Analyzing the Potential Impact of Indirect Tax Reforms on Poverty with Limited Data: Niger

Sehili, Saloua and Wodon, Quentin (2008): Analyzing the Potential Impact of Indirect Tax Reforms on Poverty with Limited Data: Niger. Published in: Public Finance for Poverty Reduction: Concepts and Case Studies from Africa and Latin America (edited by Blanca Moreno-Dodson and Quentin Wodon, published in World Bank Directions in Development) (January 2008): pp. 345-370.

Abstract

Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa are confronted with the need to raise tax revenues in order to be able to provide a range of services to their populations. Yet taxes and other government revenues as a proportion of GDP are lowest in the poorest countries that need to expand their services the most. In addition, because of high level of informality in their economies, very-low-income countries obtain a large share of tax revenues through consumption taxes which tend to be more regressive than taxes on incomes levied in richer countries. Such a situation poses a difficult dilemma. Very-low-income countries are trying to increase their tax revenues to provide better services to their populations in need, but at the same time a substantial part of the burden of increased taxation may fall on the poor. Furthermore, because the poor in very-low-income countries are often extremely poor, even small increases in the price of the goods they consume related to an increase in tax rates on those goods may have important negative implications for the households’ ability to meet their basic needs. This implies that government must be especially careful when raising taxes in order to provide social services. The type of household survey-based analysis that can be conducted to inform governments in this area is illustrated in this paper with a case study on Niger.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Indirect taxes; social services; poverty; Niger
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis

References

Ajwad, Mohamed Ishan, and Quentin Wodon. 2007. “Do Local Governments Maximize Access Rates to Public Services across Areas? A Test Based on Marginal Benefit Incidence Analysis.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 47: 242–60.

Coady, David, Margaret Grosh, and John Hoddinott. 2004. “Targeting Outcomes Redux.”World Bank Research Observer 19 (1): 61–85.

Demery, Lionel. 2003. “Analyzing the Incidence of Public Spending.” In The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution: Evaluation Techniques and Tools, ed. François Bourguignon and Luis A. Pereira da Silva, 41–68.Washington, DC: World Bank.

Grosh, Margaret. 1994. Administering Targeted Social Programs in Latin America: From Platitudes to Practice.Washington, DC: World Bank.

Komives, Kristin,V. Foster, J. Halpern, Q.Wodon, and R. Abdullah. 2005.Water, Electricity, and the Poor: Who Benefits from Utility Subsidies?Washington, DC: World Bank.

Lambert, Peter J. 1993. “Evaluating Impact Effects of Tax Reforms.” Journal of Economic Surveys 7: 205–42.

Lanjouw, Peter, and Martin Ravallion. 1999. “Benefit Incidence, Public Spending Reforms, and the Timing of Program Capture.”World Bank Economic Review 13 (2): 257–73.

Makdissi, Paul, and Quentin Wodon. 2002. “Consumption Dominance Curves: Testing for the Impact of Indirect Tax Reforms on Poverty.” Economics Letters 75 (2): 227–35.

Subbarao, Kalanidhi, A. Bonnerjee, J. Braithwaite, S. Carvalho, K. Ezemenari, C. Graham, and A. Thompson. 1997. Safety Net Programs and Poverty Reduction: Lessons from Cross-Country Experience.Washington, DC:World Bank.

Wodon, Quentin, and Xiao Ye. 2006. “Benefit Incidence Analysis Adjusted for Needs and Costs: Assessing the Equity of Public Education Spending in Sierra Leone.”World Bank,Washington, DC.

Yitzhaki, Shlomo, and Jeffrey D. Lewis. 1996. “Guidelines on Searching for a Dalton-Improving Tax Reform: An Illustration with Data from Indonesia.” World Bank Economic Review 10: 541–62.

Yitzhaki, Shlomo, and Joel Slemrod. 1991. “Welfare Dominance: An Application to Commodity Taxation.” American Economic Review 81: 480–96.

Yitzhaki, Shlomo, and Wayne Thirsk. 1990. “Welfare Dominance and the Design of Excise Taxation in the Côte d’Ivoire.” Journal of Development Economics 33: 1–18.