Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Persistence of High Growth Firms: A 'Broken Clock' Critique

Coad, Alex and Srhoj, Stjepan (2021): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Persistence of High Growth Firms: A 'Broken Clock' Critique.

Abstract

The Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EE) approach makes specific predictions regarding how EE inputs are converted into high-growth firms (HGFs) as an output. A simulation model draws out our hypothesis of regional persistence in HGF shares. Based on intuitions that EEs are persistent, we investigate whether regional HGF shares are persistent, using census data for 2 European countries taken separately (Croatia for 2004-2019, and Slovenia for 2008-2014). Overall, there is no clear persistence in regional HGF shares - regions with large HGF shares in one period are not necessarily likely to have large HGF shares in the following period. This is a puzzle for EE theory. In fact, there seems to be more persistence in industry-level HGF shares than for regional HGF shares. We formulate a ‘broken clock’ critique - just as a broken clock is correct twice a day, EE recommendations may sometimes be correct, but are fundamentally flawed as long as time-changing outcomes (HGF shares) are predicted using time-invariant variables (such as local universities, institutions and infrastructure).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: High-Growth Firms, Persistence, Regional Persistence; Entrepreneurial Ecosystems; Clusters; Sectoral Systems of Innovation
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods; L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction > L78 - Government Policy; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy

References

Abootorabi, H., Wiklund, J., Johnson, A. R., & Miller, C. D. (2021). A holistic approach to the evolution of an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploratory study of academic spin-offs. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), 106143.

Acs, Z.J., Autio, E., Szerb, L., 2014. National Systems of Entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43, 476–494.

Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2018). Unicorns, gazelles, and other distractions on the way to understanding real entrepreneurship in the United States. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(4), 458-472.

Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Sheer, L. (2021). Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. American Economic Review, 111(3), 871-98.

Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097-1108.

Bosma, N., Content, J., Sanders, M., Stam, E., (2018). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe. Small Business Economics 51, 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0012-x

Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. Chapter 6, pages 130-156 in: Edquist, C (Editor), Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. Pinter: London, UK.

Brown, R., & Mawson, S. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and public policy in action: a critique of the latest industrial policy blockbuster. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(3), 347-368.

Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S. O., Hölzl, W., Johansson, D., & Nightingale, P. (2014). High-growth firms: introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 91-112.

Coad, A., & Srhoj, S. (2020). Catching Gazelles with a Lasso: Big data techniques for the prediction of high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 55(3), 541-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00203-3

Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475–491.

Daunfeldt S.-O., Halvarsson D., (2015). Are high-growth firms one-hit wonders? Evidence from Sweden. Small Business Economics 44, 361-383.

Daunfeldt, S. O., Johansson, D., & Halvarsson, D. (2015). Using the Eurostat-OECD definition of high-growth firms: a cautionary note. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 4(1), 50-56.

Demir, R., Wennberg, K., & McKelvie, A. (2017). The strategic management of high-growth firms: a review and theoretical conceptualization. Long Range Planning, 50(4), 431-456.

Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 495–518.

Fallick, B., Fleischman, C. A., and Rebitzer, J. B. (2006). Job-hopping in Silicon Valley: some evidence concerning the microfoundations of a high-technology cluster. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), 472–481.

Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861-891.

Flachenecker, F., Gavigan, J., P., Goenaga, X., Pasi, G., Preziosi, N., Stamenov, B., & Testa, G. (2020). High Growth Enterprises: demographics, financing & policy measures. JRC Technical Report. Joint Research Centre. Brussels, Belgium. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/high-growth-enterprises-demographics-finance-policy-measures

Freeman, C (1995). The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19, 5-24.

Friesenbichler, K., & Hölzl, W. (2020). High-growth firm shares in Austrian regions: the role of economic structures. Regional Studies, 54(11), 1585-1595.

Fritsch, M. (2001). Co-operation in regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 35(4), 297–307

Fritsch M., Wyrwich M., (2014) The Long Persistence of Regional Levels of Entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925–2005, Regional Studies, 48:6, 955-973, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.816414

Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research policy, 31(6), 899-933.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.

Gilson, R. (1999). The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete. New York University Law Review 74 (3), 575-629.

Grover Goswami A., Medvedev D., Olafsen E. (2019). High-Growth Firms: Facts, Fiction, and Policy Options for Emerging Economies. World Bank. Washington, DC.

Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: a review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375-423.

Henrekson M, Johansson D (2010). Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics 35:227–244.

Henrekson, M., Johansson, D. and Stenkula, M. (2010). Taxation, Labor Market Policy and High-Impact Entrepreneurship, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 10(3): 275-296.

Hölzl W., (2014). Persistence, survival, and growth: a closer look at 20 years of fast-growing firms in Austria. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23 (1), 199–231.

Isenberg, D., & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering scaleup ecosystems for regional economic growth (innovations case narrative: Manizales-Mas and Scale Up Milwaukee). Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 11(1-2), 60-79.

Lafuente, E., Ács, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2021). A composite indicator analysis for optimizing entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 104379.

Leendertse, J., Schrijvers, M., & Stam, E. (2021). Measure twice, cut once: Entrepreneurial ecosystem metrics. Research Policy, 104336.

Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.) 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter.

Malecki, E. J. (2018). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography compass, 12(3), e12359. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12359

Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research policy, 31(2), 247-264.

Moretti, E. (2021). The effect of high-tech clusters on the productivity of top inventors. American Economic Review, 111(10), 3328-75.

Nightingale P., Coad A., (2014). “Muppets and Gazelles: Ideological and Methodological Biases in Entrepreneurship Research.” Industrial and Corporate Change 23 (1), 113–143.

North, D., (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.

Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2013). Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: Theory, methodology and evidence. Research Policy, 42(5), 1015-1038.

Rocha, A., Brown, R., & Mawson, S. (2021). Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 50(9), 104317.

Shumway, R. H., & Stoffer, D. S. (2017). Time Series Analysis and Its Applications: With R Examples. 4th Edition. Springer Verlag.

Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72.

Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168.

Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.

Stam, E., & Van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 809-832.

Vedula, S., Kim, P.H., 2019. Gimme shelter or fade away: the impact of regional entrepreneurial ecosystem quality on venture survival. Industrial and Corporate Change 28, 827–854. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz032.