Does climate change concern alter tax morale preferences? Evidence from an Italian survey

Cascavilla, Alessandro (2022): Does climate change concern alter tax morale preferences? Evidence from an Italian survey.

Abstract

Given the increasing relevance of sustainability debates, this paper investigates the relationship between the climate change concern and the willingness to pay an environmental tax, considering the interplay with the general level of individual tax morale. By employing a survey among Italian economics students, we show that the climate change concern affects the attitude towards paying an environmental tax both directly and indirectly, via a change in the preferences between the general and the specific tax morale. We find that also tax immoral subjects are significantly willing to pay an environmental tax as their awareness of climate change increases. Given the goal to increase the public acceptance of an environmental tax, we provide three main policy implications: i) carry on campaigns to increase the general level of tax morale, following the guidelines given by the OECD (2019); ii) raise the climate change awareness among people, for instance through investments in sensibilization campaigns on environmental-related topics; iii) increase awareness about climate change in particular among individuals who show lower attitude towards paying taxes. The evidence about an inconsistent tax preference made us recommend a policy addressed to a specific target group rather than to individuals and based on non-monetary incentives, such as nudging and moral suasion tools.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Energy survey; Carbon tax; Climate change; Tax evasion and avoidance; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q40 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General

References

Aldy, J.E.; Stavins, R.N. The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon: Theory and Experience. J. Environ. Dev. 2012, 21, 152–180.

Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1082-1095.

Allcott, H., & Rogers, T. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. American Economic Review, 104(10), 3003-37.

Alm, J., Bloomquist, K.M., McKee, M. (2015). On the external validity of laboratory policy experiments. Econ. Inq., 53 (2) (2015), pp. 1170-1186

Alm, J., Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology 27, 224–246.

Andriani, L. (2016). Tax morale and prosocial behaviour: evidence from a Palestinian survey, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 40, Issue 3, May 2016, Pages 821–841, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev019

Andor, M. A., Gerster, A., Peters, J., & Schmidt, C. M. (2020). Social norms and energy conservation beyond the US. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 103, 102351.

Barabas, J., & Jerit, J. (2010). Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid? American Political Science Review, 104(2), 226-242. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000092

Belmonte, A., Dell'Anno, R., & Teobaldelli, D. (2018). Tax morale, aversion to ethnic diversity, and decentralization. European Journal of Political Economy, 55, 204-223.

Blumenthal, M., Christian, C. and Slemrod, J. (2001). Do normative appeals affect tax compliance? Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. National Tax Journal 54(1): 125–138.

Bott, M. K., Cappelen, A.W., Sørensen, E.Ø., and Tungodden, B. (2019). You’ve Got Mail: A Randomized Field Experiment on Tax Evasion. Management science

Brandon, A., List, J.A., Metcalfe, R.D., Price, M.K., Rundhammer, F. (2019). Testing for crowd out in social nudges: Evidence from a natural field experiment in the market for electricity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2019, 116 (12) 5293-5298.

Buckley, P. (2020). Prices, information and nudges for residential electricity conservation: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 172, 106635.

Caferra, R., Colasante, A., Morone, A. (2021). The less you burn, the more we earn: The role of social and political trust on energy-saving behaviour in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science. Volume 71, January 2021, 101812.

Castro, L. and Scartascini, C. (2013). Tax compliance and enforcement in the Pampas: evidence from a field Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 116: 65–82.

Choo, C., Fonseca, M., Myles, G. (2016). Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2016; 124:102-114

Colasante, A., D'Adamo, I., Morone, P. (2021). Nudging for the increased adoption of solar energy? Evidence from a survey in Italy. Energy Research & Social Science. Volume 74, April 2021, 101978.

Cummings, R. et al. (2009), “Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 70/3, pp. 447-457, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.02.010.

Del Carpio, L. (2014). Are the neighbors cheating? Evidence from a social norm experiment on property taxes in Peru. Mimeo, INSEAD.

Doerrenberg, P. (2015). Does the use of tax revenue matter for tax compliance behavior? Economics Letters, Volume 128, Pages 30-34.

ESS Round 8: European Social Survey Round 8 Data (2016). Data file edition 2.2. NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC. doi:10.21338/NSD-ESS8-2016.

EVS (2020): European Values Study Longitudinal Data File 1981-2008 (EVS 1981-2008). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4804 Data file Version 3.1.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13486

Ferraro, P.J., Price, M.K., 2013. Using non-pecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95, 64–73.

Gilbert, B., & Zivin, J. G. (2014). Dynamic salience with intermittent billing: Evidence from smart electricity meters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107, 176-190.

Halla, M. (2012). Tax morale and compliance behavior: First evidence on a causal link. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12(1).

Harring, N.; Jagers, S.C. 2013. Should We Trust in Values? Explaining Public Support for pro-Environmental Taxes. Sustainability 2013, 5, 210–227.

Horodnic, I. A. (2018). Tax morale and institutional theory: a systematic review. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.

Lago-Peñas I., Lago-Peñas S. (2010). The determinants of tax morale in comparative perspective: Evidence from European countries. European Journal of Political Economy 26 (2010) 441–453.

Lozza, E., Kastlunger, B., Tagliabue, S., & Kirchler, E. (2013). The Relationship Between Political Ideology and Attitudes Toward Tax Compliance: The Case of Italian Taxpayers. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.108

Luttmer, E. F., & Singhal, M. (2014). Tax morale. Journal of economic perspectives, 28(4), 149-68.

Muhammad, I., Mohd Hasnu, N.N., Ekins, P. (2021). “Review: Empirical Research of Public Acceptance on Environmental Tax: A Systematic Literature Review”. Environments 2021, 8,109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ environments8100109.

Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 34(7), 913-923.

OECD. (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270480-en.

OECD. (2019). Tax Morale: What Drives People and Businesses to Pay Tax?, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f3d8ea10-en.

OECD. (2021). Taxing Energy Use for Sustainable Development; OECD Publishing: Paris, France.

Park, S. O., & Yoon, S. M. (2017). The effects of taxpayer’s environmental morale on the willingness to pay environmental tax for sustainable environment. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(24), 14054-14063.

Savin, I.; Drews, S.; Maestre-Andrés, S.; van den Bergh, J. (2020). Public Views on Carbon Taxation and Its Fairness: A Computational-Linguistics Analysis. Clim. Change 2020, 162, 2107–2138.

Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological science, 18(5), 429-434.

Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00123-1

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.

Torgler, B. (2004). Cross-culture comparison of tax morale and tax compliance: evidence from Costa Rica and Switzerland. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 45(1–2): 17–43.

Torgler, B. (2005). Tax morale and direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy 21 (2), 525–531.

Umit, R., Schaffer, L.M. (2020). Attitudes Towards Carbon Taxes Across Europe: The Role of Perceived Uncertainty and Self-Interest. Energy Policy 2020, 140, 1–7.

United National Framework Convention on Climate Change (2015). Paris Agreement. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.

Williams, C. C., & Krasniqi, B. (2017). Evaluating the individual-and country-level variations in tax morale. Journal of Economic Studies.