Saruta, Fuyuki (2021): Exclusive contracts and multihoming agents in two-sided markets.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_110070.pdf Download (653kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We investigate a two-sided market model in which two platforms compete for sellers and buyers who can participate in multiple platforms (multihoming), and one of the two platforms can make exclusive contracts with sellers. The platform faces a trade-off when it enters into exclusivity agreements with sellers, which gives it an advantage when competing for buyers but reduces its revenue from the seller side. In addition, we expect that the existence of multihoming buyers weakens the platform's incentive to have an exclusive contract with sellers. Even when buyers can multihome, does a platform have an incentive to make exclusive contracts with sellers? If so, how does exclusive dealing affect social welfare? We obtain the following results. First, in equilibrium, the platform makes exclusive contracts with all sellers or not at all. If sellers' network externality on buyers is sufficiently large (small), it chooses fully exclusive dealing (nonexclusive dealing). Second, exclusive dealing is preferable (detrimental) to social welfare when the network externality is sufficiently large (small). Exclusive dealing encourages the multihoming of buyers, which allows agents to have more interactions on one platform and prompts more buyers to obtain stand-alone benefits from multiple platforms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Exclusive contracts and multihoming agents in two-sided markets |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Exclusive contracts; Two-sided markets; Multihoming; Platform competition. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks |
Item ID: | 110070 |
Depositing User: | Fuyuki Saruta |
Date Deposited: | 08 Oct 2021 18:21 |
Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2021 18:21 |
References: | Armstrong, Mark (2006) “Competition in two-sided markets,” The RAND Journal ofEconomics, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 668–691. Armstrong, Mark and Julian Wright (2007) “Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts,” Economic Theory, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 353–380. Athey, Susan, Emilio Calvano, and Joshua S. Gans (2018) “The Impact of Consumer Multi-homing on Advertising Markets and Media Competition,” Management Science, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 1574–1590. Bakos, Yannis and Hanna Halaburda (2020) “Platform Competition with Multihoming onBoth Sides: Subsidize or Not?” Management Science, Vol. 66, No. 12, pp. 5599–5607. Belleflamme, Paul and Martin Peitz (2019) “Platform competition: Who benefits from multihoming?”International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 64, pp. 1–26. Bork, Robert H. (1978) The antitrust paradox : a policy at war with itself: Basic Books New York. Brühn, Tim and Georg Götz (2018) “Exclusionary practices in two-sided markets: The effect of radius clauses on competition between shopping centers,”Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 577–590. Bryan, Kevin A. and Joshua S. Gans (2019) “A theory of multihoming in ride share competition,”Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 89–96. Caillaud, Bernard and Bruno Jullien (2001) “Competing Cybermediaries,”European Economic Review, Vol. 45, pp. 797–808. Caillaud, Bernard and Bruno Jullien (2003) “Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers,”The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 309–328. Calzolari, Giacomo and Vincenzo Denicolò (2013) “Competition with Exclusive Contracts and Market-Share Discounts,”American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 6, pp. 2384–2411. Calzolari, Giacomo and Vincenzo Denicolò (2015) “Exclusive Contracts and Market Dominance,” American Economic Re-view, Vol. 105, No. 11, pp. 3321–3351. Carroni, Elias, Leonardo Madio, and Shiva Shekhar (2021) “Superstar exclusivity in two-sided markets,” Available at SSRN, URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3243777. Chica, Kenneth Chuk, Cristian and Jorge Tamayo (2021) “Exclusive Dealing and Entryby Competing Two-Sided Platforms,” Harvard Business School Working Paper, No.21-092. Choi, Jay Pil (2010) “Tying in Two-sided Markets with Multi-homing,” The Journal ofIndustrial Economics, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 607–626. Chowdhury, Subhasish M. and Stephen Martin (2017) “Exclusivity and exclusion on platform Markets,” Journal of Economics, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 95–118. Corts, Kenneth and Mara Lederman (2009) “Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the U.S. home video game market,” International Journal of IndustrialOrganization, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 121–136. Doganoglu, Toker and Julian Wright (2010) “Exclusive dealing with network effects,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 145–154. Evans, David and Richard Schmalensee (2015) “The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-sidedPlatform Businesses,” in Blair, Roger D. and D. Daniel Sokol eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Antitrust Economics, Vol. 1: Oxford University Press, pp. 404–449. Hagiu, Andrei (2006) “Pricing and Commitment by Two-Sided Platforms,”The RANDJournal of Economics, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 720–737. Hagiu, Andrei and Robin S. Lee (2011) “Exclusivity and Control,” Journal of Economics& Management Strategy, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 679–708. Ishihara, Akifumi and Ryoko Oki (2021) “Exclusive content in two-sided markets,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 638–654. Katz, Michael L. (2019) “Platform economics and antitrust enforcement: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 28, No.1, pp. 138–152. Kitamura, Hiroshi, Noriaki Matsushima, and Misato Sato (2018) “Exclusive contracts with complementary inputs,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 56, pp. 145–167. Landsman, Vardit and Stefan Stremersch (2011) “Multihoming in Two-Sided Markets: An Empirical Inquiry in the Video Game Console Industry,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.75, No. 6, pp. 39–54. Lee, Robin S. (2013) “Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-SidedMarkets,” American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 7, pp. 2960–3000. Liu, Chunchun, T. Teh, Julian Wright, and J. Zhou (2020) “Multihoming and oligopolistic platform competition.” Liu, Ke and Xiaoxuan Meng (2021) “Exclusive dealing when upstream displacement is possible,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Forthcoming. OECD (2018) “Rethinking Antitrust Tools for Multi-Sided Platforms,” URL: http://www.oecd.org/competition/rethinking-antitrust-tools-for-multi-sided-platforms.htm. Posner, Richard A. (1976) Antitrust law, an economic perspective: University of Chicago Press. Rochet, Jean-Charles and Jean Tirole (2003) “Platform competition in two-sided markets,” Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 990–1029. Rochet, Jean-Charles and Jean Tirole (2006) “Two-sided markets: a progress report,” The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 645–667. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/110070 |