Miglo, Anton (2022): Comparing Crowdfunding Theory and Practice: The Case of Technology Firms in England.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_111349.pdf Download (720kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article analyzes crowdfunding campaigns of technology firms in England. We compare the predictions of crowdfunding theories with empirical evidence. We are particularly focused on factors of campaign success related to indirect signalling (such as the choice of campaign target) by founders that have mixed evidence in existing research as opposed to direct signalling (eg. the number of updates by founders). We have found that the campaign target has U-shape effect on success of campaign. For example, the probability of success increases if the threshold value is neither very small or significantly large. This is consistent with the spirit of some theoretical research on crowdfunding. We also provide an overview of literature related to informational problems in crowdfunding, highlight gaps and controversial areas and provide some suggestions for future research.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Comparing Crowdfunding Theory and Practice: The Case of Technology Firms in England |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | crowdfunding, reward-based crowdfunding, crowdfunding in technology sector, digital entrepreneurship, information asymmetry, signalling, factors of crowdfunding success, campaign target |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 111349 |
Depositing User: | Dr Anton Miglo |
Date Deposited: | 03 Jan 2022 04:59 |
Last Modified: | 03 Jan 2022 04:59 |
References: | Agrawal, A., C. Catalini, and A. Goldfarb. 2010. The Geography of Crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper No. 16820. 10.2139/ssrn.1692661 Ahlers G, Cumming D, Guenther C, Schweizer D (2015) Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39(4): 955-980. Åstebro, T., Martha Lucçia Manrique Sierra, S. Lovo and Nir Vulkan. “Herding in Equity Crowdfunding.” Social Science Research Network (2019): n. pag. Beck, T. H. L., Demirgüc-Kunt, A., and V. Maksimovic. (2008). Financing patterns around the world: Are small firms different? Journal of Financial Economics 89(3): 467-487. Belleflamme P, Omrani N, Peitz M (2015) The Economics of Crowdfunding Platforms Information Economics and Policy 33(C):11-28. Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2014) Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd. Journal of Business Venturing 29(5): 585-609. Block J, Hornuf L, Moritz A (2018) Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? Small Business Economics 50: 3–27. Chakraborty S, Swinney R (2019) Signalling to the Crowd: Private Quality Information and Rewards-Based Crowdfunding. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management Forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2885457. Chan CR, Parhankangas A, Sahaym A, Oo P (2020) Bellwether and the herd? Unpacking the u-shaped relationship between prior funding and subsequent contributions in reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing 35(2), 105934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.04.002 Chemla G, Tinn K (2020) Learning Through Crowdfunding, Management Science 66(5): 1783-2290. Cong Lin William, Yizhou Xiao 2018. Up-Cascaded Wisdom of the Crowd∗ . https://financetheory.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-70ba24ead09917a027e3e47d3324b973/2018/02/UCWC-Cong-Xiao-2018.pdf Cordova A, Dolci J, Gianfrate G (2015) The Determinants of Crowdfunding Success: Evidence from Technology Projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 181(11): 115-124. Courtney C, Dutta S, Li Y (2017) Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 41(2): 265-290. Paolo Crosetto & Tobias Regner, 2014. "Crowdfunding: Determinants of success and funding dynamics," Jena Economic Research Papers 2014-035, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena. Cumming D, Leboeuf G, Schwienbacher A (2019) Crowdfunding Models: Keep-it-All versus All or Nothing. Financial Management, forthcoming. Davies W, Giovannetti E (2018) Signalling experience & reciprocity to temper asymmetric information in crowdfunding evidence from 10,000 projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 133: 118-131. Desjardins J. July 14, 2016. Weird Crowdfunding Campaigns That Failed Spectacularly. http://www.visualcapitalist.com/19-weird-crowdfundingcampaigns-failed/ Grinblatt, Mark, Titman, Sheridan . Financial Markets & Corporate Strategy 2nd (second) Edition published by McGraw-Hill Higher Education (2001) Paperback Hall, B. 2009. The financing of innovative firms, EIB papers 14 (2): 8-29. Hildebrand T, Puri M, Rocholl J (2016) Adverse Incentives in Crowdfunding. Management Science 63(3): 587-608. Hornuf Lars Matthias Schmitt Eliza Stenzhorn. Equity crowdfunding in Germany and the United Kingdom: Follow‐up funding and firm failure. 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12260 Katona, V.. “Role and positioning of reward based crowdfunding in the funding of technological innovation projects – viewpoint of entrepreneurial financing experts.” (2019). Jin-Hyuk Kim Peter W. Newberry Calvin Qiu An Empirical Analysis of a Crowdfunding Platform. January 2015 SSRN Electronic Journal DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2672075 Kleinert S, Volkmann C, Grünhagen M (2020) Third-party Signals in Equity Crowdfunding: the Role of Prior Financing. Small Business Economics 54: 341—365. Mach, T. L. (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington DC, USA) , 2014,The Role of Credit Access in Firm Sustainability: A Comparison of the 1998 and 2003 Surveys of Small Business Finances IRE Vol 12: Issue 4 Pages 141-162 Miglo A, Miglo V (2019) Market Imperfections and Crowdfunding. Small Business Economics Journal 53(1): 51-79. Miglo A (2020a) Crowdfunding in a Competitive Environment. J. Risk Financial Manag 13: 39. Miglo A. (2020b). Financing of Entrepreneurial Firms in Canada: Some Patterns. Administrative Sciences; 10(3):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030050 Miglo, A. (2021). Crowdfunding under market feedback, asymmetric information and overconfident entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 11(4), [2019018]. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2019-0018 Mollick E (2014) The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Venturing 29(1): 1-16. Petruzzelli M, Natalicchio A, Panniello U, Roma P (2019) Understanding the crowdfunding phenomenon and its implications for sustainability. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 141: 138-148. Piva E, Rossi-Lamastra C (2018) Human capital signals and entrepreneurs’ success in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics 51: 667–686. Sayedi A, Baghaie M (2017) Crowdfunding as a Marketing Tool (March 20, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2938183. Strausz R (2017) Crowdfunding, Demand Uncertainty, And Moral Hazard - a Mechanism Design Approach. American Economic Review 107(6): 1430-76. Arnout van de Rijt Soong Moon Kang Michael Restivo Akshay Patil. Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics. April 2014 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(19). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1316836111 Vismara S (2016) Equity Retention and Social Network Theory in Equity Crowdfunding. Small Business Economics 46(4): 579--590. Wilson, K. E. 2015. Policy Lessons from Financing Innovative Firms. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 24, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js03z8zrh9p-en Juanjuan Zhang Peng Liu Rational Herding in Microloan Markets. May 2012 Management Science 58(5):892-912. DOI: 10.2307/41499528 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/111349 |