protein Hewani di Indonesia. J Econ. 2016;12(1):43–53. 12. Rampal P. An analysis of protein consumption in India through plant and animal sources. 2018. (LANSA Working Paper Series; vol. 2018). 13. Banks J, Blundell R, Lewbel A. Quadratic Engel Curves and Consumer Demand James. Rev Econ Stat [Internet]. 1997;79(4):527–39. Available from: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%28199711%2979%3A4%3C527%3AQECACD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z 14. Abdulai A. Household Demand for Food in Switzerland . A Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System. Swiss Soc Econ Stat. 2002;138(I):1–18. 15. Kumar P, Kumar A, Parappurathu S, Raju SS. Estimation of Demand Elasticity for Food Commodities in India. Agric Econ Res Rev [Internet]. 2011;24(June):1–14. Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:aerr&volume=24&issue=1&article=001 16. Molina JA, Gil AI. The Demand Behavior of Consumers in Peru: A Demographic Analysis Using the QUAIDS. J Dev Areas [Internet]. 2005;39(1):191–206. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/journal_of_developing_areas/v039/39.1molina.pdf 17. Kementerian Kesehatan. Penyakit Jantung Penyebab Kematian Tertinggi, Kemenkes Ingatkan CERDIK [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 28]. Available from: www.depkes.go.id/article/view/17073100005/penyakit-jantung-penyebab-kematian-tertinggi-kemenkes-ingatkan-cerdik-.html 18. Setiana R. Analisis Konsumsi Pangan dan Makronutrien Rumah Tangga di Provinsi Lampung. Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2019. 19. Wardhani AT. The Impact of Own Produced Consumption on Rural Households ’ Consumption Patterns. J Ekon dan Kebijak Publik. 2017;8(1):13–25. 20. Mittal S. Application of The QUAIDS Model to the Food Sector in India. J Quant Econ. 2010;8(1). 21. Haider A, Zaid M. Food Consumption Patterns and Nutrition Disparity in Pakistan. 2017; 22. Pangaribowo EH, Tsegai D. Food demand analysis of Indonesian households with particular attention to the poorest. ZEF-Discussion Pap Dev Policy. 2011;(151). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/109161 |