Maebayashi, Noritaka and Morimoto, Keiichi (2022): Global Corporate Income Tax Competition, Knowledge Spillover, and Growth.
Preview |
PDF
Maeb_Morimoto_01_20220408.pdf Download (303kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In a two-country model of endogenous growth with international knowledge spillover, corporate income tax competition reproduces the second-best allocation attained by tax harmonization, despite complex externalities. This stems from the positive spillover effect across the border and free trading by Ricardian households in the global financial market. However, such a neutrality result does not hold in the extended model, which includes non-Ricardian households. The equilibrium tax rate under the corporate income tax competition can be excessively high or low, depending on the elasticity of the spillover effect to the share of the firms’ locations.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Global Corporate Income Tax Competition, Knowledge Spillover, and Growth |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | corporate income tax; tax competition; spillover; welfare; economic growth; non- Ricardian household |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F42 - International Policy Coordination and Transmission H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H54 - Infrastructures ; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock |
Item ID: | 112790 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Keiichi Morimoto |
Date Deposited: | 20 Apr 2022 07:08 |
Last Modified: | 20 Apr 2022 07:09 |
References: | Aghion, P., U. Akcigit., J. Cage ́, and W. R. Kerr (2016), Taxation, corruption, and growth. European Economic Review 86, 24–51. Aghion, P., and X. Jaravel (2015), Knowledge spillovers, innovation, and growth. Economic Journal 125, 533–573. Alesina, A. and D. Rodrik (1994), Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 465–490. Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G., and F. Robert-Nicoud (2003), Economic Geography and Public Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Baldwin, R.E. and P. Krugman (2004), Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonisation. European Economic Review 48, 1–23. Barro, R.J. (1990), Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, 103–125. Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (2004), Economic Growth, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Becker, D. and M. Rauscher (2013), Fiscal competition and growth when capital is imperfectly mobile. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115, 211–233. Benassy, J. P. (1998), Is there always too little research in endogenous growth with expanding product variety? European Economic Review 42, 61–69. Bom, P.R.D., and J.E. Ligthart (2014), What have we learned from three decades of research on the productivity of public capital? Journal of Economic Surveys 28, 889–916. Borck, R.,and M. Pflu ̈ger (2006), Agglomeration and tax competition. EuropeanEconomic Review 50, 647–668. Bru ̈lhart, M., Jametti, M. and K. Schmidheiny (2012), Do agglomeration economies reduce the sensitivity of firm Location to tax differentials? Economic Journal 122, 1069–1093. Caldero ́n, C., Moral-Benito, E., and L. Serve ́n (2015), Is infrastructure capital productive? A dynamic heterogeneous approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 30, 177–198. Campbell, J. and G. Mankiw (1989), Consumption, income, and interest rates: Reinterpret- ing the time series evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 4, 185–216. Chu, A.C. and C.C. Yang (2012), Fiscal centralization versus decentralization: growth and welfare effects of spillovers, leviathan taxation, and capital mobility. Journal of Urban Economics 71, 177–188. Coe, D.T. and E. Helpman (1995), International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 39, 859–887. Coe, D.T., Helpman, E. and A.W. Hoffmaister (2009), International R&D spillovers and institutions. European Economic Review 53, 723–741. Davis, C. and K. Hashimoto (2018), Corporate tax policy and industry location with fully endogenous productivity growth. Economic Inquiry 56, 1135–1148. Djankov, S., Ganser, T., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R., and A. Shleifer (2010), The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2, 31–64. Dewit, G., Hynes, K., and D. Leahy (2018), Corporate tax games with cross-border externalities from public infrastructure. Economic Inquiry 56, 1047–1063. Feld,L., and J. Heckemeyer (2011), FDI and Taxation: A Meta-Study. Journal of Economic Surveys 25, 233–271. Futagami, K., Y. Morita, and A. Shibata (1993), Dynamic analysis of an endogenous growth model with public capital. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95, 607–625. Gal ́ı, J., Lo ́pez-Salido, J.D., and J. Valle ́s (2004), Rule-of-thumb consumers and the design of interest rate rules. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 36, 739–763. Go ̈rg, H., Molana, H., and C. Montagna (2009),“ Foreign Direct Investment, Tax Competition and Social Expenditure. International Review of Economics and Finance 18, 31–37. Hatfield, J.W. (2015), Federalism, taxation, and economic growth. Journal of Urban Economics 87, 114–125. Hauptmeier, S., Mittermaier, F., and J. Rincke (2012), Fiscal Competition over Taxes and Public Inputs. Regional Science and Urban Economics 42, 407–419. Hori, T., Maebayashi, N., and K. Morimoto (2022), Tax evasion and optimal corporate income tax rates in a growing economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics, published online. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100521000638 Hwang, S.H. and Y.J. Kim (2018), Capital mobility in OECD countries: A multi-level factor approach to saving-investment correlations. Economic Modelling 69, 150–159. Iwaisako, T. (2016), Effects of Patent Protection on Optimal Corporate Income and Consumption Taxes in an R&D-Based Growth Model. Southern Economic Journal 83, 590– 608. Jones, L.E., Manuelli, R. and P. Rossi (1993), Optimal taxation in models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, 1008–1038. Koethenbuerger, M. and B. Lockwood (2010), Does tax competition really promote growth? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 191–206. Lejour, A.M. and H.A. Verbon (1997), Tax competition and redistribution in a two-country endogenous-growth model. International Tax and Public Finance 4, 485–497. Mankiw, G. (2000), The savers-spenders theory of fiscal policy. American Economic Review 90, 120–125. Miyazawa, K., Ogawa, H. and T. Tamai (2019), Capital market integration and fiscal sustainability. European Economic Review 120, 103305. Peretto, P.F. (2003), Fiscal policy and long-run growth in R&D-based models with endogenous market structure. Journal of Economic Growth 8, 325–347. Peretto, P. F. (2007), Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory 137, 353–382. 37 Peretto, P. F. (2011), The growth and welfare effects of deficit-financed dividend tax cuts. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43, 835–869. Rauscher, M. (2005), Economic growth and tax-competing leviathans. International Tax and Public Finance 12, 457–474. Romer, P. (1986), Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002–1037. Rotemberg, J. and M. Woodford (1999), Oligopolistic Pricing and the Effects of Aggregate Demand. Journal of Political Economy 100, 1153–1207. Schnitzer, M. and M. Watzinger (2022), Measuring the Spillovers of Venture Capital. Re- view of Economics and Statistics 104, 276–292. Suzuki, K. (2021), Corporate tax cuts in a Schumpeterian growth model with an endogenous market structure. Journal of Public Economic Theory, published online. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12545 Tamai, T. (2008), A note on dynamic analysis of fiscal competition. Urban Studies 45, 651– 657. Tax Foundation (2021), Corporate tax rates around the world 2021. https://taxfoundation.org/publications/corporate-tax-rates-around-the-world/ The Leaders of the G20 (2021), G20 Rome Leaders’ Declaration. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/52730/g20-leaders-declaration-final.pdf Wildasin, D.E. (2003), Fiscal competition in space and time. Journal of Public Economics 87, 2571–2588. Wilson, J.D. (1986), A theory of interregional tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics 19, 296–315. Young, A. (1998), Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy 106, 41–63. Zodrow, G.R. and P. Mieszkowski (1986), Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics 19, 356–370. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112790 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Global Corporate Income Tax Competition, Knowledge Spillover, and Growth. (deposited 20 Apr 2022 07:08) [Currently Displayed]