Gain, Hemant (2022): Risk Management Practice Adopted in Road Construction Project. Published in: International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS) , Vol. 7, No. 1 (21 January 2022): pp. 21-36.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112055.pdf Download (481kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112055.pdf Download (481kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purpose: Zero risk construction is only a dream not reality as there is nothing certainity in the real world and scientists are only capable of coverting the same into risk with high level data science. The practice of risk management is an attempt to highlight risk elements with a case of urban road construction in Sindhupalchowk district, Province 3, Nepal. Design/Methodology/Approach: The 5-point Likert scale questionnaire survey was done to collect the primary data. Risk Management Practice is documented based on survey response in percentage through charts and graphs. Field visit were done for visual assessment of the construction procedure along with key informant interview and Secondary data of Detail Project Reports, Design and Drawings were effectively analyzed. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the reliability and triangulations were done for validity. Findings/Result: The results from this research indicates that contractor’s organization are averagely aware with a mean score of 3.30 about Risk Management Practice and averagely practicing risk management formally with mean score of 2.83. They are averagely analyzing risk management techniques with mean score of 3.07. Mean score is slightly higher based on client’s perspective with score for awareness being 3.93 and score for risk management being practiced formally is 3.13. Risk analysis score based on client’s management is 3.40. Mostly adopted technique of risk identification is monitoring and evaluation report of similar past projects and direct judgment is widely used technique for risk assessment of road construction projects at Sindhupalchowk district based on both client’s and contractor’s perspective. Risk response strategy based on contractor’s perspective is monitoring the risk and preparing contingency plan whereas that for client is transfer of risk. Originality/Value: It is action research which is significant for professionals to understand the practices of risk management being adopted by Nepalese Contractors in hilly region of Nepal.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Risk Management Practice Adopted in Road Construction Project |
English Title: | Risk Management Practice Adopted in Road Construction Project |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Risk, Practice, Identification, Assessment, Response |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being |
Item ID: | 112055 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Sreeramana Aithal |
Date Deposited: | 21 Feb 2022 05:01 |
Last Modified: | 18 Nov 2024 21:52 |
References: | [1] Petrovic, D. (2017). Risk Management in Construction Projects–A Knowledge Management Perspective from Swedish Contractors. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1150372/FULLTEXT01.pdf [2] Project Management Institute PMI (2017). Project management Body of Knowledge, PMI, 6th Edition. Available at: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/PMBOK. [3] Aleshin, A. (2001). Risk management of international projects in Russia. International Journal of Project Management (IJPM), 19(1), 207-222. Available at: https://www.infona.pl/resource. [4] Ahmed, M. & Dikbas, J. (2013). Applying a risk management process (RPM) to manage construction projects in Turkey, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey. Available at: https://www.iaeme.com/Journal_uploads/IJARET/V_6_ISSUE_1/IJARET_06_01_005.pdf [5] Smith, N. J., Merna, T., & Jobling, P. (2014). Managing Risk in Construction Projects (Third Edition). Wiley Blackwell. [6] Chitkara, K. K. (2011). Construction Project Management. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill. [7] Flanagan R. & Norman G. (1993). Flanagan, R. and Norman, G. (1993) Risk Management and Construction. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford. https://www.scirp.org/ (S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2521588. [8] Raz T. & Michael E. (2001). Use and benefits of tools for Project Risk Management. International Journal of Project Management (IJPM), 19(1), 9-17. [9] Mishra, A. & Malik, K. (2017). Factors and Impact of Risk Management Practice on Success of construction projects of Housing Developers, Kathmandu, Nepal. Internal Journal of Science: Basic and Applied Research, 36(1), 206-232. Available at: https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/8499. [10] Mhetre, K., Konnurb, B. & Landage, A. (2016). Risk Management in Construction Industry, International Journal of Engineering & Research (IJER), 5(1), 153-155. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/27583181/Risk_Management_in_Construction_Industry. [11] Gain, H. & Mishra, A. K. (2021). Impact of Risk Management Practice on Success of Road Construction Project. International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 7(54), 3467-3475. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.31576/smryj.1272. [12] Perera, B. A. K. S., Dhanasinghe, I. & Rameezdeen, R. (2009). Risk Management in Road Construction: The case of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 13(1), 87-102. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/Risk_Management_in_Road_Construction [13] Mishra A. K. & Adhikari R. (2019). Urban Road Construction Risk Management. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/Urban_Road_Construction_Risk_Management. [14] Shakya S. & Mishra A. K. (2019). Risk Assessment in Construction of Gautam Buddha International Airport. Journal of Advance Research in Construction and Urban Architecture, 4(1), 17-34. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/Risk_Assessment_of_Gauttam_Buddha_Airport [15] Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Works, 2073. Available at: https://dor.gov.np/home/publication/standard-specification-of-roads-and-bridges/standard-specifications-for-road-and-bridge-works-2-73 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112055 |