Tandon, Anjali (2020): Revisiting Factor Proportions in the Indian Economy – A Study with Focus on Tradable Sectors. Published in: Economic and Political Weekly , Vol. LV (3), No. January (2020)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112773.pdf Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Factor productivity is traditionally studied through the measurement of factor intensity for sectors of the economy. However, this measurement is restricted to their direct use within the sector ignoring their embeddedness in upstream sectors. Therefore, an underestimation of the factor intensities across economic sectors cannot be ruled out if evaluated using direct factor contents alone. An a priori external influence on demand (through exports) and investment (through FDI), is expected to shape the allocation of production and subsequent factor demand. Thus, this article examines the structural coherence of factor proportions with output, exports and FDI, separately for each tradable sector. Likewise for factor intensities, tradables are often studied in isolation from their interaction with the non-tradables. Using of Semi Input-Output (SIO) modelling, the factor proportions (K-to-L) show a significant underestimation of the capital intensity for the economy when compared with direct proportions. Although the output and export distributions are largely aligned with factor endowments, the distribution of FDI is skewed towards sectors with high capital proportions. Thus, FDI is unlikely to be solution to employment generation without re-orienting and enhancing the existing skills.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Revisiting Factor Proportions in the Indian Economy – A Study with Focus on Tradable Sectors |
English Title: | Revisiting Factor Proportions in the Indian Economy – A Study with Focus on Tradable Sectors |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Factor proportion, tradables, Input-Output, labour intensive, FDI, India, KLEMS. |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O20 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies |
Item ID: | 112773 |
Depositing User: | Anjali Tandon |
Date Deposited: | 20 Apr 2022 07:09 |
Last Modified: | 20 Apr 2022 07:09 |
References: | A., Panagariya. (2017): “Indian Industry Not Investing in Job-Intensive Sectors”, The Economic Times, 25 August. A., Srivastava (2012): “Heckscher Ohlin Vanek Theorem: An excess supply approach”, MPRA Paper No. 38279. C., Hamilton and L.E.O., Svensson (1983): “Should Direct or Total Factor Intensities Be Used in Tests of the Factor Proportions Hypothesis?”, WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, Vol 119, pp 453–463. D., Coondoo, C., Neogi, and B., Ghosh (1993): “Technology-intensive Industrialisation in LDCs: Experience of Indian Industries”, Economic and Political Weekly, 28, No. 8/9, M43-M52. D.K., Das, A.A., Erumban, S. Aggarwal, and P.C., Das. (2018): “Measuring Productivity at the Industry Level, The India KLEMS Database”, Data Manual 2017, Version 4, Delhi School of Economics. E.E., Leamer (1984): Sources of International Comparative Advantage: Theory and Evidence, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press. G., Bahal, M, Raissi, and V. Tulin (2018): “Crowding-out or Crowding-in? Public and Private Investment in India”, World Development, Vol 109. H., Rathee (2016): “Textile Sector in India & Scope for International Technology Transfer and Cooperation”, Presentation Arvind Limited (India), 28 September. Accessed at http://knowledgeplatform.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Textile_presentation.pdf International Labour Organisation. (2018): “Emerging Technologies and the Future of Work in India”, Tandem Research, ILO Asia-Pacific Working Paper Series, June. J., Riedel (1974): “Factor Proportions, Linkages and the Open Developing Economy”, ECONSTOR/Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IFW), Kiel Working Paper No. 20. J., Romalis (2004): “Factor Proportions and the Structure of Commodity Trade”, The American Economic Review, March. J., Tinbergen (1967): Development Planning, World University Library, Weidenfeld and bnicoclosn, London. J., Vanek (1968): “The Factor Proportions Theory: The N-Factor Case”. Kyklos, Vol 21, pp 749–756. K., Sen. (1956): “Capital Output Ratios in Indian Industry”, The Economic Weekly, March 3. K., Sen. (2008): “Trade, FDI and Industrial Transformation in India”, Paper prepared for Research Workshop ‘Emerging trends and patterns of trade and investment in Asia’, Ninth Global Development Network Conference, Brisbane, Australia. K., Sen. (2014): “The Puzzle of Declining Labour Intensity in Organised Indian Manufacturing”, Ideas for India, April 25. K., Singh and M.R. Saluja (2016): “Input-Output Table of India: 2013-14”, NCAER Working Paper 111. M., Alauddin and C. Tisdell (1988): “The Use of Input-Output Analysis to Determine the Appropriateness of Technology and Industries: Evidence from Bangladesh”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, The University of Chicago Press, Vol 36, 369-391. N.D., Karunaratne. (1996): “A Semi Input-Output Analysis of Australian Comparative Advantage”, Chapter 12 in Puttaswamaiah (ed.), Tinbergen and Modern Economics, Indus publishing company, pp 193–210. N.X., Che (2012): “Factor Endowment, Structural Coherence, and Economic Growth”, IMF Working Paper, WP/12/165. P., Gupta, R.,Hasan, and U., Kumar, U. (2008): “What Constrains Indian Manufacturing?”, ERD Working Paper Series No. 119, Asian Development Bank. R.C., Mano and M., Castillo (2015): “The Level of Productivity in Traded and Non Traded Sectors for a Large Panel of Countries”, IMF Working Paper WP/15/48. R.E., Baldwin (1971): “Determinants of the Commodity Structure of U.S. Trade”, The American Economic Review, American Economic Association , Vol 61, pp 126–146. S., Gulhane and R.,Turukmane (2017): “Effect of Make in India on Textile Sector”, Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology, Vol 3, pp 551–555. S., Luis (1999), “Does Public Capital Crowd Out Private Capital? Evidence from India", Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank. Accessed at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/652401468771639280/Does-public-capital-crowd-out-private-capital-evidence-from-India T., Cobbold (2003): “A Comparison of Gross Output and Value-Added Methods of Productivity Estimation”, Productivity Commission Research Memorandum, Canberra. V. N., Balasubramanyam and D., Sapsford. (2007): “Does India Need a Lot More FDI?”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol 42, pp 1549–1555. V., Kathuria, S.N.R., Raj, and K., Sen. (2010), Organised versus Unorganised Manufacturing Performance in The Post-Reform Period, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol 45, pp 55–64. W., Leontief (1953): "Domestic Production and Foreign Trade; The American Capital Position Re-Examined", Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol 97, No 4, pp 332–349. Y., Wei. and V.N., Balasubramanyam (2015): “A Comparative Analysis of China and India’s Manufacturing Sectors”, Economics Working Paper Series 2015/003, Lancaster University Management School. Z.A., Rashid. and M.S., Bashir (2000): “Factor Intensity of Trade: Malaysia’s Labour Skills in Manufacturing Trade Flows”, Paper presented at 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Montreal, 10-15 October. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112773 |