Group representation concerns and network formation

Melguizo Lopez, Isabel (2022): Group representation concerns and network formation. Forthcoming in: Bulletin of Economic Reserach (8 May 2022)

Abstract

This paper studies processes of integration and segregation using a connections model in which individuals form valuable links that also entail a cost. Individuals belong to two different groups and care about whether their own group represents a sufficient fraction in their neighborhood. Concerns for representation promote the segregation of societies as even for small linking costs individuals do not link to different others because of the threat that their group become under-represented. For certain cost ranges, concerns for representation also determine efficient networks because forming links with members of the opposite group entails a utility loss due to under-representation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: integration; segregation; representation concerns; homophily; welfare; pairwise stability
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Alesina, A. and E. La Ferrara (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. The quarterly journal of economics 115 (3), 847-904.

Ananat, E. O. (2011). The wrong side (s) of the tracks: The causal effects of racial segregation on urban poverty and inequality. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (2), 34-66.

Bala, V. and S. Goyal (2000). A non-cooperative model of network formation. Econometrica 68 (5), 1181-1229.

Battu, H., M. Mwale, and Y. Zenou (2007). Oppositional identities and the labor market. Journal of Population Economics 20 (3), 643-667.

Baumann, L. (2021). A model of weighted network formation. Theoretical Economics 16 (1), 1-23.

Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied psychology 46 (1), 5-34.

Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure, Volume 7. Free Press New York.

Bloch, F. and B. Dutta (2009). Communication networks with endogenous link strength. Games and Economic Behavior 66 (1), 39-56.

Bramoulle, Y. and R. Kranton (2007). Public goods in networks. Journal of Economic Theory 135 (1), 478-494.

Buechel, B. and T. Hellmann (2012). Under-connected and over-connected networks: the role of externalities in strategic network formation. Review of Economic Design 16 (1), 71-87.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Harvard university press.

Calvo-Armengol, A. and R. Ilkilic (2009). Pairwise-stability and nash equilibria in network formation. International Journal of Game Theory 38 (1), 51-79.

Calvo-Armengol, A., E. Patacchini, and Y. Zenou (2009). Peer effects and social networks in education. The Review of Economic Studies 76 (4), 1239-1267.

Card, D., A. Mas, and J. Rothstein (2008). Tipping and the dynamics of segregation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1), 177-218.

Coleman, J. S. (1958). Relational analysis: the study of social organizations with survey methods. Human organization 17 (4), 28.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology 94, S95-S120.

Currarini, S., E. Fumagalli, and F. Panebianco (2017). Peer effects and local congestion in networks. Games and Economic Behavior 105, 40-58.

Currarini, S., M. O. Jackson, and P. Pin (2009). An economic model of friendship: Homophily, minorities, and segregation. Econometrica 77 (4), 1003-1045.

De Marti, J. and Y. Zenou (2017). Segregation in friendship networks. The Scan dinavian Journal of Economics 119 (3), 656-708.

Dev, P. (2014). Identity and fragmentation in networks. Mathematical Social Sciences 71, 86-100.

Fagiolo, G., M. Valente, and N. J. Vriend (2007). Segregation in networks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64 (3-4), 316-336.

Fagiolo, G., M. Valente, and N. J. Vriend (2009). A dynamic model of segregation in small-world networks. In Networks, Topology and Dynamics, pp. 111-126. Springer.

Galeotti, A., S. Goyal, and J. Kamphorst (2006). Network formation with heterogeneous players. Games and Economic Behavior 54 (2), 353-372.

Goeree, J. K., A. Riedl, and A. Ule (2009). In search of stars: Network formation among heterogeneous agents. Games and Economic Behavior 67 (2), 445-466.

Golub, B. and Y. Livne (2010). Strategic random networks. Available at SSRN 1694310 .

Goyal, S. and F. Vega-Redondo (2007). Structural holes in social networks. Journal of Economic Theory 137 (1), 460{492.

Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited.

Grauwin, S., F. Goffette-Nagot, and P. Jensen (2012). Dynamic models of residential segregation: An analytical solution. Journal of Public Economics 96 (1-2), 124-141.

Hostetler, J. A. (1993). Amish society. JHU Press.

Iijima, R. and Y. Kamada (2017). Social distance and network structures. Theoretical Economics 12 (2), 655-689.

Ingram, P. and M. W. Morris (2007). Do people mix at mixers? structure, homophily, and the life of the party". Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (4), 558-585.

Jackson, M. O. and B. W. Rogers (2005). The economics of small worlds. Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (2-3), 617-627.

Jackson, M. O. and A. Wolinsky (1996). A strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of economic theory 71 (1), 44-74.

Johnson, C. and R. P. Gilles (2003). Spatial social networks. In Networks and Groups, pp. 51-77. Springer.

Kromhout, M. and P. Vedder (1996). Cultural inversion in afro-caribbean children in the netherlands. Anthropology & education quarterly 27 (4), 568-586.

McPherson, J. M. and L. Smith-Lovin (1986). Sex segregation in voluntary associations. American Sociological Review, 61-79.

McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology 27, 415-444.

Neto, F., J. Barros, and P. G. Schmitz (2005). Acculturation attitudes and adaptation among portuguese immigrants in germany: Integration or separation. Psychology and Developing Societies 17 (1), 19-32.

Pancs, R. and N. J. Vriend (2007). Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited. Journal of Public Economics 91 (1-2), 1-24.

Phinney, J. S., G. Horenczyk, K. Liebkind, and P. Vedder (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: An interactional perspective. Journal of social issues 57 (3), 493-510.

Ruef, M., H. E. Aldrich, and N. M. Carter (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among u.s. entrepreneurs. American sociological review 68, 195-222.

Safi, S. (2018). Essays on networks, social ties, and labor markets.

Schelling, T. C. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review 59 (2), 488-493.

Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of mathematical sociology 1 (2), 143-186.

Shrum, W., N. H. Cheek Jr., and S. MacD (1988). Friendship in school: Gender and racial homophily. Sociology of Education 61, 227-239.

Twist, K. A. (2019). Partnering with Extremists: Coalitions Between Mainstream and Far-right Parties in Western Europe. University of Michigan Press.

Zhang, J. (2011). Tipping and residential segregation: a unified schelling model. Journal of Regional Science 51 (1), 167-193.