El-Khalifi, Ahmed and Ouakil, Hicham and Torres, José L. (2022): Efficiency and Welfare Effects of Fiscal Policy in Emerging Economies: The Case of Morocco.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_114896.pdf Download (286kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The welfare cost of fiscal policy does not only depend on distortions by taxation, but also on how public revenues are spent in the economy, and on wealth inequality. Many of the government's spending activities are related to the provision of consumption goods and services, and the provision of public inputs. Hence, optimal taxation policy is not independent of how fiscal revenues are spent. This paper uses a model with two types of agents: Active households (who behave as Ricardian agents) and non-active government-dependent households (who behave as hand-to-mouth agents). The model economy considers a detailed government for both fiscal revenues and public spending. We compute welfare changes of different tax rates and alternative spending policies and quantify the trade-off of fiscal policy across the two groups of agents. The main results can be presented as follows: i) Distortions from some taxes on economic activity can be positive due to the presence of public inputs. ii) Output efficiency can be gained by changing the tax mix while keeping constant fiscal revenues. iii) Total welfare gains can be obtained by increasing tax rates, except the capital income tax, at the cost of reducing the welfare of active households.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Efficiency and Welfare Effects of Fiscal Policy in Emerging Economies: The Case of Morocco |
English Title: | Efficiency and Welfare Effects of Fiscal Policy in Emerging Economies: The Case of Morocco |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Fiscal policy; Active households; Government spending-dependent households; Taxes; Government Spending, Laffer curves; Welfare. |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods |
Item ID: | 114896 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Jose L. Torres |
Date Deposited: | 11 Oct 2022 01:19 |
Last Modified: | 11 Oct 2022 01:19 |
References: | Aaron, H. J. (1990). Discussion of why is infrastructure important. Munnell A. H. (ed.), Is there a shortfall in public capital investment, 51-63. Aiyagari, S. Christiano, L. and Eichenbaum, M. (1992). The output, employment, and interest rate effects of government consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics, 30(1): 73-86. Amano, R. A. and Wirjanto, T. S. (1997). Intratemporal substitution and government spending. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4): 605-609. Aschauer, D. (1985). Fiscal policy and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 75(1): 117-127. Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of monetary economics, 23(2): 177-200. Aschauer, D. (1998). The equilibrium approach to fiscal policy. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 20(1): 41-62. Auerbach, A. J., Kotlikoff, L. J. and Skinner, J. (1983). The efficiency gains from dynamic tax reform. International Economic Review, 24(1): 81-100. Barro, R. J. (1981). Output effects of government purchases. Journal of Political Economy, 89: 1086-1121. Barro, R. J. (1989). The neoclassical approach to fiscal policy, in R. Barro (ed.), Modern Business Cycle Theory, Cambridge University Pres. Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 103-126. Baxter, M. and King, R. (1993). Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. American Economic Review, 83(3): 315-334. Benchimol, J. (2014). Risk aversion in the Eurozone. Research in Economics, 68(1): 39-56. Blanchard, O. and Perotti, R (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of change in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4): 1329-1368. Bouakez, H. and Rebei, N. (2007). Why does private consumption rise after a government spending shock? Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 40(3): 954-979. Boulakia, J. B. (1971). Ibn Khaldûn: A Fourteenth-Century Economist. Journal of Political Economy, 79(5): 1105-1118. 33 Braun, R. (1994). Tax disturbances and real economic activity in the Postwar United States. Journal of Monetary Economics, 33(3): 441-462. Brown, A. and Wells, G. (2008). Substitution between public and private consumption in Australian states. In Conf paper, Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society, Wellington, New Zealand. Cassou, S. P. and Lansing, K. J. (1998). Optimal fiscal policy, public capital, and the productivity slowdown. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22(6): 911-935. Chiu, R. L. (2001). The intratemporal substitution between government spending and private consumption: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Asian Economic Journal, 15(3): 313-323. Dawood, T. C. and Francois, J. N. (2018). Substitution between private and government consumption in African economies. Economic Modelling, 73(1): 129-139. de-Córdoba. G., Molinari B. and Torres J. L., (2022). The government in SNA-compliant DSGE models. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2), 613-642. Fernández-de-Córdoba, G. and Torres, J. L. (2012). Fiscal harmonization in the European Union with public inputs. Economic Modelling, 29(5): 2024-2034. Heathcote, J., Storesletten, K. and Violante, G. L. (2010). The macroeconomic implications of rising wage inequality in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 118(4): 681-722. Jones, L. E., Manuelli, R. E. and Rossi, P. E. (1993). Optimal taxation in models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3): 485-517. Laffer, A. (1981). Government exactions and revenues deficiencies. Cato Journal, 1: 1-21. Laffer, A. B. (2004). The Laffer curve: Past, present, and future. Backgrounder, 1765(1): 1-16. Lambert, R. A. and Larcker, D. F. (1987). An analysis of the use of accounting and market measures of performance in executive compensation contracts. Journal of Accounting Research, 25: 85-125. Macek, R. (2015). The impact of taxation on economic growth: case study of OECD countries. Review of Economic Perspectives, 14(4): 309-328. McGrattan, E. (1994). The macroeconomic effects of distortionary taxation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 33(3): 573-601. Munnell, A. H. (1990). Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment. New England Economic Review, Jan: 3-22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Revenue Statistics in Africa 2021 Morocco. https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/revenue-statistics-africa-morocco.pdf Krusell, P., Quadrini, V. and Rios-Rull, J. V. (1996). Are consumption taxes really better than income taxes? Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(3): 475-503. Perotti, R. (2007). In search of the transmission mechanism of fiscal policy. NBER Macroeconomic Annual, 22. Summers, L. W. (1981). Capital taxation and accumulation in a life cycle growth model. American Economic Review, 71(4): 533-544. Tatom, J. A. (1991). Public capital and private sector performance. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 73: 3-15. Trabandt, M., & Uhlig, H. (2011). The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(4): 305-327. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/114896 |