Dezhbakhsh, Hashem and Levy, Daniel (2022): Interpolation and Shock Persistence of Prewar U.S. Macroeconomic Time Series: A Reconsideration. Forthcoming in: Economics Letters , Vol. 213, (2022): pp. 1-7.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112493.pdf Download (408kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The U.S. prewar output series exhibit smaller shock-persistence than postwar-series. Some studies suggest that this may be due to linear interpolation used to generate missing prewar data. Monte Carlo simulations that support this view generate large standard-errors, making such inference imprecise. We assess analytically the effect of linear interpolation on a nonstationary process. We find that interpolation indeed reduces shock-persistence, but the interpolated series can still exhibit greater shock-persistence than a pure random walk. Moreover, linear interpolation makes the series periodically nonstationary, with parameters of the data generating process and the length of the interpolation time-segments affecting shock-persistence in conflicting ways.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Interpolation and Shock Persistence of Prewar U.S. Macroeconomic Time Series: A Reconsideration |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Linear Interpolation; Random Walk; Shock-Persistence; Nonstationary series; Periodic nonstationarity; Stationary series; Prewar US Time Series |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C01 - Econometrics C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E30 - General N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics ; Industrial Structure ; Growth ; Fluctuations > N10 - General, International, or Comparative |
Item ID: | 112493 |
Depositing User: | Daniel Levy |
Date Deposited: | 22 Mar 2022 03:10 |
Last Modified: | 22 Mar 2022 03:10 |
References: | Balke, N., Gordon, R., 1989. The estimation of prewar gross national product: methodology and new evidence. Journal of Political Economy 97 (1), 38–92. Campbell, J., Mankiw, N., 1987. Are output fluctuations transitory? Quarterly Journal of Economics 102, 857–880. Cecchetti, S., Lam, P., 1994. Variance-ratio tests: Small-sample properties with an application to international output data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12 (2), 177–186. Charles, A., Darné, O, 2010. A note on the uncertain trend in US real GNP. Working Paper, HAL-00547737. Charles, A., Darné, O., Diebolt, C., 2014. A revision of the US business-cycles chronology, 1790–1928. Economics Bulletin 34 (1), 234–244. Cochrane J., 1988. How big is the random walk in GNP? Journal of Political Economy 96(5), 893–920. Cogley, T, 1990. International evidence on the size of the random walk in output. Journal of Political Economy 98 (3), 501–518. DeLong, B., Summers, L., 1988. How does macroeconomic policy affect output? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, 433–480. Dezhbakhsh, H., Levy, D., 1994. Periodic properties of interpolated time series. Economics Letters 44, 221–228. Ehrmann, M., 2000. Comparing monetary policy transmission across European countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 136 (1), 58–83. Franses, P., 2013. Data revisions and periodic properties of macroeconomic data. Economics Letters 120, 139–141. Friedman, M., Schwartz, A., 1982. Monetary Trends in the US and the UK, NBER. Jaeger, A., 1990. Shock persistence and the measurement of prewar output series. Economics Letters 34, 333–337. Johnston, L., Williamson, S., 2018. The annual real and nominal GDP for the United States, 1790–1928,” www.measuringworth.com/datasets/usgdp12/sourcegdp.php (accessed: Sept. 13, 2018). Kaufmann, D., 2020. Is deflation costly after all? The perils of erroneous historical classifications. Journal of Applied Econometrics 35(5), 614–628. Leung, S., 1992. Changes in the behavior of output in the United Kingdom, 1856–1990. Economics Letters 40, 435-444. Levy, D., Chen, H., 1994. Estimates of the aggregate quarterly capital stock series for the post-war U.S. economy. Review of Income and Wealth 40, 317–349. Levy, D., Dezhbakhsh, H., 2003. International evidence on output fluctuation and shock persistence. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 1499–1530. Levy, D., Snir, A., Chen, H., Gotler, A., 2020. Not all price endings are created equal: Price points and asymmetric price rigidity. Journal of Monetary Economics 110, 33–49. Measuring Worth, 2022. Notes on three centuries of UK GDP and seven centuries of English GDP. https://measuringworth.com/datasets/ukgdp/#, accessed February 8, 2022. Murray, C., Nelson, C., 2000. The uncertain trend in U.S. GDP. Journal of Monetary Economics 46(1), 79–95. Nelson, C., Plosser, C., 1982. Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 10, 139–162. Orlando, G., Zimatore, G., 2018. Recurrence quantification analysis of business cycles. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 110, 82–94. Romer, C., 1986. Is the Stabilization of the Postwar Economy a Figment of the Data? American Economic Review 76(3), 314–334. Romer, C., 1989. The prewar business cycle reconsidered: new estimates of gross national product, 1869–1908. Journal of Political Economy 97, l–37. Stock, J., Watson, M., 1986. Does GNP have a unit root? Economic Letters 22, 147–151. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112493 |