Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries

Destek, Mehmet Akif and Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu and Asamoah, Ernest Frimpong (2020): Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries. Published in: Biomass and Bioenergy No. 149 (1 June 2021)

Abstract

Efficient use of biomass energy is integral to achieving many of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Their contributions, trade-off patterns, and implementation vary geographically, requiring in-depth analysis to sustainably manage its impact. Here, we analyzed the contribution of biomass energy intensity and efficiency on sustainable development across the top five biomass energy-consuming countries—Brazil, China, Germany, India, and the US. We compared the impact of biomass energy consumption, economic development, urbanization, and trade openness on carbon dioxide emissions and ecological footprint. Using annual frequency data from 1970 to 2016, we utilized continuously-updated fully-modified, and continuously-updated bias-corrected panel estimation techniques that allow controlling of cross-section dependence among sampled countries. Our empirical analysis shows income level escalates ecological footprint and emissions by 0.05-0.21%. Similarly, urban sprawl increases long-term emissions and ecological footprint by 0.07-0.17%. Biomass energy consumption increases ecological footprint by 0.18-0.90% but declines emissions by 0.02-0.09%. However, trade openness reduces both ecological footprint and CO2 emissions by 0.34-0.55%. Our results reveal that income level stimulates biomass consumption in early stages of growth, but declines in technologically oriented industrial-based economy, however, outgrows in service-inspired economy. This highlights that biomass extraction in developed countries can surpass regenerative capability, necessitating sustainable domestic material consumption management.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Biomass energy; domestic material consumption; economic growth; trade openness; urbanization
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology

References

[1] T.O. Wiedmann, H. Schandl, M. Lenzen, D. Moran, S. Suh, J. West, K. Kanemoto, The material footprint of nations, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 112 (2015) 6271-6276.

[2] P. Owusu, S.S. Asumadu, A Review of Renewable Energy Sources, Sustainability Issues and Climate Change Mitigation. Cogent Eng. 3 (2016) 1167990.

[3] IRENA. (2018). The International Renewable Energy Agency. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org

[4] D. Arvizu, T. Bruckner, H. Chum, O. Edenhofer, S. Estefen, A. Faaij, M. Fischedick, G. Hansen, G. Hiriart, O. Hohmeyer, K.G.T. Hollands, J. Huckerby, S. Kadner, Å. Killingtveit, A. Kumar, A. Lewis, O. Lucon, P. Matschoss, L. Maurice, M. Mirza, C. Mitchell, W. Moomaw, J. Moreira, L.J. Nilsson, J. Nyboer, R. Pichs-Madruga, J. Sathaye, J. Sawin, R. Schaeffer, T. Schei, S. Schlömer, K. Seyboth, R. Sims, G. Sinden, Y. Sokona, C. von Stechow, J. Steckel, A. Verbruggen, R. Wiser, F. Yamba, T. Zwickel. Technical summary. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA (2011)

[5] I.K. Maji, C. Sulaiman. Renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus: A fresh evidence from West Africa, Energy Reports 5 (2019) 384-392.

[6] Field, Christopher B., J. Elliott Campbell, and David B. Lobell. "Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource." Trends in ecology & evolution 23.2 (2008): 65-72.

[7] Enerdata. (2019). Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2019. Retrieved from https://yearbook.enerdata.net

[8] D. Thrän, T. Seidenberger, J. Zeddies, R. Offermann, Global biomass potentials—Resources, drivers and scenario results. Energy for sustainable development 14(3) (2010) 200-205.

[9] M.F. Seleiman, A. Santanen, F. L. Stoddard, P. Mäkelä, Feedstock quality and growth of bioenergy crops fertilized with sewage sludge, Chemosphere 89(10) (2012) 1211-1217.

[10] M. F. Seleiman, A. Santanen, S. Jaakkola, P. Ekholm, H. Hartikainen, F. I. Stoddard, P. S. Mäkelä, Biomass yield and quality of bioenergy crops grown with synthetic and organic fertilizers. biomass and bioenergy 59 (2013) 477-485.

[11] D.K. Bryngelsson, K. Lindgren, Why large-scale bioenergy production on marginal land is unfeasible: A conceptual partial equilibrium analysis, Energy Policy 55 (2013) 454-466.

[12] A. Ignaciuk, F. Vöhringer, A. Ruijs, E. C. Van Ierland, Competition between biomass and food production in the presence of energy policies: a partial equilibrium analysis, Energy policy 34(10) (2016) 1127-1138.

[13] D. J. Johansson, C. Azar, A scenario based analysis of land competition between food and bioenergy production in the US, Climatic Change 82(3-4) (2007) 267-291.

[14] R. L. Naylor, A. J. Liska, M.B. Burke, W. P. Falcon, J. C. Gaskell, S. D. Rozelle, & K. G. Cassman, The ripple effect: biofuels, food security, and the environment. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 49(9) (2007) 30-43.

[15] M. Bildirici, F. Özaksoy, An analysis of biomass consumption and economic growth in transition countries, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja 31(1) (2018) 386-405.

[16] S.A. Sarkodie, V. Strezov, H. Weldekidan, E. F. Asamoah, P. A. Owusu, I. N. Y. Doyi, Environmental sustainability assessment using dynamic autoregressive-distributed lag simulations—nexus between greenhouse gas emissions, biomass energy, food and economic growth. Science of the total environment 668 (2019) 318-332.

[17] O. A. Adewuyi, O. B. Awodumi, Biomass energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: Fresh evidence from West Africa using a simultaneous equation model, Energy 119 (2017) 453-471.

[18] K. Danish, Z. Wang, Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries, Sci. Total Environ. 670 (2019) 1075-1083.

[19] E. G. Hertwich, G. P. Peters, Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (2009) 6414-6420.

[20] Z.Mrabet, M. Alsamara, Testing the Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Qatar: A comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70 (2017) 1366-1375.

[21] U. Al-Mulali, I. Ozturk, The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region, Energy 84 (2015) 382-389.

[22] U. Al-Mulali, C. Weng-Wai, L. Sheau-Ting, A. H. Mohammed, Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation, Ecological Indicators 48 (2015) 315-323.

[23] M.A. Destek, A. Sinha, Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries, Journal of Cleaner Production 242 (2020) 118537.

[24] X.Q. Zhang, The trends, promises and challenges of urbanisation in the world. Habitat international 54 (2016) 241-252.

[25] H. Ritchie, M. Roser, "Renewable Energy". Published online at OurWorldInData.org. (2020) Retrieved from: 'https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy' [Online Resource]

[26] M.H. Pesaran, General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (2004).

[27] M.H. Pesaran, A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence, Journal of applied econometrics 22(2) (2007) 265-312.

[28] J. Westerlund, Error correction based panel cointegration tests, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69 (2007) 709-748.

[29] J. Bai, C. Kao, S. Ng, Panel cointegration with global stochastic trends, Journal of Econometrics 149(1) (2009) 82-99.

[30] J. Bai, C. Kao, On the estimation and inference of a panel cointegration model with cross-sectional dependence. Contributions to economic analysis 274 (2006) 3-30.

[31] N. M. Kiefer, T. J. Vogelsang,. Heteroskedasticity-autocorrelation robust standard errors using the Bartlett kernel without truncation, Econometrica,70(5) (2002) 2093-2095.

[32] D. Khan, R. Ulucak, How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies, Science of The Total Environment (2020) 136504.

[33] F. Bilgili, I. Öztürk, E. Koçak, Ü. Bulut, Y. Pamuk, E. Muğaloğlu, H. H. Bağlıtaş, The influence of biomass energy consumption on CO 2 emissions: a wavelet coherence approach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(19) (2016) 19043-19061.

[34] E. Dogan, R. Inglesi-Lotz, Analyzing the effects of real income and biomass energy consumption on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: empirical evidence from the panel of biomass-consuming countries, Energy 138 (2017) 721-727.

[35] M. Shahbaz, D. Balsalobre, S. J. H. Shahzad, The influencing factors of CO 2 emissions and the role of biomass energy consumption: statistical experience from G-7 countries, Environmental Modeling & Assessment 24(2) (2019) 143-161.

[36] M. A. Destek, A. Aslan, Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries, Renewable Energy 151 (2020) 1298-1306.

[37] P. A. Owusu, S. Asumadu-Sarkodie, A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation, Cogent Engineering 3(1) (2016) 1167990.

[38] S. Wang, Q. Li, C. Fang, C. Zhou, The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China, Science of the Total Environment 542 (2016) 360-371.

[39] S. Kais, H. Sami, An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty eight countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 59 (2016) 1101-1110.

[40] F. Belaid, M. Youssef, Environmental degradation, renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth: Assessing the evidence from Algeria, Energy Policy 102 (2017) 277-287.

[41] M. Salahuddin, K. Alam, I. Ozturk, K. Sohag. The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81 (2018) 2002-2010.

[42] S. Erdogan, D. Ç. Yildirim, A. Gedikli, Investigation of Causality Analysis between Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: The Case of BRICS–T Countries, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 9(6) (2019) 430-438.

[43] M.A. Destek, S. A. Sarkodie, Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development, Science of the Total Environment 650 (2019) 2483-2489.

[44] M.A. Baloch, J. Zhang, K. Iqbal, Z. Iqbal, The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(6) (2019) 6199-6208.

[45] E. Dogan, B. Turkekul, CO 2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(2) (2016) 1203-1213.

[46] S. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Bae, Does trade openness affect CO 2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24(21) (2017) 17616-17625.

[47] G. Gozgor, Does trade matter for carbon emissions in OECD countries? Evidence from a new trade openness measure, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24(36) (2017) 27813-27821.

[48] M. Shahbaz, S. Nasreen, K. Ahmed, S. Hammoudeh, Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels, Energy Economics 61 (2017) 221-232.

[49] S.A. Sarkodie, P. A. Owusu, T. Leirvik, Global effect of urban sprawl, industrialization, trade and economic development on carbon dioxide emissions, Environmental Research Letters 15(3) (2020) 034049.

[50] S.A. Sarkodie, S. Adams, Electricity access, human development index, governance and income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa, Energy Reports 6 (2020) 455-466.

[51] IEA (2014). World energy outlook special report. Africa energy outlook. Retrieved from http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2014_AfricaEnergyOutlook.pdf

[52] M.A. Barrett, J. L. Brown, M. K. Morikawa, J. N. Labat, A. D. Yoder, CITES designation for endangered rosewood in Madagascar, Science 328(5982) (2010) 1109-1110.

[53] M. A. Destek, Deindustrialization, Reindustrialization and Environmental Degradation: Evidence from Ecological Footprint of Turkey, Journal of Cleaner Production (2021) 126612.

[54] Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Environmental performance, biocapacity, carbon & ecological footprint of nations: Drivers, trends and mitigation options. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 141912.