Challenges to International Climate Policy – Lessons Learned and Alternatives

ruble, isabella and Dagher, Leila (2009): Challenges to International Climate Policy – Lessons Learned and Alternatives. Published in: International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses , Vol. 1, No. 2 (2010): pp. 87-101.

Abstract

The atmosphere represents a global commons and containing global warming can be con�sidered an international public good. There is now increasing consensus that in order to avoid high risks of climate change the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere should not exceed the 500ppm CO2e by 2050. To reach the desired target a strong international effort with binding emission caps for major polluting countries is required. The success of any post-Kyoto agreement at mitigating global warming stands or falls with the participation of developing countries, of which China and India are among the top five emitters in the world. Underlying the difficulty of reaching a comprehensive agreement are two basic issues pertaining to the public good nature of the atmosphere. First, reducing greenhouse gas emissions is costly while benefits are shared universally; this gives nations an incentive to free ride. Second, there are large differences in past, current and projected future emissions. Independent of its particular shape, a post-Kyoto agreement will likely have an emissions trading system as its centerpiece. In this paper we present, based on the experiences with the Kyoto Protocol and the EU-ETS the challenges to be overcome when designing a global carbon market. The economic theories of public choice and of regulation will be used to shed light on the im�portance of design features when developing the blueprint for such global carbon market. Looking at the divergent positions taken by developed and developing countries we argue in favor of decentralized measures

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: EU-ETS; Global Carbon Market; National Allocation Plans; Public Choice; Renewable Energy
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics

References

Baumert, Kevin A., Herzog, Timothy, and Pershing, Jonathan.Navigating the Numbers, Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy, World Resource Institute, Washington D.C., 2005.

Buchanan, James M. "Rent Seeking and Profit Seeking." In Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, James M. Buchanan, Robert D. Tollison and Gordon Tullock (eds.), , Chapter 1, college Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press; pp. 3-15,1980.

Cowen, Tyler, “Should We Put a Tax on Carbon” In Marginalrevolution.com, May 15th, 2009. Available at: http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2009/05/should-we-put-a-carbon-tax-on-china.html

Daugbjerg, Carsten and Svendsen, GertTinggaard. Green Taxation in Question – Politics and Economic Efficiency in Environmental Regulation, Palgrave New York, 2001.

European Environmental Agency, “Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2006 – Tracking progress towards Kyoto targets”, EEA Report No 9, 2006. ———, “Greenhouse gas emission trendsand projections in Europe 2007 – Tracking progress towards Kyoto targets”, EEA Report No 5, 2007. ———, “Greenhouse gas emission trendsand projections in Europe 2009 – Tracking progress towards Kyoto targets”, EEA Report No 9, 2009 EllermanA. Denny, Buchner Barbara K., “The European Union ETS: Origins,

Allocation, and Early Results.”Review of Environmental Economics & Policy 1 (1), 66 – 87, 2007. ———, “Climate and Trade: Links between the Kyoto Protocol and the WTO” Environment, 47 (7), 2005.

Frankel Jeffrey, “Formulas for Quantitative Emission Targets.” In Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post Kyoto World, Edited by Joe Aldy and Robert Stavins, Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Frankel, Jeffreyand Rose, Andrew K., “Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality”,The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, 87(1), 85-91, 2005.

Krugman, Paul, “Empire of Carbon”, The New York Times, OPED, May 15th, 2009. Available at:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/opinion/15krugman.html

IPCCa, Rogner, H., Zhou, D., Bradley R., Crabbé, P., Edenhofer O., Hare, B., (Australia), Kuijpers, L.,Yamaguchi, M., “Introduction.” In: Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds.)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom andNew York, NY, USA, 2007. IPCCb, Gupta, S., Tirpak, D. A., Burger, N., Gupta, J., Höhne,N., Boncheva, A.I., Kanoan, G.M., Kolstad,C., Kruger, J.A., Michaelowa, A., Murase, S., Pershing, J., Saijo, T., Sari, A.,“Policies, Instruments and Co-operative Arrangements.” In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Metz,B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave R., Meyer, L.A. (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007.Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg3/ar4-wg3-chapter13.pdf

Hepburn, Cameron, Grubb Michael, NeuhoffKarsten, Matthes Felix and TseMaximilien, “Auctioning of EU ETS Phase II Allowances: how and why?”Climate Policy, 6: 137-160, 2006.

Hepburn, Cameronand Stern, Nicholas, “A new global deal on climate change”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24 (2), 259-279, 2008.

IEAa, International Energy Agency, Key World Energy Statistics, 2009. Available at: www.iea.org

IEAb, International Energy Agency, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion – Highlights, 2009. Available at:www.iea.org

Kruger Joseph, Oates, Wallace E. and Pizer William A., 2007, “Decentralization in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Lessons for Global Policy”,Discussion Papers, 07-02, Resources For the Future, Washington D.C., 1-31, 2007.

McChesney, Fred S. Money for Nothing – Politicians, Rent Extraction and Political Extortion, Havard 1997, pp. 9-10.

NeuhoffKarsten, “Tackling Carbon”,Electricity Policy Research Group, University of Cambridge, 1-110, 2008.Available at:http://www.electricitypolicy.org.uk/TSEC/2/neuhoff230508.pdf

Nordhaus, William D., “To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slowing Global Warming”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1 (1): 26-44, 2007.

Point Carbon, 2008, ‘Carbon 2008, Post 2012 is now’.

Schelling, Thomas C., “The Cost of Combating Global Warming, Facing the Tradeoffs”Foreign Affairs, 76 (6), 1997. ———, “What Makes Greenhouse Sense? Time to Rethink the Kyoto Protocol”, Foreign Affairs, 81 (3), 2002.

Schleich, Joachim, Betz, Regina and Rogge, Karoline, “EU Emission Trading – Better Job Second Time Around”, Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation, Fraunhofer ISI Institute Systems and Innovation Research, S2, 1-36, 2007. Der Spiegel Online Edition October 28, 2009http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/0,1518,657641-3,00.html

Stern, Nicholas, The Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2007. ———, The Global Deal – Climate Change and The Creation of a New Era of Progress and Prosperity, Public Affairs New York, 2009.

Tullock, Gordon “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft”, Western Economic Journal, V (3), June: 224-232, 1967.

Varghese, Abraham, and Joseph Thomas. “Global Energy Policy in Response to Climate Change”,International Journal of Climate Change, Impacts and Responses, 1 (3), 2009.

Wittneben, Bettina B.F., “Exxon is right: Let us re-examine our choice for a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax”, Energy Policy 37, 2462-2464, 2009.

Yandle, Bruce, “Bootleggers and Baptists in Retrospect”, Environment and Risk, Vol.22, Nr.3, 1999. ———, “After Kyoto: A Global Scramble for Advantage”, The Independent Review, vol.9, nr.1, pp.19-40, 1999.