Valerio, Stefano and Postiglione, Monica and Sanna, Venere Stefania and Bassetti, Chiara and Priora, Giulia and Hendrickson, Cary Yungmee (2021): Italian Style: Legislative Developments in Accommodation, Mobility, Food, Delivery, and Transport in Italy's Collaborative and Sharing Economy. Published in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_110236.pdf Download (360kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This contribution pays special attention to the Italian legal framework concerning the collaborative and sharing economy (CSE), with a focus on those economic initiatives which are platform mediated. This choice is due to the importance of the concept of “platform” in the definitions of the CSE provided at both the Italian and the European levels. As highlighted in some studies, most actors of the CSE can be considered not only economic disruptors but also policy disruptors (Biber et al. 2017). Thus, the chapter tries to shed light on the difficulties Italian regulators had while dealing with the emergence of these actors, especially in sectors such as food, accommodation, delivery, and transport. Italian policymakers were not able to design new regulatory frameworks to cope with the challenges of CSE, privileging bans (for Uber) or almost total deregulation (for Airbnb) over the elaboration of innovative rules. Regarding the issue of digital labour, the Italian legislator adopted a partial solution, creating a framework that dualizes the labour market, maybe with the aim of satisfying both digital workers and platforms. Overall, it seems that the Italian ecosystem of the CSE is bound to evolve, especially after the appearance of the health crisis related to the COVID-19.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Italian Style: Legislative Developments in Accommodation, Mobility, Food, Delivery, and Transport in Italy's Collaborative and Sharing Economy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Collaborative Economy; Global and Local Case Examples; Hungary; Platform Economy; Ride-Sharing; Sharing Economy; Short-Term Rental; Social Innovation |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L86 - Information and Internet Services ; Computer Software |
Item ID: | 110236 |
Depositing User: | Andrzej Klimczuk |
Date Deposited: | 21 Oct 2021 13:33 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2021 13:33 |
References: | Aloisi, A. (2020). Hierarchies without firm? Vertical disintegration, personal outsourcing and the nature of the platform. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3124389. Accessed: 29 May 2020. Arviddson, A. and Luise, V. (2019). Il sistema delle start-up e l'innovazione possibile (The start-ups system and the possible innovation). il Mulino, 6. https://doi.org/10.1402/95616. Biber, E., Light, S.E., Ruhl, J.B., Salzman, J. (2017). Regulating Business Innovation as Policy Disruption: From the Model T to Airbnb. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70(5), 1561-1626. Celata, F. (2017). La "Airbnbificazione" dellecitt?: glieffetti a Roma tracentro e periferia (The "Airbnbification" of cities: the effects in Rome between centre and periphery). www.researchgate.net/publication/334050681_La_Airbnbificazione_delle_citta_gli_effetti_a_Roma_tra_centro_e_periferia. Accessed: 29 May 2020. Cerruti, E. and Russo, G. (2018). Le Start-up innovative e tecnologiche in Piemonte (The high-tech and innovative start-ups in Piedmont). www.to.camcom.it/sites/default/files/promozione-territorio/Osservatorio_SUI_edizione_2018.pdf. Accessed: 29 May 2020. Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the Firm. Economica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x d'Ippolito, G. (2018). Sharing economy: l'esperienzaitalianadella XVII legislaturaalla luce degliorientamentieuropei (Shating economy: the Italian experience of the XVII legislature in light of the European orientations). MediaLaws, 2, 298-317. Gagliardi, A. and Mobili, M. (2020, January 19). Monopattini elettrici, sanzioni fino a 800 euro e nuovi limiti di velocit? (Electric kick-scooters, fines up to 800 EUR and new speed limits). Il Sole 24 ore. www.ilsole24ore.com/art/monopattini-elettrici-sanzioni-fino-800-euro-e-nuovi-limiti-velocita-ACi4WwCB. Accessed: 29 May 2020. Giorgiantonio, C. and Rizzica, L. (2018). Il lavoro nella gig economy. Evidenze dal mercato del food delivery in Italia (Work in the gig economy: Evidence from the food delivery market in Italy). www.researchgate.net/publication/330245397_Il_lavoro_nella_gig_economy_Evidenze_dal_mercato_del_food_delivery_in_Italia. Accessed: 29 May 2020. Grasseni, C. (2014). Seeds of trust. Alternative food networks in Italy. Journal of Political Ecology, 21(1), 178-192. Mainieri, M. (2018). Mappaturadellepiattaforme collaborative 2017 (2017 mapping of collaborative platforms). http://collaboriamo.org/pubblicazioni-email/. Accessed: 29 May 2020. Mainieri, M. and Pais, I. (2017). Sharing economy: la mappatura delle piattaforme italiane 2016 (Sharing economy: the 2016 mapping of Italian platforms). http://collaboriamo.org/pubblicazioni-email/. Accessed: 29 May 2020. Picascia, S., Romano, A., Teobaldi, M. (2017). The airification of cities: making sense of the impact of peer-to-peer short-term letting on urban functions and economy. Paper presented at the Annual Congress of the Association of the European Schools of Planning, Lisbon, 11-14 July 2017. Ruffilli, B. (2018, November 26). CarlesLLoret: "Uber riparte da Torino. Daremo la nostra app ai taxi" (CarlesLloret: "Uber starts again from Turin: we will give our app to taxi). La Stampa. www.lastampa.it/topnews/tempi-moderni/2018/11/26/news/carles-lloret-uber-riparte-da-torino-daremo-la-nostra-app-ai-taxi-1.34063027. Accessed: 29 May 2020. Vallas, S.P. and Schor, J.B. (2020). What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857. Williamson, O.E. (1973). Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 316-325. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/110236 |