Bonifazi, Alessandro and Rega, Carlo and Torre, Carmelo Maria (2008): Evaluation and the environmental democracy of cities: Strategic Environmental Assessment of urban plans in Italy.
Download (142kB) | Preview
Cities stand up as a major concern for environmental governance and democracy, and an ideal target for theoretical investigations and practical innovations alike. Our work is concerned with reconstructing the links between democracy and the environment, by targeting urban governance and tapping into the institutional practices of Urban Planning and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). SEA is a major policy tool, and its interplay with planning unravels key issues in both urban governance and environmental democracy, including coping with fundamental risks, voicing non-human agents, managing commons, addressing environmental justice. The observations we present in this paper rest on two parallel approaches. First, we carried out a content review of 12 SEA reports concerning urban plans in Italy. Second, we were involved in two case studies concerning urban planning and SEA in the towns of Monopoli and Magenta. We point to some key reflections with the aim of opening up the discussion. Participation often languishes in institutional arenas, yet it thrives in other forms that affect decision-making. Negotiation around individual planning processes should be framed in the general governance arrangements that are constantly reshaped through interactions among fluid trans-organizational networks. Legally binding measures have an ambivalent relation with environmental governance strategies, and they are handled with difficulty by deliberative planning approaches. In mainstreaming new policy tools (such as SEA), procedural aspects are usually stressed, whereas a focus on process and desired outcomes could foster, respectively, capacity building and salience.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Evaluation and the environmental democracy of cities: Strategic Environmental Assessment of urban plans in Italy.|
|Keywords:||Governance, Evaluation of Plans|
|Subjects:||Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects
|Depositing User:||Carmelo Maria Torre|
|Date Deposited:||13. Oct 2008 00:00|
|Last Modified:||08. May 2015 00:51|
Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planning 35: 216-224.
Bauler, Tom, Alessandro Bonifazi and Carmelo M. Torre. (forthcoming). Is there room for equity in the European Commission policy-making? An evaluation of selected Impact Assessment reports. In Khakee, Abdul, Angela D. Hull, Donald Miller, and J. Woltjer (eds.), New principles in planning evaluation. Aldershot (UK): Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Bobbio, Luigi. 2002. Le arene deliberative. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 3: 5-29 (in Italian).
Bonifazi, Alessandro and Carlo Rega. 2008. Strategic Environmental Assessment and the tangles of urban governance: sustainability, democracy and learning. Paper presented at symposium, Governance by Evaluation: Institutional Capacities and Learning for Sustainable Development, Easy-Eco Conference, Vienna, 11-14 March 2008.
Brown, A. L. and R. Thérivel. 2000. Principles to guide the development of Strategic Environmental Assessment methodology. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18 (3): 183–189.
Celino, Adele. 2003. Dall’idea progettuale alla proposta del Parco. In Francesco Selicato (edited by), Il Parco Agrario degli Ulivi secolari: la piana costiera tra Bari e Brindisi. Fasano (Italy): Schena Editore (in italian).
Chaker, A., K El-Fadl, L. Chamas and B. Hatjian. 2006. A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26 (1): 15–56.
Chelimsky, Eleonor. 1998. The role of experience in formulating theories of evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation 19 (1): 35-55.
Coaffee, Jon, and Patsy Healey. 2003. 'My Voice: My Place': Tracking Transformations in Urban Governance. Urban Studies 40 (10): 1979-1999.
Connelly, S. and T. Richardson. 2005. Value-driven SEA: time for an environmental justice perspective? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25 (4): 391-410. Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Barry Sadler (eds.). 2005. Strategic Environmental Assessment. A sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. London: Earthscan.
Dietz, S. and E. Neumayer. 2007. Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement. Ecological Economics 61 (4): 617-626.
Elster, Jon. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faludi, Andreas. 2007. Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society. European Planning Studies 15 (4): 567-583.
Fischer, Thomas B. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 (2): 155-170.
Fischer, Thomas B. and Kim Seaton. 2002. Strategic Environmental Assessment: Effective Planning Instrument or Lost Concept? Planning Practice and Research 17 (1): 31-44.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2004. Phronetic Planning Research: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. Planning Theory & Practice 5 (3): 283–306.
Fusco Girard, Luigi. 2006. Towards sustainable planning, Agenda 21, Habitat. In Alexander, E. R. (ed.), Evaluation in planning: evolution and prospects. Aldershot (UK): Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Harrington, W. and R. D. Morgenstern. 2004. Evaluating Regulatory Impact Analyses. Resources for the future: Discussion Paper 04–04. Retrieved 30 April, 2008 from http://www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-DP-04-04.pdf.
Healey, Patsy. 2006. Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies 14 (4): 525-546.
Hunold, Christian, and Iris Marion Young. 1998. Justice, Democracy, and Hazardous Siting. Political Studies 46 (1): 82-95.
IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment). 2002. SEA Performance criteria. Special Publication Series 1, Retrieved 30 April, 2008 from: http://www.iaia.org.
Irazabàl, Clara. 2005. City-making and urban governance in the Americas: Curitiba and Portland. Aldershot (UK): Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Khakee, Abdul. 2000. Reading plans as an exercise in evaluation. Evaluation 6 (2): 119-136.
Khakee, Abdul. 1998. Evaluation and Planning: inseparable concepts. Town Planning Review 69 (4): 359-374.
Lawrence, David P. 2000. Planning theories and environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20 (6): 607-625.
Lee, Norman and Colin Kirkpatrick. 2006. Evidence-based policy-making in Europe: an evaluation of European Commission integrated impact assessments. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 24 (1): 23-33.
Le Galès, Patrick. 1995. Du gouvernement des villes à la gouvernance urbaine. Revue Française de Science Politique 45 (1): 57-95.
Micelli, Ezio. 2002. Development Rights Markets to Manage Urban Plans in Italy. Urban Studies 39 (1): 141-154. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2007. Applying Strategic Environmental Assessment-Good Practice Guidance for Development Co-operation, Paris: OECD.
Pompilio, Marco. 2007. Gruppo di lavoro VAS e Governo del territorio: aggiornamento sulle attività svolte nel corso del 2007. Valutazione Ambientale 12: 99 (in Italian).
Pruetz, R. 1993. Putting transfer of development rights to work in California. Point Arena (USA): Solano Press.
Radaelli, Claudio. 2005. Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 924-943.
Rega, Carlo and Alessandro Bonifazi. 2007. Integration and salience in Strategic Environmental Assessment of urban plans in Italy: a metaevaluation of current practices’ effectiveness. Paper presented at symposium, Association of European Schools Of Planning (AESOP), Planning for the risk society-dealing with uncertainty, challenging the future, Naples, July 11-14, 2007.
Retief, Francois. 2007. A performance evaluation of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) processes within the South African context. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (1): 84-100.
Sadler, Barry. 1996. Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance. Report to the International Association for Impact Assessment and the Canadian Agency for Environmental Assessment. Canada: Minister of Supply and Services.
Sadler, Barry and Rob Verheem. 1996. Strategic Environmental Assessment 53: Status, Challenges and Future Directions. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (The Netherlands), and International Study of Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment.
Sandercock, Leonie. 2003. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities in the 21st Century. London and New York: Continuum. Scriven, Michael. 1991. Evaluation Thesaurus. Newbury Park: Sage.
Schön, Donald. 2002. From Technical Rationality to reflection-in-action. In Harrison, R., F. Reeve, A. Hanson, J. Clarke (eds.), Supporting lifelong learning (Vol. 1, Perspectives on learning). London and New York: Routledge.
Sheate, William, Suzan Dagg, Kelli O’Donnell, Jeremy Richardson, Ralf Aschemann, Juan Palerm and Ulla Steen. 2001. SEA and integration of the environment into strategic decision-making. Vol. 3, Case studies. Final report to the European Commission. DG XI, Contract no. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4. Retrieved 30 April, 2008 from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/sea-support.htm.
Stufflebeam, D. L. 2000. The Methodology of Metaevaluation as Reflected in Metaevaluations by the Western Michigan University. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 14 (1) 95-125.
Tzoumis, K. 2007. Comparing the quality of draft environmental impact statements by agencies in the United States since 1998 to 2004. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27: 26–40.
United Nations (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division). 2008. World Urbanization Prospects: the 2007 revision (executive summary). New York: United Nations.
Van Hinte, T., T. I. Gunton and J. C. DAY. 2007. Evaluation of the assessment process for major projects: a case study of oil and gas pipelines in Canada. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 25(2): 123-137.