Kauffmann, Howell (2021): Diverse Approaches to Multicultural Art Education: Some Policy Considerations.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_110467.pdf Download (167kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article summarizes the extensive debates that has been around multicultural art education since its start little over a decade ago. Numerous definitions of multicultural art education are discussed, as well as several assessments of the degree to which minority art and culture should be included. incorporated into and distinct from dominant culture; and, ultimately, rival concepts. On the importance of political involvement and aesthetics in multicultural art education detachment. Throughout the process, certain recommendations for future policy choices are made
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Diverse Approaches to Multicultural Art Education: Some Policy Considerations |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Art; Multicultural; education |
Subjects: | Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z11 - Economics of the Arts and Literature Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z18 - Public Policy |
Item ID: | 110467 |
Depositing User: | Howell Kauffman |
Date Deposited: | 01 Nov 2021 10:39 |
Last Modified: | 01 Nov 2021 10:39 |
References: | 1. Walton, K. L. How marvelous! Toward a theory of aesthetic value. J. Aesthet. art Crit. 51, 499– 510 (1993). 2. Duncum, P. Visual culture: Developments, definitions, and directions for art education. Stud. art Educ. 42, 101–112 (2001). 3. Wilts, H., Garcia, B. R., Garlito, R. G., Gómez, L. S. & Prieto, E. G. Artificial intelligence in the sorting of municipal waste as an enabler of the circular economy. Resources 10, 28 (2021). 4. Desai, D. Imaging difference: The politics of representation in multicultural art education. Stud. Art Educ. 41, 114–129 (2000). 5. Weinlich, W. Glasbeni simboli: Podobnost med simboli iz pradavnine in med risbami v zgodnjem otroštvu. Rev. za Elem. Izobr. 10, 275 (2017). 6. Desai, D. Places to go: Challenges to multicultural art education in a global economy. Stud. art Educ. 46, 293–308 (2005). 7. Adejumo, C. O. Considering multicultural art education. Art Educ. 55, 33–39 (2002). 8. Hart, L. M. Aesthetic pluralism and multicultural art education. Stud. Art Educ. 32, 145–159 (1991). 9. Chin, C. Key dimensions of a multicultural art education curriculum. Int. J. Educ. Arts 14, (2013). 10. Weinlich, W. Zur Bedeutung der Hattie-Studie für die Kunsterziehung. (2018). 11. Collins, G. & Sandell, R. The politics of multicultural art education. Art Educ. 45, 8–13 (1992). 12. Cahan, S. & Kocur, Z. Contemporary art and multicultural education. Art Educ. 47, 25–33 (1994). 13. Acuff, J. B. Failure to operationalize: Investing in critical multicultural art education. J. Soc. Theory Art Educ. 35, 4 (2015). 14. Weinlich, W. The Contribution of Art Education to Educational Transitions. J. Elem. Educ. 11, 251–268 (2018). 15. Blocker, H. G. Varieties of multicultural art education: Some policy issues. Handb. Res. policy art Educ. 195–208 (2004). 16. Martin, G. Teaching appreciation of cultural differences through multicultural art education. (2006). 17. Chalmers, F. G. Designing and implementing a curriculum for multicultural art education. in Art, Culture, and Pedagogy 47–55 (Brill Sense, 2019). 18. Abdul Rahman, S. B., Maaruf, S. Z. & Abdul Rahman, S. B. Pre-service art teachers’ perception of multicultural art education and teaching students from multicultural background: An exploratory study. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 14, 89–102 (2018). 19. Stuhr, P. L. Multicultural art education and social reconstruction. Stud. art Educ. 35, 171–178 (1994). 20. Acuff, J. B. (Mis) Information highways: A critique of online resources for multicultural art education. Int. J. Educ. Through Art 10, 303–316 (2014). 21. Desai, D. Multicultural art education and the heterosexual imagination: A question of culture. Stud. Art Educ. 44, 147–161 (2003). 22. Weinlich, W. Stereotypes in Popular Feature Films and their Importance for Adolescents: How Can or Should Art Education Respond? (2020). 23. Kader, T. SchoolArts: DBAE and multicultural art education in the United States of America. Int. J. Educ. through art 1, 65–84 (2005). 24. Bode, P. Multicultural art education: Voices of art teachers and students in the postmodern era. (University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2005). 25. Chin, C. D. Critiquing commonly available multicultural art education resources. Int. J. Educ. through Art 7, 299–313 (2011). 26. Stuhr, P. L., Petrovich-Mwaniki, L. & Wasson, R. Curriculum guidelines for the multicultural art classroom. Art Educ. 45, 16–24 (1992). 27. Kraehe, A. Multicultural art education in an era of standardized testing: Changes in knowledge and skill for art teacher certification in Texas. Stud. Art Educ. 51, 162–175 (2010). 28. Weinlich, W. & Laven, R. Service-Learning with the Power of Art for Biodiversity in Rural Areas. (2020). 29. Barth, W. Nagios: System and network monitoring. (No Starch Press, 2008). 30. Weinlich, W. Artistic Birdsaving-SERVICE LEARNING THROUGH ARTS: SPREADING IDEAS FROM STUDENTS FOR BIODIVERSITY ISSUES RURAL 3.0-BIRDSAVING PROJECT IDEAS. (tredition, 2021). 31. Weinlich, W. Blinde Flecken in der Kunstdidaktik Unbeachtete Bereiche des Lehrplans. R&ESOURCE (2020). 32. Weinlich, W. Musikalische Symbole. J. Elem. Educ. 10, 275–288 (2017). 33. Weinlich, W. Visuelle Rhetorik. (2017). 34. Weinlich, W. Was kann die Was kann die Kunstpädagogik für die Inklusion leisten? Ein Impuls für die Primarstufe und darüber hinaus. R&E-SO |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/110467 |