Institutions Matter differently depending on the Ownership Types of Firms: Interacting Effects on Firm Productivity in China

Lee, Hyuntai and Lee, Keun (2018): Institutions Matter differently depending on the Ownership Types of Firms: Interacting Effects on Firm Productivity in China. Published in: Singapore Economic Review No. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590818500224 (April 2018)

Abstract

Ownership and institutions are regarded as key determinants of firm performance. Using data of Chinese firms from 1998 to 2009, this study tests the separate and interacting effects of ownership and institutions. The divergent performance of firms can be explained from the heterogeneous ownership context, as confirmed by the literature, and through variations in the way that firms of different ownership types use and exploit institutions. Privately owned firms tend to exploit considerably larger benefits from the same institutions in comparison with foreign-owned (FEs) or state-owned enterprise (SOEs). FEs or SOEs also obtain some benefits; however, these benefits are significantly smaller than those obtained by private enterprises (PEs). Results can be attributed to the differences in the aims and incentives of firms with diverse ownership types. While the initial productivity of PEs may be lower than that of FEs at the low levels of institutional development, , PEs are shown to eventually catch up with FEs because institutions develop further over time to be better exploited by PEs than Fes. Hence, any policy design should consider this coevolving nature of institutions and firm ownership; whereas private firms cannot prosper without sound institutions, institutional development may be useless unless there are private firms that can benefit from this institutional development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: firm productivity; institutions; ownership; Chinese economy; coevolution; private firms, foreign-owned firms
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope; P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P31 - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions

References

Bai C-E, Lu J, Tao Z. (2009). How does privatization work in China? Journal of Comparative Economics, 37, 453-470.

Baptista, R., and Swann, G. M. P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(6), 525–540

Baum, C. F. (2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. Stata press.

Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., and Zhang, Y. (2012). Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics, 97(2), 339–351.

Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., and Zhang, Y. (2014). Challenges of working with the Chinese NBS firm-level data. China Economic Review, 30, 339-352.

Cantwell, J. (2009). Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 35–41.

Chan, C. M., Makino, S., and Isobe, T. (2010). Does sub-national region matter? Foreign affiliate performance in the United States and China. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1226–1243.

Coase, R. H. (1960). Problem of social cost, the. JL & econ., 3, 1.

Chang, S. J. (2013). Multinational firms in China: Entry strategies, competition, and firm performance. OUP Oxford . Chang S-J and Wu B. (2009). Post-liberalization industry shakeout in China, 1998–2006. Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Cuervo, A. and Villalonga B. (2000). Explaining the variance in the performance effects of privatization. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 581-590.

Demsetz, Harold. (1988). The theory of the firm revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(1), 141-161.

Dollar, D., Hallward-Driemeier, M., and Mengistae, T. (2005). Investment climate and firm performance in developing economies. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(1), 1-31.

Dollar, D., and Wei. S. J. (2007). Das (Wasted) Kapital: Firm Ownership and Investment Efficiency in China, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13103.

Dougherty, S., Herd, R., and He, P. (2007). Has a private sector emerged in China's industry? Evidence from a quarter of a million Chinese firms. China Economic Review, 18, 309–334.

Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 45–66.

Driffield, N., Munday, M., and Roberts, A. (2002). Foreign direct investment, transactions linkages, and the performance of the domestic sector. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9(3), 335-351.

Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., and Svejnar, J. (2009). The effects of privatization and ownership in transition economies. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(3), 699-728.

Fan, G., Wang, X., and Zhu, H. (2011). NERI Index of Marketization of China’s Provinces 2011 Report, Economics Science Press (in Chinese).

Graham, E.M., Wada, E. (2001). In: Drysdale, Peter (Ed.), Foreign Direct Investment in China: Effects on Growth and Economic Performance, Achieving High Growth: Experience of Transition Economies in East Asia. Oxford University Press.

He, C. F. (2003). Location of foreign manufacturers in China: Agglomeration economies and country of origin effects. Papers in Regional Science, 82(3), 351-372

Javorcik, B. S. (2004). The Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Evidence from Transition Economies. European Economic Review, 48(1), 39–62.

Jin, F., Lee, K. and Kim, Y. K., (2008), Changing Engines of Growth in China: From Exports, FDI and Marketization to Innovation and Exports, China and World Economy, 16, 31-49.

Jin, F., and Lee, K. (2017). Dynamics of the growth–inequality nexus in China: roles of surplus labor, openness, education, and technical change in province-panel analysis. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20(1), 1-25.

Khanna, T., and Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–54.

Kornai, Janos. (1980). Economics of shortage. North Holland.

Lee, K., and Temesgen, T. (2009). What makes firms grow in developing countries? An extension of the resource-based theory of firm growth and empirical analysis. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 2(3), 139-172.

Lee, Hyun-Tai. (2016). Causes of the Changing Performance of Firms with Diverse Types of Ownerships in China. Seoul Journal of Economics, 29(1), 95-112.

Li, K., Yue, H., and Zhao, L. (2009). Ownership, institutions, and capital structure: Evidence from China. Journal of comparative economics 37(3), 471-490.

Li, H., Yang, Z., Yao, X., Zhang, H., and Zhang, J. (2012). Entrepreneurship, private economy and growth: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(4), 948-961.

Lin, J. Y. (2011). Demystifying the Chinese economy. Cambridge University Press,

Ma, X., Tong, T. W., and Fitza, M. (2013). How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance and quest; Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 66-87.

Ma, X., and Delios, A. (2010). Host country headquarters and an MNE’s subsequent within-country diversifications. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 517–525.

Mathews, J. (2002). Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 467-488.

Meyer, K. E., and Nguyen, H. V. (2005). Foreign Investment Strategies and Sub‐national Institutions in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of management studies, 42(1), 63-93.

Nachum L. (2000). Economic geography and the location of TNCs: financial and professional service FDI to the USA. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 367–385.

Naughton, Barry. (2007). The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. MIT press.

Nee, V., and Matthews, R. (1996). Market transition and societal transformation in reforming state socialism. Annual Review of sociology, 22(1), 401-435.

Penrose, E.T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Basil Blackwell.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.

Ramamurti, R. (1987). Performance evaluation of state-owned enterprises in theory and practice. Management Science, 33(7), 876-893.

Sachs, J. D., and Woo, W. T. (2001). Understanding China's economic performance. The Journal of Policy Reform, 4(1), 1-50.

Seabra, F., and Flach, L. (2005). Foreign direct investment and profit outflows: a causality analysis for the Brazilian economy. Economics Bulletin, 6(1), 1-15.

Wan, W. P., and Hoskisson, R. E. (2003). Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 27-45.

Wei, Y., Liu, X., Parker, D., and Vaidya, K. (1999). The regional distribution of foreign direct investment in China. Regional studies, 33(9), 857-867.

Wei, Z., Xie, F., and Zhang, S. (2005). Ownership structure and firm value in China's privatized firms: 1991–2001. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 40(01), 87-108.

Xia, F., and Walker, G. (2015). How much does owner type matter for firm performance? Manufacturing firms in China 1998–2007. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 576-585.

Xu, D., Pan, Y., Wu, C., and Yim, B. (2006). Performance of domestic and foreign-invested enterprises in China. Journal of World Business, 41(3), 261-274.