Sánchez-Masi, Luis (2022): La política económica neoclásica en América Latina: génesis y consecuencias de cuatro décadas perdidas en el desarrollo latinoamericano, 1980-2020. Published in: Desafíos: Economía Y Empresa No. 1 (1 July 2022): pp. 17-40.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_114296.pdf Download (219kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine the effectiveness of economic policies based on neoclassical principles which have been implemented in most of Latin American countries since the eighties. Since then, the region has been losing relative importance in the world. The lag in the last “four lost decades” es quite general and compelling. Rather than eliminating the asymmetric relationship between developed and underdeveloped countries, the historical evidence suggests it is perpetuated by the neoclassical economic policy. In Latin America the neoclassical principles such as free market and international free trade have tended to preserve the same productive structure, thus promoting an erratic development, which depends on the demand and prices of primary products. Until now, no underdeveloped country has reached the first world by applying economic policies based on neoclassical principles. The Asian countries which performed that transition applied policies and strategies opposed to neoclassical principles. Raul Prebisch’s analyses about the inconsistency of neoclassical economic policy with Latin American reality are today as valid as seven decades ago. However, for the great majority of Latin American economists is simply inconceivable that basic principles of neoclassical theory may produce adverse effects on underdeveloped countries. Latin America must rethink the economic policy and strategy for attaining its development.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | La política económica neoclásica en América Latina: génesis y consecuencias de cuatro décadas perdidas en el desarrollo latinoamericano, 1980-2020 |
English Title: | Neoclassical Economic Policy in Latin America: Origins and Consequences of Four Lost Decades in Latin American Development, 1980-2020 |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | Latin America; economic policy; neoclassical economics |
Subjects: | N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics ; Industrial Structure ; Growth ; Fluctuations > N16 - Latin America ; Caribbean O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O24 - Trade Policy ; Factor Movement Policy ; Foreign Exchange Policy |
Item ID: | 114296 |
Depositing User: | Desafíos Economía Y Empresa |
Date Deposited: | 28 Aug 2022 11:43 |
Last Modified: | 28 Aug 2022 11:43 |
References: | Banco Mundial. (2020). Indicadores del desarrollo mundial. https://databank.bancomundial.org/source/world-development-indicators Chang, H.-J. (2010). 23 things they don’t tell you about capitalism. Bloomsbury Press. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (1991). Anuario estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe 1991. Naciones Unidas. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2014). Anuario estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe 2014. Naciones Unidas. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2017). Anuario estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe 2017. Naciones Unidas. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2018a). La inversión extranjera directa en América Latina y el Caribe 2018. Naciones Unidas. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2018b). Anuario estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe 2018. Naciones Unidas. Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre Comercio y Desarrollo. (2018). Handbook of Statistics 2018. United Nations Publications. Denison, E. F. (1967). Why growth rates differ: postwar experience in nine western countries. Brookings Institution. Ferraro, V. (1996). Dependency theory: an introduction. En G. Secondi (Ed.), The development economics reader (pp. 58-64). Routledge. Garnaut, R., Song, L., & Fang, C. (2018). China’s 40 years of reform and development 1978-2018. Australian National University Press. Giner Pérez, G., & Giner Pérez, J. M. (2002). La inversión extranjera en china: análisis y políticas. Boletín Económico de ICE, 2733, 43-53. Guillén, A. (2007). Modelos de desarrollo y estrategias alternativas en América Latina. http://www.centrocelsofurtado.org.br/arquivos/image/201108311505340.A_GUILLEN3.pdf Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. Nicolas, F., Thomsen, S., & Bang, M. (2013). Lessons from investment policy reform in Korea [OECD Working Papers on International Investments 2013/02]. https://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/WP-2013_2.pdf Ocampo, J. A. (2014). The Latin American debt crisis in historical perspective. En J. E. Stiglitz & D. Heymann (Eds.), Life after debt (pp. 87-115). Palgrave Macmillan. Organización Mundial del Comercio. (2020). Merchandise trade. https://data.wto.org/ Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. (2000). Main determinants and impact of foreign direct investments on China’s economy [OECD Working Papers on International Investments 2000/04]. https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2000_4.pdf Prebisch, R. (1948). El desarrollo económico de América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas. Naciones Unidas. Reinert, E. (2007). How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. Constable & Robinson. Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes. Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University Press. Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox. Democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton & Company. Sanchez-Masi, L. (2019). Política alternativa para el desarrollo latinoamericano. Ensayo sobre un nuevo paradigma del desarrollo latinoamericano. BookBaby. Singer, H. W. (1998). Terms of trade fifty years later. Convergence and divergence. South Letter, 30, 13-25. Smit, A. J. (2010). The competitive advantage of nations: is Porter’s diamond framework a new theory that explains the international competitiveness of countries? Southern African Business Review, 14(1), 105-130. Sowell, T. (2011). Basic economics: a common-sense guide to the economy. Basic Books. Sunkel, O. (1969). National development policy and external dependence in Latin America. The Journal of Development Studies, 6(1), 23-48. Tseng, W., & Rodlauer, M. (2003). China competing in the global economy. International Monetary Fund. United Nations. (2016). 2016 International Trade Statistics Yearbook. Department of Economic and Social Affairs |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/114296 |