“Good” and “bad” GDP: Output fall in transition economies and the dead rat effect

Popov, Vladimir (2022): “Good” and “bad” GDP: Output fall in transition economies and the dead rat effect.

Abstract

Among the many explanations of the deep transformational recession in the post-communist economies during the transition from a centrally planned economy to market economy in the 1990s there is one that considers this recession as a statistical fiction: the elimination of “unneeded under a less wasteful economic system” output, such as defense goods and statues of Lenin, did not lead to the reduction of welfare. If adjustment is made for this kind of “redundant output”, there was probably no recession at all or it was very mild.

This paper argues that the attempts to exclude some economic activities from a country’s GDP are counterproductive – the mere principle of statistical registration in this case is undermined. Unfortunately, we cannot agree on what type of economic activity is good for welfare and what type is bad. Slave trade and weapons for colonial wars, statues of Lenin and Egyptian pyramids, cannot be regarded as value subtraction, but should be included into GDP creation activities.

The economic rationale for counting all activities as productive is that GDP is a measurement of production capacity, or economic potential of the country; it evaluates the ability of a nation to produce a particular amount of goods and services, no matter what is the exact nomenclature of these goods and services.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: calculation of GDP, transformational recession, welfare and GDP, centrally planned economies
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P24 - National Income, Product, and Expenditure ; Money ; Inflation; P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems > P51 - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

References

Åslund, Anders (2001). The Myth of Output Collapse after Communism Post-Soviet Economies Project. Russian and Eurasian program, Number 18, March 2001. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/18aslund.pdf

Club of Rome (2017). Come On!: Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. 2017. Https://www.clubofrome.org/2017/10/25/new-report-to-the-club-of-rome-come-on/.

Gaddy, Clifford G., Barry W. Ickes (2001). How to think about the post-soviet output fall. The Brookings Institution. The Pennsylvania State University, Draft: March 28, 2001. Http://www.personal.psu.edu/i04/camellia.pdf

McDaniel, Sean and Craig Berry (2017). Measuring and understanding the economy literature-review. Prepared by the IPPR Commission for Economic Justice. September 2017 (http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Measuring-and-understanding-the-economy-literature-review.pdf).

Stiglitz, Joseph E., Amartya K. Sen, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf

Winiecki, Jan (1991) The inevitability of a fall in output in the early stages of transition to the market: Theoretical underpinnings. – Soviet Studies, 43:4, 669-676.

Winiecki, Jan (2002). An Inquiry into the Early Drastic Fall of Output in Post-communist Transition: An Unsolved Puzzle. - Post-Communist Economies , Volume 14, 2002 - Issue 1, Pages 5-29. Published online: 19 Aug 2010.