SDIRI, Hanen (2022): The Influence of Environmental Commitment and Innovation on Export Intensity: Firm-Level Evidence from Tunisia.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_113793.pdf Download (376kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study utilizes structural equation modeling (SEM) to analyze the extent to which environmental commitment and innovation increase the export intensity of Tunisian firms. Relying on firm-level data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey conducted in 2020, we empirically test how environmental commitment increases export intensity through innovation. This study distinguishes between two types of innovation; product innovation and process innovation. We show that environmental commitment is useful in stimulating both product and process innovation. We find that environmental commitment and product innovation drive exports. Yet, process innovation does not affect exports. Moreover, our results highlight that quality certification interacts with the relationship between environmental commitment and process innovation. The results can help decision-makers understand how environmental commitment represents an important strategy for companies to be more innovative and oriented towards export.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Influence of Environmental Commitment and Innovation on Export Intensity: Firm-Level Evidence from Tunisia |
English Title: | The Influence of Environmental Commitment and Innovation on Export Intensity: Firm-Level Evidence from Tunisia |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Product innovation. Process innovation. Environmental Commitment. Export intensity. Quality certification. Tunisian firms. |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F63 - Economic Development F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F64 - Environment O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights |
Item ID: | 113793 |
Depositing User: | Hanen SDIRI |
Date Deposited: | 03 Aug 2022 13:17 |
Last Modified: | 03 Aug 2022 13:17 |
References: | Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving Sustainably: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 197-218. Barasa, L., Kimuyu, P., Vermeulen, P., Knoben, J., and Kinyanjui, B. (2017). Institutions, resources, and innovation in developing countries: A firm-level approach. Research Policy, 46, 280–291. Becker, S.O., Egger, P.H (2013). Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm’s propensity to export. Empirical Economics. 44, 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0322-6 Cameron. G. (1996). Innovation and economic growth. Discussion paper N° 277 available from https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/20685/1/Innovation_and_Economic_Growth.pdf Carrillo-Higueras, F., Prajogo, D., and Smith, L. (2018). Environmental commitment and its drivers in the Australian wine industry: a behavioral approach. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 1–20. doi:10.1080/14486563.2018.1460630. Chang, CH. (2011). The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation. Journal of Business Ethics. 104, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0914-x. Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543. Chen, Y. and Chang, C. (2013). Towards green trust: The influences of green perceived quality, green perceived risk, and green satisfaction. Management Decision, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311291319. Chin. W (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi V, Chin W, Henseler J, et al. (eds) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 655–690. Cieślik, A., & Michałek, J. J. (2018). Firm-level determinants of direct and indirect exports: empirical evidence for C.E.E. and M.E.N.A. countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 982–996. doi:10.1080/1331677x.2018.1436452. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J.J., & Szczygielski, K. (2016). Innovations and Export Performance: Firm-level Evidence from Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(4), 11-28, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040402. Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D. and Vasvari, F.P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 122-144. Cole. M.S, Bruch. H and Vogel. B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of organizational behavior. 27, 463–484. Cordeiro, J.J. and Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 104-114. D’Angelo. A (2012). Innovation and export performance: a study of Italian high-tech SMEs. Journal of Management & Governance. 16(3), pages 393-423. Doran, J. and Ryan, G. (2012). Regulation and firm perception, eco‐innovation and firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272367. Dowell, G., Hart, S. and Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 8, pp. 1059-1074. Ebling G, Janz N (1999). Export and innovation activities in the German service sector. Empirical evidence at the firm level. ZEW discussion paper no. 99–53, Zentrum fur Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Mannheim. Edeh, J. N., Obodoechi, D. N., and Ramos-Hidalgo, E. (2020). Effects of innovation strategies on export performance: New empirical evidence from developing market firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120167. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120167. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50. Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2010). Exporting and Environmental Performance: A Firm-level Productivity Analysis. World Economy, 33(1), 60–88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01188.x . Guoyou, Q., Saixing, Z., Chiming, T., Haitao, Y., and Hailiang, Z. (2011). Stakeholders’ Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 1–14. doi:10.1002/csr.283. Haddoud. M.Y, Onjewu, A-K E, Nowiński. W. (2021). Environmental commitment and innovation as catalysts for export performance in family firms. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 173 121085. Hair, J., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice 19 (2), 139–152. Hirunyawipada, T. and Xiong, G. (2018). Corporate environmental commitment and financial performance: moderating effects of marketing and operations capabilities, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 86, pp. 22-31. Hojnik, J., and Ruzzier, M. (2016). What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 31-41. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.006. Kock, N., (2014). Dichotomous variables. [Weblog] WarpPLS blog. May 22, 2014. Available from. http://warppls.blogspot.com/search/label/dichotomous%20variables. Kock, N., (2020). WarpPLS User Manual: Version 7.0. ScriptWarp Systems, Laredo. Lederman. D (2010). An international multilevel analysis of product innovation. Journal of International Business Studies. 41 (4), pp. 606-619. Lόpez, M.V., Garcia, A. and Rodriguez, L. (2007), Sustainable development and corporate performance: a study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 285-300. Martin-Tapia. I, J. Aragón-Correa. A and Rueda-Manzanares. A (2010). Environmental strategy and exports in medium, small and micro-enterprises. Journal of World Business, vol. 45, issue 3, 266-275. OCDE (2005). La mesure des activités scientifiques et technologiques. Manuel d’Oslo, Principes directeurs pour le recueil et l’interprétation des données sur l’innovation, 2005. Rodil Ó.M, Vence. X and Carreira. M. C. S (2016). The relationship between innovation and export behavior: The case of Galician firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 113:248–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.002 Rodríguez, J., Rodríguez, R., (2005). Technology and export behavior: A resource-based view approach. International Business Review 14 (5), 539–557 Romer, Paul M. 1994. The Origins of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (1) : 3-22. Sam Tavassoli, (2017). The role of product innovation on export behavior of firms: Is it innovation input or innovation output that matters? European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 294-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2016-0124. Sarkis, J, Gonzalez-Torre, P and Adenso-Diaz, B (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 163–176. Schaltegger. S and Wagner. M (2011). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Innovation: Categories and Interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment 20(4):222 – 237. Sdiri, H and Ayadi, M (2022). Does Innovation Foster or Mitigate the Corruption Obstacle? Firm-Level Evidence from Tunisia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 367–386 (2022). Seth, D., Rehman, M.A.A. and Shrivastava, R.L. (2018). Green manufacturing drivers and their relationships for small and medium (SME) and large industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 198, pp. 1381-1405. Sharma. S. (2000). Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 4 pp. 681-697 Sikharulidze. D and Kikutadze. V (2017). Innovation and Export Competitiveness: Evidence from Georgia Firms. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies. DOI:10.26417/EJES.V8I1.P131-137. Suasana. I and Ikawati. Ni. W. (2018). Environmental commitment and green innovation reaching success new products of creative industry in Bali. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research 12(04). Tavassoli, S. (2018). The role of product innovation on export behavior of firms: Is it innovation input or innovation output that matters? European Journal of Innovation Management. 21(2), pp. 294-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2016-0124. Teng, M.-J., Wu, S.-Y., and Chou, S. J.-H. (2013). Environmental Commitment and Economic Performance - Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 16–27. doi:10.1002/eet.1634. Utomo. M. N, Cahyaningrum. W and Kaujan (2019). Does Green Business Improve Corporate Image and Firm Value? International journal of scientific and technology research, 8, 12. Vu, T. T., and Dang, W. V. T. (2020). Environmental commitment and firm financial performance: a moderated mediation study of environmental collaboration with suppliers and CEO gender. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. Wagner J (1996). Export performance, human capital, and product innovation in Germany: a micro view. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Review of Economics. 47: 40–45. Walley, N., and Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–51. Wang H, Khan MAS, Anwar F, Shahzad F, A du D and Murad M (2021). Green Innovation Practices and Its Impacts on Environmental and Organizational Performance. Frontirts. Psychology. 11:553625. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.553625. White, P. (2009). Building a sustainability strategy into the business. Corporate Governance, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910984936. Xing, Liu, Wang, Shen, and Zhu. (2019). Environmental Regulation, Environmental Commitment, Sustainability Exploration/Exploitation Innovation, and Firm Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 11(21), 6001. doi:10.3390/su11216001. Zhu, Q. and Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 265-289. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/113793 |