Agricultural and urban land use policies to manage human–wildlife conflicts

Yoshida, Jun and Imoto, Tomoko and Kono, Tatsuhito (2022): Agricultural and urban land use policies to manage human–wildlife conflicts.

Abstract

Human–wildlife conflicts occur in residential areas, causing human injuries and outbreaks of zoonotic diseases. Governments have implemented policies, such as extermination, and construction of animal deterrent fences. When wildlife has a high biological value, we face a trade-off between the benefits of wildlife conservation and human safety. This study proposes a new policy of growing crops preferred by wildlife, rather than crops for human consumption, in part of the farmland, thereby attracting wildlife to the converted field and preventing them from entering residential areas. Using an ecosystem-urban economics model, we compare multiple policies including the conversion policy in terms of social welfare, and show that, regardless of the wildlife value, the crop conversion policy can be the most efficient, and fences with land use regulation is the second most efficient policy. On the other hand, the commonly-used policy of extermination is not so effective because exterminating wildlife with a high biological value significantly reduces social welfare.Human–wildlife conflicts occur in residential areas, causing human injuries and outbreaks of zoonotic diseases. Governments have implemented policies, such as extermination, and construction of animal deterrent fences. When wildlife has a high biological value, we face a trade-off between the benefits of wildlife conservation and human safety. This study proposes a new policy of growing crops preferred by wildlife, rather than crops for human consumption, in part of the farmland, thereby attracting wildlife to the converted field and preventing them from entering residential areas. Using an ecosystem-urban economics model, we compare multiple policies including the conversion policy in terms of social welfare, and show that, regardless of the wildlife value, the crop conversion policy can be the most efficient, and fences with land use regulation is the second most efficient policy. On the other hand, the commonly-used policy of extermination is not so effective because exterminating wildlife with a high biological value significantly reduces social welfare.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Human–wildlife conflict; land use regulation; extermination; animal deterrent fence; ecosystem conservation; urban economics model
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R14 - Land Use Patterns

References

Abrahms, B. (2021). Human–wildlife conflict under climate change. Science, 373(6554), 484-485.

Borck, R. (2016). Will skyscrapers save the planet? Building height limits and urban greenhouse gas emissions. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 58, 13-25.

Borck, R., and Brueckner, J. K. (2018). Optimal energy taxation in cities. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 5(2), 481-516.

Brueckner, J. K. (2000). Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review, 23(2), 160-171.

Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S., and Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59–67.

Distefano, E. (2005). Human-Wildlife Conflict worldwide: collection of case studies, analysis of management strategies and good practices. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development Initiative (SARDI), Rome, Italy. Available from: FAO Corporate Document repository http://www. fao.org/documents.

Eppink, F. V., J. van den Bergh, Rietveld, P. (2004). Modelling biodiversity and land use: urban growth, agriculture and nature in a wetland area. Ecological Economics, 51(3), 201–216.

Eichner, T., and Pethig, R. (2006). Economic land use, ecosystem services and microfounded species dynamics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52(3), 707–720.

Eichner, T., and Pethig, R. (2009). Pricing the ecosystem and taxing ecosystem services: a general equilibrium approach. Journal of Economic Theory, 144(4), 1589–1616.

Finnoff, D., & Tschirhart, J. (2008). Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(2), 91-114.

Fujita, M. (1989). Urban economic theory: land use and city size. Cambridge university press.

Gates, B. (2016, October 10). Why I’d Rather Cuddle with a Shark than a Kissing Bug. Retrieved from https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Most-Deadly-Animal-Mosquito-Week-2016 (last accessed on November 29, 2017).

Kido, K., Nishino, S., & Izumiyama, S. (2011). Movement and space use of Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in Satochi-satoyama areas. Bulletin Shinshu University Alpine Field Center, (9), 27-32.

Kono, T., and Kawaguchi, H. (2016). Cordon Pricing and Land Use Regulation. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 119(2), 405–434.

Kono, T., and Joshi, K. (2012). A new interpretation on the optimal density regulations: Closed and open city. Journal of Housing Economics, 21(3), 223–234.

Kono, T., and Joshi, K. (2017). Spatial Externalities and Land Use Regulation: An Integrated Set of Multiple Density Regulations. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(3), 571-598.

Kono, T., & Joshi, K. K. (2019). Traffic Congestion and Land Use Regulations: Theory and Policy Analysis. Elsevier.

Kono, T., Joshi, K. K., Kato, T., and Yokoi, T. (2012). Optimal regulation on building size and city boundary: An effective second-best remedy for traffic congestion externality. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(4), 619–630.

Krafte Holland, K., Larson, L. R., & Powell, R. B. (2018). Characterizing conflict between humans and big cats Panthera spp: A systematic review of research trends and management opportunities. PloS one, 13(9), e0203877.

The Ministry of Environment, Japan. (2021). Manual for Responding to Bear Appearances. Retrieved from https://www.env.go.jp/nature/choju/docs/docs5-4a/index.html (last accessed on September 7, 2022).

Penteriani, V., Delgado, M. D. M., Pinchera, F., Naves, J., Fernández-Gil, A., Kojola, I., ... & López-Bao, J. V. (2016). Human behaviour can trigger large carnivore attacks in developed countries. Scientific reports, 6(1), 1-8.

Pines, D., and Kono, T. (2012). FAR regulations and unpriced transport congestion. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(6), 931–937.

Poessel, S. A., Breck, S. W., Teel, T. L., Shwiff, S., Crooks, K. R., & Angeloni, L. (2013). Patterns of human–coyote conflicts in the Denver Metropolitan Area. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 77(2), 297-305.

Pyke, G. H. (2015). Understanding movements of organisms: it's time to abandon the Lévy foraging hypothesis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(1), 1-16.

Rhee, Hyok-Joo, Sanggyun Yu, and Georg Hirte. (2014). Zoning in cities with traffic congestion and agglomeration economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics 44, 82–93.

Tschirhart, J. (2000). General equilibrium of an ecosystem. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 203(1), 13–32.

Walker, R. (2001). Urban sprawl and natural areas encroachment: linking land cover change and economic development in the Florida Everglades. Ecological Economics, 37(3), 357–369.

White, L. A., & Gehrt, S. D. (2009). Coyote attacks on humans in the United States and Canada. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14(6), 419–432.

Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., and Rabinowitz, A. (2005). People and wildlife: Conflict or Co-existence? No. 9. Cambridge University Press.

Yoshida, J., & Kono, T. (2020). Land use policies considering a natural ecosystem. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 83, 103552.

Yoshida, J., & Kono, T. (2022). Cities and biodiversity: Spatial efficiency of land use. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 197, 685–705.