Social protection for happiness? The impact of social pension reform on subjective well-being of the Korean elderly

Pak, Tae-Young (2020): Social protection for happiness? The impact of social pension reform on subjective well-being of the Korean elderly. Published in: Journal of Policy Modeling , Vol. 42, No. 2 (1 March 2020): pp. 349-366.

Abstract

Expanding the scope of the traditional indicators used to assess economic progress with measures of subjective well-being has been of growing importance in policy modeling. A recent Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi report argued that policy decisions and welfare evaluations should be approached from a broader perspective on well-being and take into account metrics derived from self-reports of living conditions. To this end, we evaluate the efficacy of the 2014 social pension reform in South Korea by examining various domains of subjective well-being. The South Korean government introduced a basic old-age pension in 2008 and doubled its monthly benefits in 2014. The reform in 2014 represents one of the largest social welfare expansions in South Korean history, with an aim to improve seniors’ quality of life. Using data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging, we estimate a matched difference-in-differences model that isolates the causal effects of benefit increase from underlying trend changes in well-being. Results show that the reform was associated with an average of 4.8-5.7% increase in financial satisfaction among beneficiaries, and that this correlation was more pronounced for retirees, seniors above age 70, and those at the bottom of wealth distribution. However, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that satisfaction with health status, parent-child relationship, and overall quality of life has improved in response to the reform. Our findings are in contrast to the past evidence on objective welfare gains associated with pension expansion. Taken together this study calls for the use of self-reported well-being data in policy evaluation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: subjective well-being; life satisfaction; public transfer; non-contributory pension; elderly poverty
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

References

Abels, M., & Guven, M. U. (2016). Pension systems in sub-Saharan Africa: Brief review of design parameters and key performance indicators (Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper No. 1610). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Austin, P. C. (2009). Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 3083-3107.

Bando, R., Galiani, S., & Gertler, P. (2016). The effects of non-contributory pensions on material and subjective well being (NBER Working Paper No. w22995). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Barrientos, A. (2003). What is the impact of non-contributory pensions on poverty? Estimates from Brazil and South Africa. Unpublished paper. Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.

Barrientos, A., & Lloyd-Sherlock, P. (2002). Non-contributory pensions and social protection. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.

Barrientos, A., & Lloyd-Sherlock, P. (2003). Non-contributory pension schemes: A new model for social security in the South?. Paper presented at the 4th International Research Conference on Social Security, Antwerp, Netherlands.

Beattie, R. (2000). Social protection for all: But how?. International Labour Review, 139, 129-148.

Bertrand, M., Muldainathan, S., & Miller, D. (2003). Public policy and extended families: Evidence from pensions in South Africa. The World Bank Economic Review, 17, 27–50.

Bertranou, F., & Grushka, C. O. (2002). The non-contributory pension programme in Argentina: Assessing the impact on poverty reduction (Social Security Paper No. 5). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.

Blundell, R., & Costa-Dias, M. (2000). Evaluation methods for non‐experimental data. Fiscal Studies, 21, 427-468.

Bonsang, E., Adam, S., & Perelman, S. (2012). Does retirement affect cognitive functioning?. Journal of Health Economics, 31, 490-501.

Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31-72.

Case, A. (2004). Does money protect health status? Evidence from South African pensions. In Perspectives on the Economics of Aging (pp. 287-312). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Case, A., & Menendez, A. (2007). Does money empower the elderly? Evidence from the Agincourt demographic surveillance site, South Africa1. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35, 157-164.

Cheng, L., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2018). The health implications of social pensions: Evidence from China’s new rural pension scheme. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46, 53-77.

Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Friendship and natural selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 10796-10801.

Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359-381.

Cox, D., & Jimenez, E. (1989). Private transfers and public policy in developing countries: A case study for Peru (Policy, Planning and Research Department Working Paper No. WPS 345). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Cuesta, J., & Olivera, M. (2014). The impact of social security reform on the labor market: The case of Colombia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36, 1118-1134.

Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151-161.

Dethier, J., Pestieau, P., & Ali, R., (2010). Universal minimum old age pensions: Impact on poverty and fiscal cost in 18 Latin American countries (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5541). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Duflo, E. (2000). Child health and household resources in South Africa: Evidence from the old age pension program. American Economic Review, 90, 393-398.

Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89-125). New York: Academic Press.

Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997-1019.

Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Bando, R. (2016). Non-contributory pensions. Labour Economics, 38, 47-58.

Galiani, S., & Weinschelbaum, F. (2012). Modeling informality formally: Households and firms. Economic Inquiry, 50, 821-838.

George, L. K. (1992). Economic status and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. In N. E. Cutler, D. W. Gregg, & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Age, money, and life satisfaction. Aspects of financial gerontology (pp. 69-99). New York: Springer.

Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605-654.

Hsieh, C. M. (2011). Money and happiness: Does age make a difference?. Ageing & Society, 31(8), 1289-1306.

Hubbard, R. G., Skinner, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (1995). Precautionary saving and social insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 360-399.

Jones, R.S., & Urasawa, S. (2014) Reducing the high rate of poverty among the elderly in Korea (Economics Department Working Paper No. 1163). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Juarez, L. (2009). Crowding out of private support to the elderly: Evidence from a demogrant in Mexico. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 454-463.

Kakwani, N., & Subbarao, K. (2007). Poverty among the elderly in sub-Saharan Africa and the role of social pensions. The Journal of Development Studies, 43, 987-1008.

Kang, S., & Moon, S. (2013). The effects of basic old-age pension on economic satisfaction among the elderly. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 23, 59-85.

Kim, S. H., Lee, H. J., & Shon, B. D. (2016). Poverty in Korea. Paju, Korea: Han Ul Academy.

Kroll, C., & Delhey, J. (2013). A happy nation? Opportunities and challenges of using subjective indicators in policymaking. Social Indicators Research, 114, 13-28.

Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1833-1845.

Lee, S. (2017). Population ageing and retirement security in Korea. In C. Martinez, T. Weyman, & J. van Dijk (Eds.), Demographic transition, labour markets and regional resilience (pp. 199-215). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Lee, S., & Cho, H. (2015). Impact of basic senior pension on income and consumption: The regression-discontinuity approach. Journal of Governance Studies, 10, 117-142.

Lee, C. J., & Kwon, H. J. (2016). Analysis of impacts of the basic pension: Focusing on living expenses of the elderly. Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 28, 365–388.

Lee, J. H., & Moon, S. (2014). The effects of basic pension on elderly consumption. Korean Policy Studies Review, 23, 411-440.

Moon, H. P. (2009). The role of social pensions in the Republic of Korea. In R. Holzmann, D. Robalino, & N. Takayama (Eds.), Closing the coverage gap: The role of social pensions and other retirement income transfers (pp. 119–124). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55, 56-67.

Nelissen, J. H. (1999). A payable alternative for the Dutch old-age pension system. Journal of Policy Modeling, 21, 275-282. OECD (2011). Pensions at a glance 2011: Retirement-income systems in OECD and G20 countries. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Pak, T. Y. (2019). Old-age income security and tourism demand: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Travel Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519878512

Park, J. S., & Kim, J. K. (2015). The effects of basic old-age pension on household income and expenditure. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 25, 345–370.

Powers, E. T. (1998). Does means-testing welfare discourage saving? Evidence from a change in AFDC policy in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 68, 33-53.

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.

Salinas-Rodriguez, A., Torres-Peneda, M. d. P., Manrique-Espinoza, B., Moreno-Tamayo, K., & Téllez-Rojo Solis, M. M. (2014). Impact of the non-contributory social pension program 70 y más on older adults’ mental well-being. PLoS One, 9, e113085.

Shin, E. H., & Do, Y. K. (2015). Basic old-age pension and financial wellbeing of older adults in South Korea. Ageing & Society, 35, 1055–1074.

Sianesi, B. (2004). An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labor market programs in the 1990s. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 133-155.

Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J.P. (2010). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris, France: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.

United Nations (2016). Income security for older persons in the Republic of Korea. New York, NY: The United Nations.

Willmore, L. (2007). Universal pensions for developing countries. World Development, 35, 24-51.