How Can Korea be a Role Model for Catch-up Development? A ‘Capability-based View’

Lee, Keun (2013): How Can Korea be a Role Model for Catch-up Development? A ‘Capability-based View’. Published in: Achieving Development Sucess: Strategies and Lessons from the Developing World No. ed. A. Fosu. Oxford Univ Press (2013): pp. 1-24.

Abstract

This paper proposes a “capability-based view” on the Korean or Asian experience in catching-up development. This approach may be considered as an extension of technology-based view but want to keep distance from the government-market dichotomy as it has more sound micro-economic foundation. The reason we are taking this view is that the real lesson from the Korean achievement is not from the role of government in economic development but from the fact that it was able to build firms’ capability and thereby sustained growth for several decades.

Sustained growth for several decades is not easy, and there are numerous cases where macro-based reform brought in immediate recovery but was not sustained, and eventually the economy fell into another round of crisis. The most fundamental barriers to sustained development is whether to build local capabilities or not. We contend that without some critical degree of capabilities, growth, which is based on lower wage rates or simple price competitiveness, tends to be short-lived or not sustained.

The discussion in this paper suggests that the Korean economy had laid the basis for a transition from a middle- to high-income country by building up technological capabilities around the early to mid 1980s. The early to mid 1980s is when the R&D/GDP ratio surpassed 1%, the share of private R&D exceeded the half to reach around 70%, and the share of corporate patent became large than that by individual inventors., Based on these capabilities, Korea was able to make the transition from an upper middle income to high income countries; its per capital GDP in 1980 was around 1,673 dollars in nominal terms and 3223 dollars in the 2000 dollar terms and became 10,890 in 2000 (Lee and Kim 2009, table 1).

Tertiary school enrollment rate jumped from around 10% in 1980 to higher than 30% in 1985 and finally higher than 70% in 2000 (Lee 2006, table 5). R&D/GDP ratio was around 0.7% in 1980, increased to 1.5% in 1985 and to almost 2% in 2000. In contrast, trade/GDP ratio was already as high as 70% in 1980 and stayed around that level by 2000. These figures clearly indicate that it is not more openings but capability building associated with tertiary education and private R&D that has made the transition possible.

Final section of the paper discusses the issue of transferability of the Korean model, focusing on the role of the government, .possibility of state activism in the WTO environment, and role of locally-owned firms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Korea, Economic Development, Capability
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General

References

Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s Next Giant. New York: Oxford University Press.

Amsden, A., and W.-W. Chu (2003). Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bae, Y.-H. (1995). ‘Technology Absorption and R&D in the Korean Semiconductor Industry: The Case Study of Samsung Electronics Co.’. Korea: Seoul National University. PhD thesis.

Chang, H.-J. (1994). The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. New York: St. Martin Press.

Chang, H.-J., and J. Shin (2002). Restructuring ‘Korea Inc.’: Evaluating the Post-crisis Corporate Restructuring in Korea.

Choo, K., K. Lee, K. Ryu, and J. Yoon (2009). ‘Changing Performance of the Business Groups over Two Decades: Technological Capabilities and Investment Inefficiency in Korean Chaebols’. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57 (2): 359-86.

Commission on Growth and Development (2008). The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Dahlman, C., L. E. Westphal, and L. Kim (1985). ‘Reflections on Acquisition of Technological Capability’. In N. Rosenberg and C. Frisctak (eds), International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures and Comparisons. New York: Pagamon.

Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Hobday, M. (1995). Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Hobday, M. (2000). ‘East versus Southeast Asian Innovation Systems: Comparing OEM- and TNC-led Growth in Electronics’. In L. Kim and R. Nelson (eds), Technology, Learning and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kim. L. (1996). Imitation to Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Lall, S. (1996) Learning from the Asian Tigers: Studies in Technology and Industrial Policy. London and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin’s Press.

Lee, C. (1992). ‘The Government, Financial System, and Large Private Enterprises in the Economic Development of South Korea’. World Development, 20 (2): 187-97.

Lee, C., and K. Lee (2008). ‘The Miracle to Crisis and the Mirage of the Post-crisis Reform in Korea: An After-Ten year Assessment’. Journal of Asian Economics, 19 (5-6): 425-37.

Lee, K. (2005). ‘Making a Technological Catch-up: Barriers and Opportunities’. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13 (2): 97-131.

Lee, K. (2006). ‘The Washington Consensus and East Asian Sequencing: Understanding Reform in East and South Asia’. In J. Fanelli and G. McMahon (eds), Understanding Market Reforms, vol. 2. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Lee, K., and Y. Kim (2010). ‘IPRs and Technological Catch-up in Korea’. In H. Odagiri, A. Goto, A. Sunami and R. Nelson (eds), Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch Up: An International Comparative Study. Oxford University Press

Lee, K., and B. Y. Kim (2009). ‘Both Institutions and Policies Matter but Differently for Different Income Groups of Countries: Determinants of Long-Run Economic Growth Revisited’. World Development, 37 (3): 533-49.

Lee, K., and C. Lim (2001). ‘Technological Regimes, Catch-up and Leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean Industries’. Research Policy, 30 (3): 459-483.

Lee, K., and J. Mathews (2012). ‘Firms in Korea and Taiwan: Upgrading in the same industry and entries into new industries ’. In J. Cantwell and E. Amann (eds), The Innovative firms in the Emerging Market Economies. Oxford University Press.

Lee, K., S. Mani, and Q. Mu (2012). ‘Explaining divergent stories of catch-up in the telecommunication equipment industry in Brazil, China, India, and Korea’. In F. Malerba and R. Nelson (eds). Development as a Learning Process. Oxford University Press.

Lee, K., B. Kim, C. Lee, and J. Yee (2008). ‘Visible Success and Invisible Failure in Post-Crisis Reform in Korea’. Development and Society, 37 (1): 23-53.

Mathews, J. A. (2002). ‘The Origins and Dynamics of Taiwan’s R&D Consortia’. Research Policy, 31: 633-51.

Mathews. J. A. (2005). ‘Strategy and the Crystal Cycle’. California Management Review, 47 (2): 6-31.

Mathews, J. A. (2006). ‘Catch-up Strategies and the Latecomer Effect in Industrial Development’. New Political Economy, 11 (3): 313-36.

Mathews, J. A., and D. S. Cho (2000). Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mu, Q., and K. Lee (2005). ‘Knowledge Diffusion and Technological Leapfrogging: the Case of Telecommunication Industry in China’. Research Policy, 34 (6): 759-83.

Ocampo, J. A. (ed.) (2005). Beyond Reforms: Structural Dynamics and Macroeconomic Stability. Stanford: Stanford University Press for the ECLAC.

OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1992). Technology and Economy: The Key Relationships. Paris: OECD.

OECD (1996). Reviews of National Science and Technology Policy: Republic of Korea, Paris: OECD.

Park, K., and K. Lee (2006). ‘Linking Technological Regimes and Technological Catch-up: Analysis of Korea and Taiwan Using the US Patent Data’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16: 4 (July).

Rodrik, D. (1996a). ‘Coordination Failures and Government Policy: A Model with Applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe’. Journal of International Economics, 40 (1/2): 1-22.

Rodrik, D. (1996b). ‘Understanding Economic Policy Reforms’. The Journal of Economic Literature, 34 (1): 9-41.

Rodrik, D. (2006). ‘Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform’. Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (4): 973-87.

Teece, D. (2000). ‘Firm Capabilities and Economic Development’. In L. Kim and R. Nelson (eds), Technology, Learning and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Utterback. J. M., and W. J. Abernathy (1975). ‘A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation’. Omega, 3 (6): 640-56.

Vernon, R. (1966). ‘International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 190-207.

World Bank (1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

World Bank (2005). Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank