National innovation rates: the evidence for/against domestic institutions

Taylor, Mark Zachary (2007): National innovation rates: the evidence for/against domestic institutions.

Abstract

Why are some countries more technologically innovative than others? The dominant explanation amongst political-economists is that domestic institutions determine national innovation rates. However, after decades of research, there is still no agreement on precisely how this happens, exactly which institutions matter, and little aggregate evidence has been produced to support any particular hypothesis. This paper will review the equivocating evidence for domestic institutions explanations of national innovation rates. Its survey will show that, although a specific domestic institution or policy might appear to explain a particular instance of innovation, they generally fail to explain national innovation rates across time and space. Instead, the empirical evidence suggests that certain kinds of international relationships (e.g. capital goods imports, foreign direct investment, educational exchanges) affect national innovation rates in the aggregate, and that these relationships are not themselves determined by domestic institutions. In other words, explaining national innovation rates may not be so much a domestic institutions story as it is an international story.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: technology; technological; innovation; politics; institutions; research
• Subjects: P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology

References

Acemoglu, Daron. 2003. “Why Not a Political Coase Theorem? Social Conflict, Commitment, and Politics.” Journal of Comparative Economics 31(4):620-652.

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Lelarge C., Van Reenen, H., & Zilibotti, F. 2006. Technology, Information, and the Decentralization of the Firm. Working Paper 12206. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, James Robinson. 2005. “Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth” in Handbook of Economic Growth ed. Philippe Aghion & Steve Durlauf (Amsterdam : Elsevier);

Acemoglu, Daron and James A. Robinson. 2000. American Economic Review 90(2):126-130;

Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt. 1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Amsden, Alice H. 2001. The Rise Of "The Rest": Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Amsden, Alice H. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization New York, NY: Oxford Univ Press.

Amsden, Alice H. and Wan-wen chu. 2003. Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies MIT Press.

Archer, Biglaiser and DeRouen. 2007. Sovereign Bonds and the “Democratic Advantage”: Does Regime Type Affect Credit Rating Agency Ratings in the Developing World? International Organization 61(2): 341-365.

Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. “Economics of Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention” in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity edited by Nelson, Richard R., 609-626. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Press.

Balaz V. 2005. “Innovation policy in the Slovak Republic” Politicka Ekonomie 53(4): 513-526.

Bimber, Bruce. 1994. “Three Faces of Technological Determinism” in Does Technology Drive History: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, edited by Merrit Roe Smith and Leo Marx, ¬79-100. MIT Press.

Biglaiser G, DeRouen K. 2006. Economic reforms and inflows of foreign direct investment in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 41(1): 51-75.

Braun, Sebastian. 2006. Core labour standards and FDI: Friends or foes? The case of child labour. Review of World Economics 142(4): 765-791.

Breznitz, Dan. 2007. Innovation and the State. New Haven: Yale University Press

Burke, James. 1978. Connections. Film (Documentary) BBC and Time Life.

Busse M. 2004. Transnational corporations and repression of political rights and civil liberties: An empirical analysis. Kyklos 57(1): 45-65

Cantwell, J. 1995. “The Globalization of Technology - What Remains of the Product Cycle Model Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 155-174 Cary, William L. 1974. “Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware” Yale Law Journal 83(4): 663- 705.

Correa CM. 1998 “Argentina's National Innovation System” International Journal of Technology Management 15 (6-7): 721-760.

Cowan, Ruth Schwartz, 1997. A Social History of American Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

De Tournemine RL, Muller E. 1996. “Transition and development of innovation capacities in Hungary” R & D Management 26 (2): 101-114

Delios, Andrew and Witold J. Henisz. 2000. "Japanese Firms' Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies" Academy of Management Journal 43(3):305-323

Dore, Ronald. 1987. Taking Japan Seriously: A Confucian Perspective on Leading Economic Issues. Stanford Press.

Drezner, Daniel. 2001. “State Structure, Technological Leadership and the Maintenance of Hegemony” Review of International Studies 27(1): 3-25.

Edquist, Charles. 1997. Systems of Innovation : Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. Wash, DC: Pinter

Egger P, Winner H . 2004. Economic freedom and taxation: Is there a Trade-off in the locational competition between countries? Public Choice 118 (3-4): 271-288

Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York, NY : Basic Books.

Freeman, Christopher. 1995. “The ‘National System of Innovation’ in Historical Perspective” Cambridge Journal of Economics 19:5-24.

Gallagher ME. 2002. Reform and openness: Why China's economic reforms have delayed democracy. World Politics 54 (3): 338+

Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press

Habakkuk, H.J. 1962. American and British Technology in the 19th Century. Cambridge Univ. Press.

Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2001. “The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools” Working Paper 8498. Cambridge, MA.: NBER.

Hall, Peter A. and David Soskice. 2001. “Introduction” in Varieties of Capitalism : TheInstitutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Edited by Hall, Peter A. and David Soskice, 1-68. New York, NY: Oxford Press.

Hall Robert E., and Charles I. Jones. 1999. “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1): 83-116.

Hamilton, Alexander. 1791. Report on the Subject of Manufacturers

Harms P, Ursprung HW. 2002. Do civil and political repression really boost foreign direct investments? Economic Inquiry 40(4): 651-663

Hayek, Friedrich A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35(4): 519-530

Henisz, Witold J. 2002. "The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment" Industrial and Corporate Change 11(2): 355-389.

Henisz, Witold J. 2000. "The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth" Economics & Politics 12(1): 1-31.

Henisz, Witold J. & Bennet A Zelner. 2001. "The Institutional Environment for Telecommunications Investment" Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1): 123-147.

Hicks, J. 1932. Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.

Jensen NM. 2003. Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization 57(3): 587-616.

Jeremy, David J. (ed.). 1991. International technology transfer: Europe, Japan, and the USA, 1700-1914 E. Elgar.

Keller, William. 2004. “International Technology Diffusion” Journal of Economic Literature 42(3): 752-782

Kim, Linsu. and Richard R. Nelson (eds). 2000. Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies. Cambridge, U.K. : New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.

Leontief, Wassily. 1954. “Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined” Economia Internazionale 7.

Li Q, Resnick A. 2003. Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to developing countries. International Organization 57(1)

List, Friedrich. 1841. Das Nationale System der Politischen Oekonomie (National System of Political Economy).

Lundvall, Bengt-Ake. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning .London, UK: St. Martin's Press.

Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton University Press.

Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford Univ Press.

Mowrey, David C. and Nathan Rosenberg. 1993. “The U.S. National Innovation System” in Nelson, Richard R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

NBER 2001. NBER Patent Dataset. database available at http://www.nber.org/patents

Nelson, Richard.R. 2005. Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.

Nelson, Richard R. 1997. “How New Is New Growth Theory” Challenge 40(5):29-58.

Nelson, Richard R (ed). 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford Press.

Nelson, Richard R. 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research" Journal of Political Economy 67(3): 297-306

North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance Cambridge University Press.

North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.

North, Douglass and Robert P. Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Oates, Wallace. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Odagiri, Hiroyuki and Akira Goto “The Japanese System of Innovation: Past, Present, and Future” in Nelson, Richard R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford Univ Press.

Oinas P. 2005. “Finland: A Success Story?” European Planning Studies 13(8): 1227-1244.

Porter, Michael E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, NY: Free Press.

Qian, Yingyi and Barry R. Weingast. 1997. “Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 83-92.

Rodrik, Dani. 2000. “Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them” Studies in Comparative International Development 35(3): 3-31

Rogers, Everett. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press

Romer, Paul M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5):S71-S102.

Rosenberg, N. & Birdzell, L.E. 1985. How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Saad M, Zawdie G. 2005. “From Technology Transfer to the Emergence of a Triple Helix Culture: The Experience of Algeria in Innovation and Technological Capability Development” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17(1): 89-103.

Shilts, R. 1987. And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Smith, Merritt Roe ed. 1985. Military Enterprise and Technological Change: Perspectives on the American Experience. MIT Press.

Sun, Y.F. 2002. “China's National Innovation System in Transition” Eurasian Geography and Economics 43(6): 476-492.

Surowiecki, J. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why The Many Are Smarter Than The Few And How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations. New York: Doubleday.

Taylor, Mark Z. 2007a. “Political Decentralization and Technological Innovation: Testing The Innovative Advantages of Decentralized States” Review of Policy Research 24(3):231-257

Taylor, Mark Z. 2007b. “The International Determinants of National Innovation Rates: An Exploratory Probe” Georgia Tech Working Paper #7.11.07 (available at mzak.net/research)

Taylor, Mark Z. 2006. “Political Decentralization and Technological Change: Hypotheses From Comparative Case Studies in Blood and Electricity” Georgia Tech Working Paper #10.22.06 (available at mzak.net/research)

Taylor Mark Z. 2004. “Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation” International Organization 58 (3): 601-631.

Taylor Mark Z. 1995. “Dominance Through Technology" Foreign Affairs 74(6): 14-20.

Tiebout, Charles. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416-424

Walker, Jack L. 1969. "The Diffusion of Innovations Among the Various States," American Political Science Review 63(3): 880-899

Watts, R.L. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems Kingston, ONT: McGill-Queens University. Press.

Weingast, Barry R. 1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11(1): 1-31.

Yamashita, Shoichi (ed.) 1991. Transfer of Japanese Technology and Management to the ASEAN Countries. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.