Gender-role identity in adolescence and women fertility in adulthood

Bethencourt, Carlos and Santos-Torres, Daniel (2023): Gender-role identity in adolescence and women fertility in adulthood.

Abstract

In the new era of economics of fertility, the identification of the determinants of fertility has become one of the major challenges. This paper analyzes how the fertility patterns of both female teenagers’ own families and peers’ families (measured as the number of siblings) affect their future fertility choices. Our analysis distinguishes between the extensive (becoming a mother or not) and the intensive (total number of children) margin of fertility. We provide five main results. First, neither own number of siblings nor peers’ number of siblings affect whether a woman becomes a mother or not. Second, women with more siblings and women whose peers had more siblings tend to have more children. Third, the peer effect is stronger for women who reported having a less close relationship with their mothers. Forth, women that were teenagers characterized by high scores and being involved in activities related to popularity experience a negligible peer effect. Further, more communication between teenagers’ parents increases the influence of women’s own family but reduces the peer effect. These results suggest that fertility patterns of both female teenagers’ own families and peers’ families are relevant in shaping women’s identitydefining role in fertility, specially in the intensive margin; and that the relative importance of these two patterns depends on the quality of the relationships between all actors (between teenagers, between teenagers and their parents, and between teenagers’ parents).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: motherhood, fertility, peer effect, gender-role identity
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General

References

Aaronson, D., Lange, F., Mazumder, B., 2014. Fertility transitions along the extensive and intensive margins. American Economic Review 104, 3701–3724.

Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G.W., Wooldridge, J., 2017. When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Technical Report. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 24003.

Adler, P.A., Adler, P., 1998. Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. Rutgers University Press.

Adler, P.A., Kless, S.J., Adler, P., 1992. Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education , 169–187.

Adserà, A., 2017. The future fertility of highly educated women: The role of educational composition shifts and labor market barriers. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 15, 19–25.

Akerlof, G., Kranton, R.E., 2011. Identity economics: How our identities shape our work, wages, and well-being. 1 ed., Princeton University Press.

Akerlof, G.A., Kranton, R.E., 2000. Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 715–753.

Akresh, R., De Walque, D., Kazianga, H., 2016. Evidence from a randomized evaluation of the household welfare impacts of conditional and unconditional cash transfers given to mothers or fathers. Technical Report. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7730.

Altonji, J.G., Elder, T.E., Taber, C.R., 2005. Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy 113, 151–184.

Anderton, D.L., Tsuya, N.O., Bean, L.L., Mineau, G.P., 1987. Intergenerational transmission of relative fertility and life course patterns. Demography 24, 467–480.

Anelli, M., Peri, G., 2019. The effects of high school peers’ gender on college major, college performance and income. The Economic Journal 129, 553–602.

Angrist, J.D., Lang, K., 2004. Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston’s Metco Program. American Economic Review 94, 1613–1634.

Ashraf, N., Field, E., Lee, J., 2014. Household bargaining and excess fertility: An experimental study in Zambia. American Economic Review 104, 2210–37.

Baudin, T., De la Croix, D., Gobbi, P., 2020. Endogenous childlessness and stages of development. Journal of the European Economic Association 18, 83–133.

Baudin, T., De La Croix, D., Gobbi, P., 2015. Fertility and childlessness in the United States. American Economic Review 105, 1852–1882.

Baudin, T., De La Croix, D., Gobbi, P., 2019. Childlessness and economic development: A survey, in: Human Capital and Economic Growth. Springer, pp. 55–90.

Beaver, K.M., Wright, J.P., 2011. The association between county-level IQ and county-level crime rates. Intelligence 39, 22–26.

Behrman, J.R., Kohler, H.P., Watkins, S.C., 2002. Social networks and changes in contraceptive use over time: Evidence from a longitudinal study in rural Kenya. Demography 39, 713–738.

Bifulco, R., Fletcher, J.M., Oh, S.J., Ross, S.L., 2014. Do high school peers have persistent effects on college attainment and other life outcomes? Labour Economics 29, 83–90.

Bifulco, R., Fletcher, J.M., Ross, S.L., 2011. The effect of classmate characteristics on postsecondary outcomes: Evidence from the Add Health. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3, 25–53.

Black, S.E., Devereux, P.J., Salvanes, K.G., 2013. Under pressure? The effect of peers on outcomes of young adults. Journal of Labor Economics 31, 119–153.

Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., Fortin, B., 2009. Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics 150, 41–55.

Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., Fortin, B., 2019. Peer effects in networks: A survey. Technical Report. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 12947.

Brée, S., De La Croix, D., 2019. Key forces behind the decline of fertility: Lessons from childlessness in Rouen before the industrial revolution. Cliometrica 13, 25–54.

Buchanan, H.T., Blankenbaker, J., Cotten, D., 1976. Academic and athletic ability as popularity factors in elementary school children. Research Quarterly. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation 47, 320–325.

Calvó-Armengol, A., Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., 2009. Peer effects and social networks in education. The Review of Economic Studies 76, 1239–1267.

Cameron, A.C., Miller, D.L., 2015. A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources 50, 317–372.

Carrell, S.E., Hoekstra, M., Kuka, E., 2018. The long-run effects of disruptive peers. American Economic Review 108, 3377–3415.

Census Bureau, U.S., 2018. Fertility of Women in United States: 2018, Table 2: Children Ever Born, Number of Mothers, and Percent Childless by Age and Marital Status, and by Nativity: June 2018. URL: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2018/demo/ fertility/women-fertility.html#par_list_57. Accessed 2 Nov 2021.

Ciliberto, F., Miller, A.R., Nielsen, H.S., Simonsen, M., 2016. Playing the fertility game at work: An equilibrium model of peer effects. International Economic Review 57, 827–856.

Coleman, J.S., 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S120.

Cools, A., Fern´andez, R., Patacchini, E., 2019. Girls, boys, and high achievers. Technical Report. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 25763.

Cools, A., Patacchini, E., 2017. Sibling gender composition and women’s wages. Technical Report. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 11001.

De la Croix, D., Delavallade, C., 2018. Religions, fertility, and growth in Southeast Asia. International Economic Review 59, 907–946.

De Giorgi, G., Frederiksen, A., Pistaferri, L., 2020. Consumption network effects. The Review of Economic Studies 87, 130–163.

De Giorgi, G., Pellizzari, M., Redaelli, S., 2010. Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2, 241–275.

De Laat, J., Sevilla-Sanz, A., 2011. The fertility and women’s labor force participation puzzle in OECD countries: The role of men’s home production. Feminist Economics 17, 87–119.

Doepke, M., Hannusch, A., Kindermann, F., Tertilt, M., 2022. The Economics of Fertility: A New Era. Technical Report. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 29948.

Doepke, M., Kindermann, F., 2019. Bargaining over babies: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. American Economic Review 109, 3264–3306.

Doepke, M., Tertilt, M., 2018. Women’s empowerment, the gender gap in desired fertility, and fertility outcomes in developing countries, in: AEA Papers and Proceedings, pp. 358–62.

Eder, D., Kinney, D.A., 1995. The effect of middle school extra curricular activities on adolescents’ popularity and peer status. Youth & Society 26, 298–324.

Erikson, E.H., 1968. Identity: Youth and crisis. 7, WW Norton & company.

Fernández, R., Fogli, A., 2006. Fertility: The role of culture and family experience. Journal of the European Economic Association 4, 552–561.

Fernández, R., Fogli, A., 2009. Culture: An empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1, 146–177.

Feyrer, J., Sacerdote, B., Stern, A.D., 2008. Will the stork return to Europe and Japan? Understanding fertility within developed nations. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22, 3–22.

Friesen, J., Krauth, B., 2007. Sorting and inequality in Canadian schools. Journal of Public Economics 91, 2185–2212.

Gobbi, P., 2013. A model of voluntary childlessness. Journal of Population Economics 26, 963–982.

Gobbi, P.E., Goñi, M., 2021. Childless aristocrats: Inheritance and the extensive margin of fertility. The Economic Journal 131, 2089–2118.

Greenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., Santos, C., 2014. Marry your like: Assortative mating and income inequality. American Economic Review 104, 348–53.

Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., Rivkin, S.G., 2002. Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities? Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 584–599.

Hazan, M., Zoabi, H., 2015. Do highly educated women choose smaller families? The Economic Journal 125, 1191–1226.

Heckman, J.J., Stixrud, J., Urzua, S., 2006. The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor economics 24, 411–482.

Hensvik, L., Nilsson, P., 2010. Businesses, buddies and babies: Social ties and fertility at work. Technical Report. Institute for Labor Market Policy Evaluation Working Paper Series, No. 2010:9.

Hoxby, C.M., 2000a. The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 1239–1285.

Hoxby, C.M., 2000b. Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. Technical Report. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 7867.

Kravdal, Ø., Rindfuss, R.R., 2008. Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review 73, 854–873.

Lavy, V., Paserman, M.D., Schlosser, A., 2012. Inside the black box of ability peer effects: Evidence from variation in the proportion of low achievers in the classroom. The Economic Journal 122, 208–237.

Lavy, V., Schlosser, A., 2011. Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3, 1–33.

Lease, A.M., Musgrove, K.T., Axelrod, J.L., 2002. Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development 11, 508–533.

Ligon, E., 1994. The development and use of a consistent income measure for the General Social Survey. Citeseer.

Lleras-Muney, A., Miller, M., Sheng, S., Sovero, V.T., 2020. Party on: The labor market returns to social networks and socializing. Technical Report. NBER Working Paper Series, No 27337.

Lundberg, S.J., Pollak, R.A., Wales, T.J., 1997. Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit. Journal of Human Resources , 463–480.

Manski, C.F., 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies 60, 531–542.

Marcia, J.E., Waterman, A.S., Matteson, D.R., Archer, S.L., Orlofsky, J.L., 2012. Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research. Springer Science & Business Media.

Mayeux, L., Kleiser, M., 2020. A gender prototypicality theory of adolescent peer popularity. Adolescent Research Review 5, 295–306.

Murphy, M., 1999. Is the relationship between fertility of parents and children really weak? Social Biology 46, 122–145.

Murphy, M., Knudsen, L.B., 2002. The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: The effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies 56, 235–248.

Murphy, M., Wang, D., 2001. Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 17, 75–96.

Myong, S., Park, J., Yi, J., 2021. Social norms and fertility. Journal of the European Economic Association 19, 2429–2466.

Nicoletti, C., Salvanes, K.G., Tominey, E., 2018. The family peer effect on mothers’ labor supply. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10, 206–234.

Olivetti, C., Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., 2013. Mothers, friends and gender identity. Technical Report. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 19610.

Olivetti, C., Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., 2020. Mothers, peers, and gender-role identity. Journal of the European Economic Association 18, 266–301.

Parkhurst, J.T., Hopmeyer, A., 1998. Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence 18, 125–144.

Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., 2011. Neighborhood effects and parental involvement in the intergenerational transmission of education. Journal of Regional Science 51, 987–1013.

Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., 2016. Social networks and parental behavior in the intergenerational transmission of religion. Quantitative Economics 7, 969–995.

Puckett, M.B., Aikins, J.W., Cillessen, A.H., 2008. Moderators of the association between relational aggression and perceived popularity. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression 34, 563–576.

Richards-Shubik, S., 2015. Peer effects in sexual initiation: Separating demand and supply mechanisms. Quantitative Economics 6, 663–702.

Ringdal, C., Sjursen, I.H., 2021. Household bargaining and spending on children: Experimental evidence from Tanzania. Economica 88, 430–455.

Rodríguez-Planas, N., Sanz-de-Galdeano, A., Terskaya, A., 2022. Gender norms in high school: Impacts on risky behaviors from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 196, 429–456.

Rose, A., Click, G., Smith, R., Cillessen, A., Schwartz, D., Mayeux, L., 2011. Popularity and gender. Popularity in the Peer System , 103–122.

Rouse, K.E., 2012. The impact of high school leadership on subsequent educational attainment. Social Science Quarterly 93, 110–129.

Rowe, D.C., Jacobson, K.C., Van den Oord, E.J., 1999. Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary IQ: Parental education level as moderator. Child Development 70, 1151–1162.

Schoen, R., Astone, N.M., Kim, Y.J., Nathanson, C.A., Fields, J.M., 1999. Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family , 790–799.

Shi, Y., Moody, J., 2017. Most likely to succeed: Long-run returns to adolescent popularity. Social Currents 4, 13–33.

Steensma, T.D., Kreukels, B.P., de Vries, A.L., Cohen-Kettenis, P.T., 2013. Gender identity development in adolescence. Hormones and Behavior 64, 288–297.

Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., 2006. Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression 32, 396–408.

Westoff, C.F., et al., 2010. Desired number of children: 2000-2008. DHS comparative reports 2010, No. 25.

Wood, J., Klüsener, S., Neels, K., Myrskylä, M., 2020. Shifting links in the relationship between education and fertility. Population, Space and Place 26, e2342.