Uzuntepe, Beren (2021): A Brief Comparison of Most Prominent Crowdfunding Platforms in Turkey and USA.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_109966.pdf Download (335kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Emerging and gaining significance due to the widespread use of the Internet and the power of social media, crowdfunding, via crowdfunding platforms, provides entrepreneurs with creative business ideas with the opportunity to reach extensive masses and to be able to directly access the financial resources that their projects require. Even though the interest in crowdfunding rises, the literature seems to lack enough research about these platforms. Addressing the platforms that bring together the entrepreneurs and the backers, this research aims to compare the reward-based crowdfunding platforms operating in Turkey with the international crowdfunding platforms. Containing the categories of technology and movie/video, this research discusses the differences between the most prominent crowdfunding platforms in the two countries. The findings of the research constitute importance due to the fact that it shows the way to the entrepreneurs, crowdfunding platforms, and backers while making their decisions, encourages participation in the campaigns, and sheds light on other studies about the subject.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Brief Comparison of Most Prominent Crowdfunding Platforms in Turkey and USA |
English Title: | A Brief Comparison of Most Prominent Crowdfunding Platforms in Turkey and USA |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Keywords: Crowdfunding, Entrepreneurial Finance, Online Platform, Reward Based Crowdfunding, KIA |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G24 - Investment Banking ; Venture Capital ; Brokerage ; Ratings and Ratings Agencies G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L26 - Entrepreneurship M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M13 - New Firms ; Startups O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P34 - Financial Economics P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P35 - Public Economics |
Item ID: | 109966 |
Depositing User: | Beren Uzuntepe |
Date Deposited: | 10 Oct 2021 23:26 |
Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2021 23:26 |
References: | 1.Rossi, Alice, and Silvio Vismara. “What Do Crowdfunding Platforms Do? A Comparison BETWEEN INVESTMENT-BASED Platforms in Europe.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2988965. 2.Kromidha, Endrit. “A Comparative Analysis of Online Crowdfunding Platforms in USA, Europe and Asia.” EChallenges e-2015 Conference, 2015, doi:10.1109/echallenges.2015.7441070. 3.Mollick, Ethan R., and Ramana Nanda. “Wisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in Funding the Arts.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2443114. 4.Kayhan, Sezen. “FONGOGO: A Case Study on the Usability of the LOCAL Crowdfunding and Fundraising Websites in Turkey.” HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 9, 2017, doi:10.20304/humanitas.318510. 5.Cumming, Douglas J.,Leboeuf G., Schwienbacher A., “Crowdfunding Models: Keep-It-All vs. All-or-Nothing.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2447567. 6.Cumming, Douglas J., Zhang Yelin “Are Crowdfunding Platforms Active and Effective Intermediaries?” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2882026. 7.Çubukçu, Ceren. Kitlesel Fonlama: Türkiye’Deki KITLESEL Fonlama, betadergi.com/jeim/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/88-published.pdf. 8.Zhang, Yi. An Empirical Study into the Crowdfunding, 2012, Lund University. 9.Sakarya Şakir, Bezirgan Elif, Kitlesel Fonlama Platformları: Türkiye ve Yurtdışı Karşılaştırması, 2018, Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 10.Mollick, E. (2014) “The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study,” Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1): 1-16. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/109966 |