Ozili, Peterson K (2023): Bank loan loss provisioning for sustainable development: the case for a sustainable or green loan loss provisioning system. Published in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115989.pdf Download (701kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to present a sustainable (or green) loan loss provisioning system that align bank loan loss provisioning with the sustainable development goals. The findings of the study are that the proposed sustainable (or green) loan loss provisioning system will align bank loan loss provisioning with the sustainable development goals by adjusting loan loss provisions estimates to reflect the environmental benefits and costs of borrowers’ business activities. Banks will incur additional provisions above normal provisions for loans issued to businesses whose activities are harmful to the environment and the climate. Banks will allocate fewer provisions whenever they issue loans to eco-friendly or green businesses. The implication of the proposed sustainable (or green) loan loss provisioning system is that bank regulators and supervisors need to consider the impact of the sustainable (or green) loan loss provisioning system on bank capital and bank stability.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Bank loan loss provisioning for sustainable development: the case for a sustainable or green loan loss provisioning system |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Bank performance, loan loss provisions, sustainability, sustainable development, SDGs, green washing, credit risk, green loan loss provisioning, sustainable loan loss provisioning. |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 115989 |
Depositing User: | Dr Peterson K Ozili |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2023 06:47 |
Last Modified: | 14 Jan 2023 06:47 |
References: | Attig, N., Rahaman, M. M., and Trabelsi, S. 2021. Greenwashing and Bank Loan Contracting: Does Environmental Disclosure Quality Matter to Creditors?. Available at SSRN 3880113. Avrampou, A., Skouloudis, A., Iliopoulos, G., and Khan, N. 2019. Advancing the sustainable development goals: Evidence from leading European banks. Sustainable Development 27(4): 743-757. Buallay, A., Fadel, S. M., Alajmi, J., and Saudagaran, S. 2020. Sustainability reporting and bank performance after financial crisis: evidence from developed and developing countries. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal 31(4): 747-770. Camfferman, K. 2015. The emergence of the ‘incurred-loss’ model for credit losses in IAS 39. Accounting in Europe 12(1): 1-35. Carè, R. 2018. Exploring the role of banks in sustainable development. In Sustainable banking (pp. 39-64). Palgrave Pivot, Cham Carnevale, C., and Mazzuca, M. 2014. Sustainability report and bank valuation: evidence from E uropean stock markets. Business Ethics: A European Review 23(1): 69-90. Cohen, B. H., and Edwards, G. 2017. The new era of expected credit loss provisioning. BIS Quarterly Review, March. Cosma, S., Venturelli, A., Schwizer, P., and Boscia, V. 2020. Sustainable development and European banks: A non-financial disclosure analysis. Sustainability 12(15): 6146. Dechow, P. M., and Skinner, D. J. 2000. Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting horizons 14(2): 235-250. Edwards, G. A. 2014. The upcoming new era of expected loss provisioning. SEACEN Financial Stability Journal 2: 13-24. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115989 |